Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
66 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 325963 3-May-2010 10:56
Send private message

It dosent seem to be a huge increase - now $20 a month more I'd be complaining! My partner and I were offered a "6 month half price deal" that in reality was no cheaper than the basic package - and we only want nat geo, discovery, and CI! So who cares if we get free sports? So No sky for us its just not worth it.

We dont mind the small increase with telecom either, its not significat unlike the mentioned power companies policies of huge hikes! (When we bought them the infrastrucure in the first place).

Now all these people moaning about Big Time - its always you get what you pay for - so if you want unlimited internet to download your pirated movies and games, and dont want to pay - put up with the speed issues. Otherwise actually pay for something for once! (And I'd love a CPI pay increase lol never got one of those !)

5169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1095

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 325966 3-May-2010 11:34
Send private message

Kyanar: Just got a letter from Sky saying they're raising prices.  Should be about $1.20 extra a month (same as Telecom, really).

Anyone else notice that Sky only seems to raise the price when Telecom does?


Now I'm saving even MORE money by not having Sky!

Thanks, Sky! Better value every time.  




____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


424 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 325968 3-May-2010 11:41
Send private message

Linuxluver:
Kyanar: Just got a letter from Sky saying they're raising prices.  Should be about $1.20 extra a month (same as Telecom, really).

Anyone else notice that Sky only seems to raise the price when Telecom does?


Now I'm saving even MORE money by not having Sky!

Thanks, Sky! Better value every time.  


Yeah, me too with that one.  Never bought Sky, never will.  What I don't understand is how 90% of the US has cable.  Collectively, they must watch a hell of a lot of TV, to justify the cost. 

7858 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 789

Subscriber

  Reply # 325987 3-May-2010 12:35
Send private message

timestyles:
Linuxluver:
Kyanar: Just got a letter from Sky saying they're raising prices.  Should be about $1.20 extra a month (same as Telecom, really).

Anyone else notice that Sky only seems to raise the price when Telecom does?


Now I'm saving even MORE money by not having Sky!

Thanks, Sky! Better value every time.  



Yeah, me too with that one.  Never bought Sky, never will.  What I don't understand is how 90% of the US has cable.  Collectively, they must watch a hell of a lot of TV, to justify the cost. 


That cable service also provides fone and broadband service not just TV..




Regards,

Old3eyes


638 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 78

Trusted

  Reply # 326243 4-May-2010 07:46
Send private message

FreakyKiwi: It dosent seem to be a huge increase - now $20 a month more I'd be complaining! My partner and I were offered a "6 month half price deal" that in reality was no cheaper than the basic package - and we only want nat geo, discovery, and CI! So who cares if we get free sports? So No sky for us its just not worth it.

We dont mind the small increase with telecom either, its not significat unlike the mentioned power companies policies of huge hikes! (When we bought them the infrastrucure in the first place).

Now all these people moaning about Big Time - its always you get what you pay for - so if you want unlimited internet to download your pirated movies and games, and dont want to pay - put up with the speed issues. Otherwise actually pay for something for once! (And I'd love a CPI pay increase lol never got one of those !)


Someone else said it - Sky is a luxury.  If the cost:benefit isn't there, they're not going to get our business.

I had Sky several years ago (due to no realistic other option for TV reception) and was utterily put off by the service we received.  Since then my domestic situation has changed (married with kids!) and we can no longer afford to throw that kind of money away on TV.

That all said, all vendors adjust prices occaisionally and $1.20/mo isn't a huge amount on average.  Thing is, I wouldn't put $40 a month into Sky, so $41.20 is a no brainer :)

OTOH should I ever become rich, perhaps i'll fork out for the extra $1.20 :)




1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.