Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
3404 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 399

Trusted

  Reply # 821990 19-May-2013 16:10
Send private message

freitasm: You being in total control means higher costs. CIOs will go lower costs if they can.



A lot of CIOs would not. Even getting NZ based cloud providers into many companies is very difficult even with ultra strict contracts and complete review of infrastructure, policies etc.







BDFL - Memuneh
61179 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11958

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 822005 19-May-2013 16:52
Send private message

I come from mainframes. When I started working in IT, back in 1985 everything was run from inside a glass room, some the size of houses or buildings, with green monitors connected via 300 bps lines via satellite - sometimes not even that. Over the years what pushed new technology was one thing only: costs.

When I first saw a CP/M machine running DB II and I told one of the folks in my company "Wow, this is going to change the world" they looked at me and chuckled. I was young then, only 18 years old but I was one of the younger ones to work with computers around that time. And I was right then. Most of that people  from back then are now gone into something else. They turned into dinosaurs, away from IT because they simply couldn't move with the times.

We are at a moment where hardware is such a commodity that the biggest costs are software, processes and people. Maintaining people structure, training, hiring, replacing costs more than anything else. Software maintenance is not cheap.

For many people moving to the cloud (which is not much different now in concept than using a time sharing bureau of 30 years ago) means huge savings.

People may not want to move to the cloud because they don't like change. But at some point these costs I talked about just before are going to be so high that CIOs all around will just be pressured by stakeholders to do it.

There's no way against it.




1228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152


  Reply # 822080 19-May-2013 18:58
Send private message

Agree, I had one client who had an SBS server installed, 6 months later when my company started looking after them we did a cost benefit analysis and even though they were still paying off the SBS server on a monthly basis it only took 6 months to show cost benefits with office 365 and significant cost savings moving forward + significant extra $ when they sold the box.

Their main PC went down last month (failed hdd) so put in new drive reinstall office and sky drive configure, now back up and running no loss of data.

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.