Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




710 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105

Trusted

Topic # 114995 9-Mar-2013 16:53
Send private message

Hey guys,

I've recently picked up a new client wanting me to upgrade their server. It's a HP ProLiant ML330 G6 running Windows SBS 2008, with a HP P410 RAID card and two 146 GB SAS 15k disks. 

Now, all they asked was for more disk space but while investigating I noticed whoever did their setup previously set up an array on one disk without using RAID, so there's a completely unused disk in there. Their staff do rotating off site backups nightly but I still feel uncomfortable about leaving the machine like this, especially when there's a perfectly good drive sitting there.

The system is currently partitioned 50% system/50% data, and both partitions are full. I'd like to migrate the data partition to 2x new SATA disks and expand the system partition. SAS disks are absolutely overkill for their requirements (<10 staff, used for Exchange, file sharing and a small database app).

What I imagine I need to do is image the drive, destroy the array, recreate it in RAID 1 then reimage the system back onto it, and then add another two disks to a separate RAID array and migrate the data partition onto that.

My questions:

1. What software should I use to perform this? I'm not sure if the RAID card is going to introduce any headaches.

2. If I set up the new data array with the same data and same drive letter as the previous partition, would that be an issue?

3. What's the best way to set up the arrays without an OS installed?

Cheers!




 


Create new topic
3384 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 389

Trusted

  Reply # 777412 9-Mar-2013 17:09
Send private message

My suggestion would be to virtualize the operating system that is already on there using a physical to virtual migration to an external disk, perhaps your laptop etc. Then put the new drives in (SATA) and install your hypervisor e.g. Hyper-V or ESXi. If going ESXi use a USB on the motherbaord (if it's a newish HP it will have a USB female on the motherboard).

I did exactly this process around 6 months ago for a client with an old ML110 G5 (I think) who were running server 2003. I did the above process and then I could also run a PFsense router, Asterisk based phone system and also setup a new 2008 r2 server and migrate them accross - all on the same server.

It also means if they want to switch to datacentre hosting or install new servers further down the track you are already virtualized.





497 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 93


  Reply # 777413 9-Mar-2013 17:12
Send private message

Hi,

Does the P410 have BBWC and/or cache modul?. If so the ACU can do an in place upgrade to a RAID 5, meaning you only need to add an 146gb extra drive. This gives you 290ish. Then extend the data drive as required

This assumes the drives are connected to the raid controller not the main board.


Might be easier than cloning

Clint

 
 
 
 




710 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105

Trusted

  Reply # 777415 9-Mar-2013 17:21
Send private message

Zeon: My suggestion would be to virtualize the operating system that is already on there using a physical to virtual migration to an external disk, perhaps your laptop etc. Then put the new drives in (SATA) and install your hypervisor e.g. Hyper-V or ESXi. If going ESXi use a USB on the motherbaord (if it's a newish HP it will have a USB female on the motherboard).


Good idea. I'll have a look at some virtualisation options. It does indeed have a USB on the motherboard.  I only have the machine for another 24 hours., so worst case scenario with a virtual machine I can get them back up and going if things do go pear shaped.

clinty: Hi,

Does the P410 have BBWC and/or cache modul?. If so the ACU can do an in place upgrade to a RAID 5, meaning you only need to add an 146gb extra drive. This gives you 290ish. Then extend the data drive as required

This assumes the drives are connected to the raid controller not the main board. 


Might be easier than cloning

Clint


I did look into this, unfortunately it doesn't have a BBWC or cache module installed.




 


1539 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 39

Trusted

  Reply # 777425 9-Mar-2013 17:57
Send private message

If the CPU supports it I would run Virtualize it like Zeon said and run Hyper-V Server 2012(Free and well ranked when compared to the Paid Version of VMware).

Even if you just make a clone of the current system in to a VM it allows for easy expansion & migration to new OS / cloud and any failures that you need to restore from in the future


On the disks..... Use the two 15k SAS drives in RAID 0 for Operating System Performance, and 2x Large SATA drives for Storage in RAID1 for redundancy.

Just remember make backups of the VM's so if you muck something you can just restore instead of starting fresh. :)

3384 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 389

Trusted

  Reply # 777471 9-Mar-2013 19:39
Send private message

boby55: If the CPU supports it I would run Virtualize it like Zeon said and run Hyper-V Server 2012(Free and well ranked when compared to the Paid Version of VMware).

Even if you just make a clone of the current system in to a VM it allows for easy expansion & migration to new OS / cloud and any failures that you need to restore from in the future


On the disks..... Use the two 15k SAS drives in RAID 0 for Operating System Performance, and 2x Large SATA drives for Storage in RAID1 for redundancy.

Just remember make backups of the VM's so if you muck something you can just restore instead of starting fresh. :)


I honestly wouldn't suggest making the SAS disks RAID 0, too risky. The P410 will already have pretty good performance and it doesn't sound like the system is that heavily utilized. I do think the suggestion of using the SAS disks for system is a good re-use of them though.





3384 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 389

Trusted

  Reply # 777472 9-Mar-2013 19:39
Send private message

boby55: If the CPU supports it I would run Virtualize it like Zeon said and run Hyper-V Server 2012(Free and well ranked when compared to the Paid Version of VMware).

Even if you just make a clone of the current system in to a VM it allows for easy expansion & migration to new OS / cloud and any failures that you need to restore from in the future


On the disks..... Use the two 15k SAS drives in RAID 0 for Operating System Performance, and 2x Large SATA drives for Storage in RAID1 for redundancy.

Just remember make backups of the VM's so if you muck something you can just restore instead of starting fresh. :)


I honestly wouldn't suggest making the SAS disks RAID 0, too risky. The P410 will already have pretty good performance and it doesn't sound like the system is that heavily utilized. I do think the suggestion of using the SAS disks for system is a good re-use of them though.







710 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105

Trusted

  Reply # 778734 12-Mar-2013 18:44
Send private message

Thanks for all the suggestions! Didn't want to mess with VM setup in the short time I had (1 weekend) with the machine. Ended up making a VMWare image and using Acronis True Image Home to migrate the SAS disks to a new SATA RAID array, and then back the other way. Windows forgot all of the shared folders so had to set that up again.

The damn caddys for the drives were $85 each at PBTech. What a rort.

Of course after I had done all that they asked about web filtering. Immediate regret that I didn't look into virtualisation at that point so I could run PFSense.




 


15312 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4035

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 778752 12-Mar-2013 19:10
Send private message

I don't think I would have run virtual in that environment. I think people "over virtualize". Nothing stopping you adding pfsense to another $50 PC you get from TM or I am sure you have something lying around.

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.