Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


1093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171


Topic # 231861 16-Mar-2018 22:26
3 people support this post
Send private message

The Optus 10 satellite has been moved from 164E to 160E its now there alongside Optus D1. This extra capacity should enable both Freeview and SKY to do complete upgrades to HD.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
2666 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 377

Trusted

  Reply # 1978886 16-Mar-2018 22:37
One person supports this post
Send private message

What happens when D1 is end-of-lifed?




1093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171


  Reply # 1978927 17-Mar-2018 03:21
Send private message

Im not sure if D1 is staying at 160E to be co-located with Optus 10. Will need to wait and get it confirmed.

 

The Optus 10 satellite can broadcast in the 11700-12200 band with D1 doing 12250-12750 the same as the current setup at the 156E orbital Optus slot. Where they have the older Optus C1 and the newer Optus D3 co-located.

 

 

 

 


2009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 161

Trusted

  Reply # 1978980 17-Mar-2018 11:38
Send private message

Apsattv:

 

Im not sure if D1 is staying at 160E to be co-located with Optus 10. Will need to wait and get it confirmed.

 

The Optus 10 satellite can broadcast in the 11700-12200 band with D1 doing 12250-12750 the same as the current setup at the 156E orbital Optus slot. Where they have the older Optus C1 and the newer Optus D3 co-located.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anything official on this from Optus? I was really surprised to see Optus 10 go into the 164E slot to begin with given the additional capacity needed in 160E





Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat New Zealand as a Solution Architect for all things Linux, Virtual and of course Cloud. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.

2026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 330

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1978984 17-Mar-2018 11:45
Send private message

Optus D1 once switched to DVB-S2 will have ample capacity using H.264. Usable bandwidth effectively doubles. From 10 x SD channels per half mux to 20 (at current quality). If simulcast are dropped even more free space. HD upgrade will take time, currently only foreign sourced HD stream playout is ESPN, beIN and other sport. Sky aren't going to suddenly pay more for HD versions of Discovery, CNN etc. when an additional expense is involved.


2666 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 377

Trusted

  Reply # 1979057 17-Mar-2018 16:14
Send private message

When is Sky going to change fully to DVB-S2? Is the satellite box upgrade process still happening?


1350 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 211


  Reply # 1979128 17-Mar-2018 18:44
Send private message

DjShadow:

When is Sky going to change fully to DVB-S2? Is the satellite box upgrade process still happening?



I'm wondering the same thing. Though I'm getting to the point of thinking except for Sports Sky starting to look like a lost cause. Seems to be a company that doesn't make progress very well.

Why are downloads SD as well on the Sky on demand, I might have subscribed to starter since the downloads are add free, but not while it's way below broadcast quality.



1093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171


  Reply # 1979210 17-Mar-2018 21:58
Send private message

 

 

The satellite at 164E was mostly used for backhaul celluler sites in outback Australia.  When Optus 10 replaced it m it was fully loaded up.

 

It was noted the other week all services had left, lyngsat and other tracking sites have it at 160E already.

 

This scan I did the other day from Perth also confirms, ignore the satellite header at the top saying intelsat19 i  forgot to rename it

 

 

 

 

 


1769 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 895


  Reply # 1979279 18-Mar-2018 12:42
Send private message

What makes you think Freeview would pay the substantial extra costs to go HD on sat? 

 

Not sure who actually funds Freeview...but it does seem to run on a showstring budget.


1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 182

Subscriber

  Reply # 1979281 18-Mar-2018 12:46
One person supports this post
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

What makes you think Freeview would pay the substantial extra costs to go HD on sat? 

 

Not sure who actually funds Freeview...but it does seem to run on a showstring budget.

 

 

Any idea how substantial it would be ? I would have thought (in my unknowledgeable way) if the money was found for terrestrial HD, it could be found for the satellite variety.





rb99


19 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 1979282 18-Mar-2018 12:54
Send private message

Spyware:

 

Optus D1 once switched to DVB-S2 will have ample capacity using H.264. Usable bandwidth effectively doubles.

 

 

So I have a question. Why the hell haven't they done that already? I thought they kept those MPEG-2 channels because the older decoders couldn't do DVB-S2, but now that Sky have replaced all those older decoders, that shouldn't be a problem... right? I can understand how Sky is cheap as sh*t and doesn't want to pay for the HD versions of Discovery, Fox News and so on, but surely they can just get the SD versions of those channels and just broadcast them in H.264?

 

It's 2018, it's just insane how Sky STILL uses MPEG-2. It makes absolutely NO SENSE. It's laughable.




1093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171


  Reply # 1979487 18-Mar-2018 22:53
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

What makes you think Freeview would pay the substantial extra costs to go HD on sat? 

 

Not sure who actually funds Freeview...but it does seem to run on a showstring budget.

 

 

What "substantial extra costs" to go HD are you talking about? the additional cost of simulcasting on a second transponder? They would need the extra capacity for at least 1 year so can remain running the sd service with a shutoff date.

 

I would expect at a minimum they would need 1 new t.p split in the same arrangment.

 

The existing encoders can process HD easily enough so theres probably no need for any hardware upgrade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




1093 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 171


  Reply # 1979488 18-Mar-2018 22:56
Send private message

bobwinters:

 

Spyware:

 

Optus D1 once switched to DVB-S2 will have ample capacity using H.264. Usable bandwidth effectively doubles.

 

 

So I have a question. Why the hell haven't they done that already? I thought they kept those MPEG-2 channels because the older decoders couldn't do DVB-S2, but now that Sky have replaced all those older decoders, that shouldn't be a problem... right? I can understand how Sky is cheap as sh*t and doesn't want to pay for the HD versions of Discovery, Fox News and so on, but surely they can just get the SD versions of those channels and just broadcast them in H.264?

 

It's 2018, it's just insane how Sky STILL uses MPEG-2. It makes absolutely NO SENSE. It's laughable.

 

 

Yes it should of been done and dusted 2 to 3 Years ago..!

 

I wonder if they delayed in knowing that the Optus 10 satellite was being shifted with slightly improved power levels. The DVB-S2 format is much more fussy with the required signal levels to have stable reception.

 

an overnight transfer of all sky t.p to dvb -s2 is going to be fun, when previously working setups suddenly have signal issues.

 

 

 

 

 

 


402 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 105


  Reply # 1979816 19-Mar-2018 12:56
Send private message

Spyware:

 

Sky aren't going to suddenly pay more for HD versions of Discovery, CNN etc. when an additional expense is involved.

 

 

Yet Sky have no issues slugging customers $9.99 per month for the HD access ticket. Surely this fee is to cover the costs of HD sourced content as well as the extra satellite capacity needed for HD broadcasts.

 

 


731 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1983069 25-Mar-2018 22:15
Send private message

I hope maybe sky will do 4k soon




               The Biggest and the Best.

7861 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 789

Subscriber

  Reply # 1983125 26-Mar-2018 08:03
Send private message

cws82us: I hope maybe sky will do 4k soon

Can't see it in Sky's lifetime.




Regards,

Old3eyes


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.