Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 489086 4-Jul-2011 11:04
Send private message

The monopolist then makes it impossible for new entries to the market and the result is less choice for consumers.






On this basis, Sky does not have a monopoly

7659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 489128 4-Jul-2011 12:44
Send private message

tdgeek:
The monopolist then makes it impossible for new entries to the market and the result is less choice for consumers.







On this basis, Sky does not have a monopoly


How do you come to that conclusion??




Regards,

Old3eyes


 
 
 
 


453 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 489129 4-Jul-2011 12:45
Send private message

tdgeekMaybe the govt can pass a law to take over Sky then make it FTA 

.


So, what you're saying is that you're quite happy to pay for the content as long as everyone pays for it? Where does a persons freedom of choice lay there?


Unless you have some other magic place that taxpayer money comes from - other than planting a beanstalk.   


    

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 489143 4-Jul-2011 13:08
Send private message

Byrned:
tdgeekMaybe the govt can pass a law to take over Sky then make it FTA 

.


So, what you're saying is that you're quite happy to pay for the content as long as everyone pays for it? Where does a persons freedom of choice lay there?


Unless you have some other magic place that taxpayer money comes from - other than planting a beanstalk.     



All content is bid for, there is no Sky lockout that I am aware of. I recall Sky paid $2.3 million for the netball, TVNZ offered $700,000, so Sky got the content. Thats not a monopoly situation TV NZ should have bid more.

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 489149 4-Jul-2011 13:14
Send private message

Byrned:
tdgeekMaybe the govt can pass a law to take over Sky then make it FTA 

.


So, what you're saying is that you're quite happy to pay for the content as long as everyone pays for it? Where does a persons freedom of choice lay there?


Unless you have some other magic place that taxpayer money comes from - other than planting a beanstalk.       




I agree fully. My post was a while back and was in response to someone complaining about Sky, my response was tongue in cheek. A lot of people seem to want everything for nothing, or they want everything to fit into their needs. If for example my "suggestion" happened, then everyoen would be happy as Sky would then be free. But, as you imply, someone has to pay.

My argument is that Sky pays for content and bills the users, what is wrong with that? Other providers can buy the same content, and at times they do. Wimbledon is a good recent example.

499 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 152


  Reply # 489152 4-Jul-2011 13:17
Send private message

tdgeek:
Byrned:
tdgeekMaybe the govt can pass a law to take over Sky then make it FTA 

.


So, what you're saying is that you're quite happy to pay for the content as long as everyone pays for it? Where does a persons freedom of choice lay there?


Unless you have some other magic place that taxpayer money comes from - other than planting a beanstalk.     



All content is bid for, there is no Sky lockout that I am aware of. I recall Sky paid $2.3 million for the netball, TVNZ offered $700,000, so Sky got the content. Thats not a monopoly situation TV NZ should have bid more.

Sky's monopoly postion enables them to dominate the market by being able to bid more - consequently pricing competitors out of the market.




Amanon

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 489157 4-Jul-2011 13:28
Send private message

How did they get Wimbledon then?

Clearly Pay TV has a better business model than FTA, there is nothing to stop TVNZ having a pay TV component. Remember, some things cost more, someone has to pay

938 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 489193 4-Jul-2011 14:44
Send private message

I want a better pay per view option in all of this. I refuse to spend money on Sky's entire line up, but would like to buy selected movies, sports etc.

I guess this will eventually come via the intertubes but it annoys me as I want it now.

Also according to Merriam Webster dictionary (.com version) the definition of a monopoly is:


1: exclusive ownership through legal privilege, command of supply, or concerted action

2: exclusive possession or control


3: a commodity controlled by one party


4: one that has a monopoly

Bit different to the tests the ComCom applies, but in general if you have a competitive advantage you have a monopoly. Often we grant monopolies on purpose to encourage investment: patents, copyright, auctions of public goods (eg. emf spectrum), information assymetry (eg. healthcare), agency theory etc.

The problem we run into is that a monopoly can charge monopoly rents. This occurs when a lack of competition means that we do not pay an efficient price for a good or service.

This creates waste in the system that could otherwise be put to productive good (there are less common issues here but they happen much more rarely and include refusal to provide servce - TSO is a good example of legislation to prevent this).

Therefore it is in the public (general sense of the word) interest that we get the most production from a given dollar. I think there are a few tests in order to justify legislative entry into a market:

Size of company share in the market (definitions are the big gotcha here)
Ability to purchase similar goods (substitutes)
Barrier to entry of competitors
Likely cost of the monopoly to the public

Sky TV creates a barrier to entry based on exclusive content agreements, installed base of satellite receivers and satellite capacity, so could probably be classed as a monopoly.

However I guess we would only see the ComCom regulate SKY TV if they were the only pay tv provider in NZ and bought all the content exclusively and then used predatory pricing to bankrupt any competitors, otherwise it is unlikely due to the significant costs of regulation.





7659 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 489306 4-Jul-2011 18:46
Send private message

tdgeek: How did they get Wimbledon then?


Clearly Pay TV has a better business model than FTA, there is nothing to stop TVNZ having a pay TV component. Remember, some things cost more, someone has to pay


Most likely because it was in the middle of the nite and unlike rugby not many people would watch it live at that time..




Regards,

Old3eyes


10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 489313 4-Jul-2011 19:00
Send private message

Disagree fully. The only means that you can establish control is if Sky owned all of the transmission capability by satellite. They dont but if they owned enough to effectively limit any others then that is an issue of control. Other than that I see nohing that smacks of monopolistic control. Although exclusive content is mentioned, well that applies to many content types. If Sky or TVNZ or anyone else secured say F1 for 3 years then that is exclusive control, but that is standard. Thats a supply contract, then it expires.


805 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 493769 15-Jul-2011 16:05
Send private message

When can we expect some more details on this deal?

272 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 496387 21-Jul-2011 19:44
Send private message

tdgeek: Disagree fully. The only means that you can establish control is if Sky owned all of the transmission capability by satellite. They dont but if they owned enough to effectively limit any others then that is an issue of control. Other than that I see nohing that smacks of monopolistic control. Although exclusive content is mentioned, well that applies to many content types. If Sky or TVNZ or anyone else secured say F1 for 3 years then that is exclusive control, but that is standard. Thats a supply contract, then it expires.


I'm sure I've said this already, but:

"Cornering the market" is an anticompetitive practice that is subject to regulatory intervention. The test for anticompetitive practice is undue ability to influence pricing in a market. When two corporates wish to merge, their combined market share may be nowhere near 100% but they can still be blocked because of the potential negative market impact.

To analogise, if you own more than 50% of the property in a township then it doesn't matter if you came by these properties fairly in openly contested sales - the net effect is that you are in a position to massively influence both property and rental prices.

In the township of live/delayed professional sports coverage, there are only a handful of properties that aren't owned exclusively by Sky, so they effectively control pricing of this content. This kind of situation is one that many countries have sought to address.




A time-poor geek is hardly a geek at all

1032 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 43

Trusted

  Reply # 496393 21-Jul-2011 19:52
Send private message

Nicely put compost! Smile

10033 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1584

Trusted

  Reply # 496425 21-Jul-2011 21:19
Send private message

---In the township of live/delayed professional sports coverage, there are only a handful of properties that aren't owned exclusively by Sky, so they effectively control pricing of this content. This kind of situation is one that many countries have sought to address.---


Ok, then the Freeview/TVNZ company needs to outbid Sky to obtain more properties. They can do that, and have done so in the past. Sky does not have content locked down. It bought the rights, as TVNZ can do. Yes, good content has moved to Sky. Why? TVNZ chose not to pay the required price as it will then have a profit problem. It cannot ask too much for advertising, and it has chosen to be a free to air provider, so by its own choice it has limited its capability to offer content, as it chooses to forego a revenue stream. It could have paid the price for content, recovered some by way of premium advertising, and made the balance up by making its premium content pay per view.

That woud be a sound business model to compete with Sky. What if Sky chose not to get some top content? Do you think free to air TV can buy it and show it for free?

251 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  Reply # 498312 27-Jul-2011 00:56
Send private message

mattRSK: When can we expect some more details on this deal?


+1

I searched for 'sky' on Telecom's website, and I'm almost certain the last time I looked (last week maybe?) that this page wasn't there. It looks to me like it was created yesterday, am I reading that wrong? If it is new, is it a sign that some more info will be forthcoming shortly?




~~Dream.Catcher~~
iPhone 4s 16 GB, Ipad2 32gb
windows 7 computer


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Phone prices rising as users move upmarket
Posted 24-Nov-2017 17:16


Talking net neutrality on RNZ Nine-to-Noon
Posted 24-Nov-2017 12:11


Air New Zealand experiments with blockchain technology
Posted 23-Nov-2017 15:39


Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.