Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
13326 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1587


  Reply # 1885781 18-Oct-2017 16:10
Send private message quote this post

sbiddle:

 

Sport is the one reason I feel sorry for the Sky.

 

The world has moved to a model where Pay TV providers fund sport - and without Sky the simple reality is NZ Rugby and the All Blacks would not be the brand that they are today.

 

Unless somebody else is going to step up and fund the tens of millions that go directly from Sky then FTA coverage can never happen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is one revenue stream, however there are also others such as advertising and sponsorships. But even if it was on FTA, the sport would still get money as it would be the taxpayer paying for it, as well as TV advertsing. eg The cost is shared across a far larger viewer base,so more viewers and more advertising money being spent due to more eyeballs.

 

 

 

IMO, as taxpayer money actually goes to fund a lot of these sports, such as the olympics, they are events of national significance and should be on FTA TV. This is proven by other countries who have this written into legislation, so no matter whether you are rich or poor, you can enjoy these sports on FTA TV.

 

 

 

I used to be into watching sport a lot when I was younger, but since most has moved to paytv, I have lost a lot of interest in them. I also don't think professionalism has been great for the actual sports either, unless you equate making lots of money off the sport as success. But there is far more to sport than just money. It is supposed to be a social healthy activity to get people out there being active.


25586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5363

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Subscriber

  Reply # 1885868 18-Oct-2017 18:33
Send private message quote this post

mattwnz:

 

It is one revenue stream, however there are also others such as advertising and sponsorships. But even if it was on FTA, the sport would still get money as it would be the taxpayer paying for it, as well as TV advertsing. eg The cost is shared across a far larger viewer base,so more viewers and more advertising money being spent due to more eyeballs.

 

 

 

IMO, as taxpayer money actually goes to fund a lot of these sports, such as the olympics, they are events of national significance and should be on FTA TV. This is proven by other countries who have this written into legislation, so no matter whether you are rich or poor, you can enjoy these sports on FTA TV.

 

 

 

The Olympics haven't been FTA for a number of years. Why? Because FTA networks can't afford them.

 

It's all find pushing for these events to be on FTA TV but the reasons they aren't all come back to one thing - $$

 

It's fine saying other countries with a population 5x higher than ours can have the events on FTA TV. The rights cost the same so that means the effective cost is far less. Do you think the government should be spending somewhere in the vicinity of $100+ million per year just to fund FTA events of "national significance"?

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 


5839 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2677

Subscriber

  Reply # 1885886 18-Oct-2017 19:01
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

sbiddle:

 

It's fine saying other countries with a population 5x higher than ours can have the events on FTA TV. The rights cost the same so that means the effective cost is far less. Do you think the government should be spending somewhere in the vicinity of $100+ million per year just to fund FTA events of "national significance"?

 

 

And why this idiotic situation where you have one rights region the size of America, with nearly 400 million people, then another limited to New Zealand, with less than 5 million? How can that be fair, or even sensible?

 

I am utterly against this regionalised nonsense as a matter of principle, but f you have to have it, at the very least there should be a 'pacific' region including us, Australia, and the islands. Then may be we could afford these ridiculous sports rights.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


10023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576

Trusted

  Reply # 1885934 18-Oct-2017 19:59
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Sky pays the big dollars and as thats spread over its almost 800,000 users, (as Basic subsidises sport) thats one way. If it was spread across all FTA users, i.e. every TV household, thats cheaper. If that was cheaper, but many wont pay as they arent into sport, or that sport. Taxpayers will complain that rivers can be cleaned, etc, etc instead of airing free rugby.  

 

No easy answer, as many want everything for nix.


10023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576

Trusted

  Reply # 1885936 18-Oct-2017 20:01
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

sbiddle:

 

It's fine saying other countries with a population 5x higher than ours can have the events on FTA TV. The rights cost the same so that means the effective cost is far less. Do you think the government should be spending somewhere in the vicinity of $100+ million per year just to fund FTA events of "national significance"?

 

 

And why this idiotic situation where you have one rights region the size of America, with nearly 400 million people, then another limited to New Zealand, with less than 5 million? How can that be fair, or even sensible?

 

I am utterly against this regionalised nonsense as a matter of principle, but f you have to have it, at the very least there should be a 'pacific' region including us, Australia, and the islands. Then may be we could afford these ridiculous sports rights.

 

 

 

 

I would have thought that rights to NZ would be cheaper than AUS, or anywhere else bigger. Probably more expensive per capita though. 


1336 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 132

Subscriber

  Reply # 1885945 18-Oct-2017 20:24
Send private message quote this post

Or in some cases such as the docos, Sky appear to purchase from an Aus network as I'd imagine the rights for those are sold at a regional level that is too great for us.


5839 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2677

Subscriber

  Reply # 1885955 18-Oct-2017 20:58
Send private message quote this post

sbiddle's point is that we can't afford FTA rights for big events because our population is too small. My point is that if we were  part of Australia and more for this purpose then our population might be big enough.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


10023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576

Trusted

  Reply # 1886019 19-Oct-2017 06:42
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

sbiddle's point is that we can't afford FTA rights for big events because our population is too small. My point is that if we were  part of Australia and more for this purpose then our population might be big enough.

 

 

 

 

If that happened, the content owners will take a revenue cut, and I dont see that happening


5839 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2677

Subscriber

  Reply # 1886052 19-Oct-2017 09:06
Send private message quote this post

Let us all shed a tear for the poor, suffering content owners. Maybe there is a reason there is so much piracy.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


7654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 1886079 19-Oct-2017 09:27
Send private message quote this post

vexxxboy:

 

Rikkitic:

 

I don't think it is even just a Sky issue. All who are in any way involved in commercial television in this country should be shaking in their boots. Every young person I know is absorbed by either gaming or YouTube. I know several who have aerial or cable TV connections that they have never bothered to hook up. They just don't see the need. I think traditional linear broadcast TV is an old person's game, and when we all die out, there won't be anyone left to watch it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and who is meant to provide all the content that Netflix etc rely on .

 

 

The same people who supply it to the networks now.  i.e. CBS supplies to Netflix Star Trek Discovery to Netflix. 





Regards,

Old3eyes


35 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1886109 19-Oct-2017 09:53
Send private message quote this post

Going by that atleast I know how little they care for All Whites, Phoenix, NZF Prem Teams.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28


Vodafone says Internet of Things (IoT) crucial for digital transformation
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:06


Police and Facebook launch AMBER Alerts system in NZ
Posted 9-Nov-2017 10:49


Amazon debuts Fire TV Stick Basic Edition in over 100 new countries
Posted 8-Nov-2017 05:34


Vodafone VoIP transition to start this month
Posted 7-Nov-2017 12:33


Spark enhances IoT network capability
Posted 7-Nov-2017 11:33



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.