Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
540 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36


  Reply # 1556844 21-May-2016 15:55
Send private message

dafman:

 

ockel:

 

 

 

Are they anything like the sheep that keep bleating that they cancelled Sky weeks/months/years ago and feel the need to keep telling the world to self-justify their decision?

 

 

I think it's a pretty admirable human trait to warn off others if you discover what you consider to be a rip off. Keep up the good work all.

 

 

Thats's the thing though, it's a individuals decision based on the value proposition. You 'discovered'  a rip off and have to tell others, like they haven't evaluated this already.

 

My wife & I both watch sports a lot, and have HD netflix too. I don't like spending as much as we do (180 / month for Mysky with HD, sports, unlimited VDSL, HD 2 screen netflix) but we pay it to watch the sports we enjoy + comedy central, some discovery / Net Geo. 

 

 

 

And if I pay 170, whats another $10 to have my sports in 1080i so I can actually read player numbers when watching.

 

 


13149 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6171

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1556852 21-May-2016 16:04
Send private message

nathan:
bmt:

It's sad that HD has been around for over a decade and yet we are still getting SD TV broadcasts. Let alone being charged for HD pay TV content.


Speculating that HD content potentially costs more for Sky to buy, it wouldn't really make sense to turn around and make the HD ticket free as well. A double price hit.


On a side note, the CEOs for both Sky TV and Sky City both seem like absolute weasels. Coincidence..?


 



A CEO is legally obligated to maximise shareholder return

If you feel like you're being shafted stop paying? That is the problem here. All the sheep keep paying and paying and paying thru the nose


Why call folks who select a product sheep?




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


Webhead
2111 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 685

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1556854 21-May-2016 16:12
Send private message

Don't think its worth it. Don't think Sky is worth the money at all, which is why I stopped my Sky subscription nearly 2 years ago, have not regretted it for a second.

 

When I signed up for Sky I asked them what I would get with the HD-ticket, and was given wrong information. (They didn't tell me it was only for Sports and Movies, which I did not sign up for).





1779 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 625

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1556859 21-May-2016 16:22
Send private message

I don't think the HD ticket is worth it but I do require it to make sport worth watching. I'm 1 month in to my annual 3 month sky stand down.


109 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 3


  Reply # 1558602 24-May-2016 13:01
Send private message

HD ticket is definitely worth it.    Covers Sport, Movies, Soho and The Zone.




1394 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80


  Reply # 1558633 24-May-2016 13:33
Send private message

Hm. i might sign up for sky if they get EPL. But will hold out on the HD ticket for now. Can we try it before buying it sort of? just want to see if the difference is worth it


1397 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 201


  Reply # 1558636 24-May-2016 13:36
One person supports this post
Send private message

Krishant007:

 

Hm. i might sign up for sky if they get EPL. But will hold out on the HD ticket for now. Can we try it before buying it sort of? just want to see if the difference is worth it

 

 

Watch 3News at 6pm on TV3.   Then watch it one hour later on TV3+1.  See if you notice any difference.


2043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 337

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1558686 24-May-2016 14:30
One person supports this post
Send private message

Krishant007:

 

Hm. i might sign up for sky if they get EPL. But will hold out on the HD ticket for now. Can we try it before buying it sort of? just want to see if the difference is worth it

 

 

The SD transmissions are absolutely vulgar, so bad in fact I only watch HD channels.





Ross

 

Spark FibreMAX using Mikrotik CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+

 


Speed Test


11 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1560325 26-May-2016 22:35
Send private message

Once you watch Sport, Movies and the likes of HBO programmes in HD, you won't want to go back. The extra cost is irritating though....

2379 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1102

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1560454 27-May-2016 09:22
Send private message

Spyware:

 

Krishant007:

 

Hm. i might sign up for sky if they get EPL. But will hold out on the HD ticket for now. Can we try it before buying it sort of? just want to see if the difference is worth it

 

 

The SD transmissions are absolutely vulgar, so bad in fact I only watch HD channels.

 

 

I was at a friend's house last weekend. We were watching the rugby on Sky. The picture quality on his new Samsung 55" was akin to watching 1970s VHS. It was shocking.

 

I asked him how much he was paying - in excess of $100 per month. Yes, he could pay the extra to access the HD feed, but he doesn't want to pay any more than he is at the moment. I reckon with what he's paying, he should at least be able to get a decent picture up on his TV.

 

He's a rugby fan, so has been reluctant to ditch Sky ... which is the only real hold the company has on many current subscribers. I suggested he go to the pub on a Friday, have a couple of beers, watch the game in full HD, and still be financially better off at the end of the month.


540 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36


  Reply # 1560480 27-May-2016 09:39
Send private message

dafman:

 

Spyware:

 

Krishant007:

 

Hm. i might sign up for sky if they get EPL. But will hold out on the HD ticket for now. Can we try it before buying it sort of? just want to see if the difference is worth it

 

 

The SD transmissions are absolutely vulgar, so bad in fact I only watch HD channels.

 

 

I was at a friend's house last weekend. We were watching the rugby on Sky. The picture quality on his new Samsung 55" was akin to watching 1970s VHS. It was shocking.

 

I asked him how much he was paying - in excess of $100 per month. Yes, he could pay the extra to access the HD feed, but he doesn't want to pay any more than he is at the moment. I reckon with what he's paying, he should at least be able to get a decent picture up on his TV.

 

He's a rugby fan, so has been reluctant to ditch Sky ... which is the only real hold the company has on many current subscribers. I suggested he go to the pub on a Friday, have a couple of beers, watch the game in full HD, and still be financially better off at the end of the month.

 

 

So you are saying the HD ticket is indeed worth it? (for the highest picture quality) Especially if you are already paying that much for Sky. 


2043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 337

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1560493 27-May-2016 09:47
One person supports this post
Send private message

HD ticket is all that makes Sky a usable service currently on any modern TV. Once Sky switch all transponders to DVB-S2 H.264 the SD quality will improve but that could be a year away.





Ross

 

Spark FibreMAX using Mikrotik CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+

 


Speed Test


7875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 790

Subscriber

  Reply # 1560518 27-May-2016 10:34
Send private message

When my M-in-Law had her old STB replaced with the new MySky type I  took one look at the picture quality  on the Sports Channels and went online and upgraded  to the HD ticket and the improvement  was really noticeable.   Wonder if as the roll out proceeds whether Sky will deliberately downgrade the PQ on the SD feed  (Mpeg 2) to get people to go to the HD ticket??





Regards,

Old3eyes


21465 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1560565 27-May-2016 11:14
One person supports this post
Send private message

old3eyes:

 

When my M-in-Law had her old STB replaced with the new MySky type I  took one look at the picture quality  on the Sports Channels and went online and upgraded  to the HD ticket and the improvement  was really noticeable.   Wonder if as the roll out proceeds whether Sky will deliberately downgrade the PQ on the SD feed  (Mpeg 2) to get people to go to the HD ticket??

 

 

I dont think they can drop it much more and still have text readable at least some of the time.

 

Surely the advertisers at sporting events want viewers to at least be able to recognize their brands, any lower and it will have the brands and players faces like they are blocked out intentionally.





Richard rich.ms

2043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 337

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1560932 27-May-2016 20:08
Send private message

The quality of the mpeg2 streams was downgraded in 1998, i.e., at launch.





Ross

 

Spark FibreMAX using Mikrotik CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+

 


Speed Test


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.