Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 122118 25-Jun-2013 12:54
Send private message

Just discovered someone has made a painting of one of my photographs. While it is flattering, it also raises questions about copyright law.

Here is the photo and artwork in question.

Photo: 




Painting:




Anyone know the legalities involved here and what kind of compensation I should look for?




View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
BDFL - Memuneh
60994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11834

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843957 25-Jun-2013 13:03
Send private message

IANAL, you retain the copyright over the original art form and if there's no license involved (a CC license for example) then no one should reproduce it.

Get a lawyer to give you proper information in your jurisdiction.





xpd

Chief Trash Bandit
8845 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1300

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843959 25-Jun-2013 13:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

Is it an actual physical painting ? Looks to me more than someone has just run your image through Photoshop/Picasa filters.....




XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

For Free Games, Geekiness and Reviews, visit :

 

Home Of The Overrated Raccoons

 

Battlenet : XPD#11535    Origin/Steam/Epic/Uplay : xpdnz


BDFL - Memuneh
60994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11834

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843960 25-Jun-2013 13:05
Send private message

Regardless, it still not legal to reproduce it... And if it's used for anything then it would be even a bigger case.

To the OP, where did you find the reproduction?







Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843962 25-Jun-2013 13:07
One person supports this post
Send private message


Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843964 25-Jun-2013 13:10
Send private message

I infrequently Google photographs I have taken. Google Image Search has become scaringly powerfull.

You can search with an image from here: http://www.google.co.nz/imghp - The search can be an image you upload yourself, or an IMG-url or just an image search term.




660 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36
Inactive user


  Reply # 843967 25-Jun-2013 13:12
Send private message

jarledb: I am not 100% sure, but this: http://www.itcompas.be/vantongelmartine/nieuw.htm - this: http://www.itcompas.be/vantongelmartine/ and this: http://www.uitinwestvlaanderen.be/20569/kunst-in-het-ondernemerscentrum-martine-van-tongel makes me think its an actual artwork of sorts.



It looks like a painter has drawn it himself so it his personal work...

BDFL - Memuneh
60994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11834

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843969 25-Jun-2013 13:14
Send private message

It looks like it's being made for commercial use. Get a laywer and ask for the work to be returned, destroyed or paid for.






Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843970 25-Jun-2013 13:15
Send private message

I know what I would do if this was used for something that was screamingly commercial. Any such use would incure a fee of double the going rate for use of such a photograph. Typically in the NZD 2000 range. (But depends on use. If it was used in a magazine ad with high circulation the price would have been much higher).

In this case I am uncertain of how commercial the use is, and if the artwork has actually been sold (or could be sold) and what that means for compensation.

Probably lawyer food, but I have sent the artist an email and will see how she responds before I consider further action.




BDFL - Memuneh
60994 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11834

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843971 25-Jun-2013 13:15
One person supports this post
Send private message

sep11guy: It looks like a painter has drawn it himself so it his personal work...


The painter used his original art (the photo) in a derivative work (the painting). Still copyright breach as it is a copy.





14200 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1823


  Reply # 843972 25-Jun-2013 13:16
Send private message

Looks like it is a photoshop filter. Dust and scratches filter possibly. Involving a lawyer maybe expensive. Maybe first try the CAB.  When I had someone copy my work, I just contacted them, and they removed it. But if you are looking for damages, the lawyer route would be the way to go, and they may give you some template to use in the future.



Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843975 25-Jun-2013 13:17
Send private message

sep11guy, actually. A photograph is a copyright protected work of art. If you paint a version of it you are making a derivative work.

Just as a piece of music doesn't loose its copyright if you record it yourself, so does the photograph not loose its copyright even if you make a painting of it.

More info: http://painting.about.com/cs/artistscopyright/f/copyrightfaq5.htm






Webhead
2045 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 651

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 843978 25-Jun-2013 13:21
Send private message

mattwnz: Looks like it is a photoshop filter. Dust and scratches filter possibly. Involving a lawyer maybe expensive. Maybe first try the CAB.  When I had someone copy my work, I just contacted them, and they removed it. 


Looks like it has been produced and displayed in art exhibitions.

If I was to want it gone, would have to ask them to burn all prints and recall any sold?




660 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36
Inactive user


  Reply # 843980 25-Jun-2013 13:22
Send private message

jarledb: sep11guy, actually. A photograph is a copyright protected work of art. If you paint a version of it you are making a derivative work.

Just as a piece of music doesn't loose its copyright if you record it yourself, so does the photograph not loose its copyright even if you make a painting of it.

More info: http://painting.about.com/cs/artistscopyright/f/copyrightfaq5.htm



Totally Agree !!

660 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 36
Inactive user


  Reply # 843981 25-Jun-2013 13:22
Send private message

freitasm:
sep11guy: It looks like a painter has drawn it himself so it his personal work...


The painter used his original art (the photo) in a derivative work (the painting). Still copyright breach as it is a copy.




Yes, thanks, point noted. Just read a link from the OP.,

14200 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1823


  Reply # 843982 25-Jun-2013 13:23
Send private message

jarledb:
mattwnz: Looks like it is a photoshop filter. Dust and scratches filter possibly. Involving a lawyer maybe expensive. Maybe first try the CAB.  When I had someone copy my work, I just contacted them, and they removed it. 


Looks like it has been produced and displayed in art exhibitions.

If I was to want it gone, would have to ask them to burn all prints and recall any sold?


I that case, ask a lawyer. There was a case similar on fair go a few years ago, where a company photographed an artwork, and sold it on T-shirts.

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Targus set sights on enterprise and consumer growth in New Zealand
Posted 13-Aug-2018 13:47


Huawei to distribute nova 3i in New Zealand
Posted 9-Aug-2018 16:23


Home robot Vector to be available in New Zealand stores
Posted 9-Aug-2018 14:47


Panasonic announces new 2018 OLED TV line up
Posted 7-Aug-2018 16:38


Kordia completes first live 4K TV broadcast
Posted 1-Aug-2018 13:00


Schools get safer and smarter internet with Managed Network Upgrade
Posted 30-Jul-2018 20:01


DNC wants a safer .nz in the coming year
Posted 26-Jul-2018 16:08


Auldhouse becomes an AWS Authorised Training Delivery Partner in New Zealand
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:55


Rakuten Kobo launches Kobo Clara HD entry level reader
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:44


Kiwi team reaches semi-finals at the Microsoft Imagine Cup
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:38


KidsCan App to Help Kiwi Children in Need
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:32


FUJIFILM announces new high-performance lenses
Posted 24-Jul-2018 14:57


New FUJIFILM XF10 introduces square mode for Instagram sharing
Posted 24-Jul-2018 14:44


OPPO brings advanced technology to the smartphone market with new device
Posted 24-Jul-2018 09:20


Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.