Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
14813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2771

Trusted

  Reply # 2149210 22-Dec-2018 10:04
Send private message quote this post

dafman:

 

tdgeek:

 

Sky and Netflix don't compete.

 

 

With the exception of sport, they compete.

 

And if sport wasn't the exception, one would be gone by lunchtime.

 

 

Ok, that's true, but lets be frank, who would pay $20 for the MySky box, let alone the subs for Basic to watch FTA and a few other channels? Most use a Freeview box. Its all about sport these days, you like that type of content or not. 


1501 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 227


  Reply # 2149212 22-Dec-2018 10:07
Send private message quote this post

sdavisnz: https://www.itwire.com/entertainment/84008-netflix-nz-subscribers-closing-in-on-2-million-mark.html


That's viewers, not subscribers. Cos Sky clearly doesn't have 1.6m subscribers. What's Roy Morgans assumption for viewers per hh?

So how many subscribers? Cos it's not 2m, is it?

 
 
 
 


2152 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 398

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2149213 22-Dec-2018 10:09
Send private message quote this post

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Sky pay for SD steams, i.e., news, documentary etc. are fed to Sky in SD. Channel 5 is local so could playout in HD but they don't have the equipment. HD versions of NatGeo and Discovery are actually different products with different content.


14813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2771

Trusted

  Reply # 2149214 22-Dec-2018 10:12
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Ive read here that they cant output more HD due to satellite restrictions. Whatever they have that is in HD that isn't "satellited" in HD, you would expect it will be over broadband.


2152 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 398

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2149217 22-Dec-2018 10:20
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Ive read here that they cant output more HD due to satellite restrictions. Whatever they have that is in HD that isn't "satellited" in HD, you would expect it will be over broadband.

 

 

It's already been stated on here many times that Sky can shift 5 transponders to DVB-S2. Shift increases effective bandwidth by 100% (also change of codec from mpeg2 to H.264). Hence why they can drop from 7 to 4 transponders in Optus contract. They choose not to as would be pointless since they have no HD versions of the bulk of the channels due to frugality. And no playout equipment either.




2761 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 419

Trusted

  Reply # 2149228 22-Dec-2018 10:44
Send private message quote this post

Spyware:

 

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Sky pay for SD steams, i.e., news, documentary etc. are fed to Sky in SD. Channel 5 is local so could playout in HD but they don't have the equipment. HD versions of NatGeo and Discovery are actually different products with different content.

 

 

They must have something as they are doing local live (in studio) Sports shows in HD as well as playback in HD


958 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 628

Trusted

  Reply # 2149229 22-Dec-2018 10:48
Send private message quote this post

DjShadow:

 

Spyware:

 

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Sky pay for SD steams, i.e., news, documentary etc. are fed to Sky in SD. Channel 5 is local so could playout in HD but they don't have the equipment. HD versions of NatGeo and Discovery are actually different products with different content.

 

 

They must have something as they are doing local live (in studio) Sports shows in HD as well as playback in HD

 

 

 

 

They 100% do have the equipment as they produce their sports content in HD and also Prime.


64 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 13


  Reply # 2149231 22-Dec-2018 11:20
Send private message quote this post

Andib:

 

DjShadow:

 

Spyware:

 

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Sky pay for SD steams, i.e., news, documentary etc. are fed to Sky in SD. Channel 5 is local so could playout in HD but they don't have the equipment. HD versions of NatGeo and Discovery are actually different products with different content.

 

 

They must have something as they are doing local live (in studio) Sports shows in HD as well as playback in HD

 

 

 

 

They 100% do have the equipment as they produce their sports content in HD and also Prime.

 

 

How much is that equipment is available though? I'd say not much if any at all. 


1501 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 227


  Reply # 2149233 22-Dec-2018 11:44
Send private message quote this post

darthmeow:

 

Andib:

 

DjShadow:

 

Spyware:

 

DjShadow:

 

Once the new Android TV product is available, would it be safe to assume Sky will show all channels in HD assuming that is how they are fed to Sky? Or would it just be a carbon copy of what is on the Satellite pic qual wise?

 

 

Sky pay for SD steams, i.e., news, documentary etc. are fed to Sky in SD. Channel 5 is local so could playout in HD but they don't have the equipment. HD versions of NatGeo and Discovery are actually different products with different content.

 

 

They must have something as they are doing local live (in studio) Sports shows in HD as well as playback in HD

 

 

 

 

They 100% do have the equipment as they produce their sports content in HD and also Prime.

 

 

How much is that equipment is available though? I'd say not much if any at all. 

 

 

Studios at Panorama Rd are HD.  And OSB has 6 HD units  https://osb.co.nz/#aboutoutsidebroadcastingnewzealand


2152 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 398

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2149237 22-Dec-2018 12:10
Send private message quote this post

OK then please give me some other reason that 5 and Vibe are not played out in HD if indeed all equipment has been purchased and is in place. Why hasn't DVB-S2 shift occurred?? Please tell us.


1506 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 261


  Reply # 2149278 22-Dec-2018 12:46
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:


Ok, that's true, but lets be frank, who would pay $20 for the MySky box, let alone the subs for Basic to watch FTA and a few other channels? Most use a Freeview box. Its all about sport these days, you like that type of content or not. 



Me, lol.

When no deals on I just use digital rental about $20 a month per box.
Sky Box way superior to Freeview box’s on market, and record a lot of Freeview.

Sky Box very quiet and can record more channels at once then latest Freeview recorder on market.

Edit: if TiVo was still around it might be different, that box was fantastic.

1501 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 227


  Reply # 2149294 22-Dec-2018 13:34
Send private message quote this post

Spyware:

OK then please give me some other reason that 5 and Vibe are not played out in HD if indeed all equipment has been purchased and is in place. Why hasn't DVB-S2 shift occurred?? Please tell us.



I'll guess it's because the incremental revenue from advertising in HD (cf SD) plus the incremental revenue from additional hd subscribers is less than the cost of hd content (cf sd). It would be highly likely that a business case has looked at the differential cashflows from such a proposal.
Wrt DVB-S2, who knows. All the old boxes have been swapped out, maybe waiting on new CEO signoff?

369 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 71


  Reply # 2149297 22-Dec-2018 13:41
Send private message quote this post

It's interesting that often when I'm amongst a group of people discussing Netflix and Sky that one or two admit that they pay for Netflix but haven't viewed anything on it for months. Can't recall such statements in relation to Sky.

1605 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 838


  Reply # 2149328 22-Dec-2018 15:41
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

kiwiharry: It's interesting that often when I'm amongst a group of people discussing Netflix and Sky that one or two admit that they pay for Netflix but haven't viewed anything on it for months. Can't recall such statements in relation to Sky.

 

That could be due to the price difference - spending $12 per month on something you don't use is very different to $100 or whatever Sky is these days.

 

Actually, the main reason I dropped Sky about four years ago was the realization that the only things we were watching on it were on the Freeview channels, ie we hadn't watched anything on the Sky service itself for several months.  I guess we could have dropped to the $20 recorder only tariff, but history of paying for the basic package, then more for the recorder, then more again for HD (which as it turned out, wasn't even necessary for free channels) just made me feel they'd had enough of my money already.


14813 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2771

Trusted

  Reply # 2149403 22-Dec-2018 18:40
Send private message quote this post

shk292:

 

kiwiharry: It's interesting that often when I'm amongst a group of people discussing Netflix and Sky that one or two admit that they pay for Netflix but haven't viewed anything on it for months. Can't recall such statements in relation to Sky.

 

That could be due to the price difference - spending $12 per month on something you don't use is very different to $100 or whatever Sky is these days.

 

Actually, the main reason I dropped Sky about four years ago was the realization that the only things we were watching on it were on the Freeview channels, ie we hadn't watched anything on the Sky service itself for several months.  I guess we could have dropped to the $20 recorder only tariff, but history of paying for the basic package, then more for the recorder, then more again for HD (which as it turned out, wasn't even necessary for free channels) just made me feel they'd had enough of my money already.

 

 

And that's absolutely fine. What annoys me is this who ditch Sky then rant about it. Ive got Sky, Netflix, Lightbox, Curiositystream. I don't watch much SVOD but its there. Sky is sport, but I enjoy the doco channels and CNN, so it suits me. Those that dont want Sky, the content doesn't suit, why are they here complaining?? I have a Honda car, a Suzuki motorcycle , you dont see me searching for forums to bag every other car and motorcycle brand. 


1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.