Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
60 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 1071884 21-Jun-2014 21:39
Send private message

insane: I've owned several Sigma lenses and for me my Canon L lenses were always sharper, and as stated above created far smoother bokeh.

There is something to be said about Canon body's though, I found different lenses performed differently depending which body I used them on. My 70-200 f2.8L for example was sharp on a cheap 400D, not so sharp on a 40D, and then razor sharp on a 5Dmk2. Then my Canon 200mm F2.8 Prime was just awesome on any body - wish I hadn't sold it.

Just got back from a month in Europe and would have to take a guess and say 75% of the DSLRs I saw were Nikon's which surprised me a lot. Of the Canon's I did see they were typically 1D's or 5D's.


you can try process them all with raw with the same sharpness settings

also it could be that the 70-200 was like -5 in microfocus adjustment and the 400d/5d2 just so happen to be +4 inside the body while it's another -3 in the 40d, which end up with -8 and miss the focus quite badly



also if you have the budget and weight isn't an issue, always go prime due to the better f stop, sharpness and most importantly contrast and colour

195 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  Reply # 1071886 21-Jun-2014 21:42
Send private message

Excellent write up this here: http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/12/this-lens-is-soft-and-other-myths

 
 
 
 


2242 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 353

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1071932 22-Jun-2014 00:00
Send private message

danza:
insane: I've owned several Sigma lenses and for me my Canon L lenses were always sharper, and as stated above created far smoother bokeh.

There is something to be said about Canon body's though, I found different lenses performed differently depending which body I used them on. My 70-200 f2.8L for example was sharp on a cheap 400D, not so sharp on a 40D, and then razor sharp on a 5Dmk2. Then my Canon 200mm F2.8 Prime was just awesome on any body - wish I hadn't sold it.

Just got back from a month in Europe and would have to take a guess and say 75% of the DSLRs I saw were Nikon's which surprised me a lot. Of the Canon's I did see they were typically 1D's or 5D's.


you can try process them all with raw with the same sharpness settings

also it could be that the 70-200 was like -5 in microfocus adjustment and the 400d/5d2 just so happen to be +4 inside the body while it's another -3 in the 40d, which end up with -8 and miss the focus quite badly



also if you have the budget and weight isn't an issue, always go prime due to the better f stop, sharpness and most importantly contrast and colour


That certainly sounds plausible, but honestly I've pretty must retired my camera kit. Just wasn't using it enough. Still have my 40d body and a 50mm f1.4 for TradeMe photos, but that's it now. My little Canon G12 and Galaxy S4 does the bulk of my shooting now. Sad I know.



247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 1082467 7-Jul-2014 14:37
Send private message

I'd say it changes from lens to lens, Sigma makes some great lenses and some not so great ones.





60 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 21


  Reply # 1084488 8-Jul-2014 23:11
Send private message

not just different brands, some copy of the same lens are sharper than others
which is why some review sites like the-digital-picture literally has multiple copy of the same lens in their review IQ database, and some people orders like 3 of the same lens to test all of them and returns everything except the sharpest one 

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 1086729 10-Jul-2014 21:04
Send private message

Could point out Sigma's new 50mm f1.4 stomps all over the competition.







17518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2122

Trusted

  Reply # 1086735 10-Jul-2014 21:10
Send private message

So I heard!

Getting ever so close to ordering a sigma 35 prime over a Canon ... But haven't pulled the trigger

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 1086746 10-Jul-2014 21:13
Send private message

joker97: So I heard!

Getting ever so close to ordering a sigma 35 prime over a Canon ... But haven't pulled the trigger


Waiting for a new 85mm myself, also saving for the 120-300mm 2.8 Sport (about 2/3 of the way there).







17518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2122

Trusted

  Reply # 1086748 10-Jul-2014 21:13
Send private message

RileyB: Could point out Sigma's new 50mm f1.4 stomps all over the competition.


It's not that hard to own the 50mm prime sharpness charts hence the 50 art's success here, every lens on the market with autofocus has issues. But sharpness on its own isn't the entire story.



17518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2122

Trusted

  Reply # 1086749 10-Jul-2014 21:14
Send private message

RileyB:
joker97: So I heard!

Getting ever so close to ordering a sigma 35 prime over a Canon ... But haven't pulled the trigger


Waiting for a new 85mm myself, also saving for the 120-300mm 2.8 Sport (about 2/3 of the way there).


Wow never heard of this lens ... might be what I need ... as long as it doesn't look and feel like a bazooka



17518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2122

Trusted

  Reply # 1086750 10-Jul-2014 21:16
Send private message

RileyB:
joker97: So I heard!

Getting ever so close to ordering a sigma 35 prime over a Canon ... But haven't pulled the trigger


Waiting for a new 85mm myself, also saving for the 120-300mm 2.8 Sport (about 2/3 of the way there).


Don't wait. The Canon 1.8 is the best out there. Fastest focus, track sharp wide open, buttery bokeh, light, can be had for loose change. No brainer!

247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39




17518 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2122

Trusted

  Reply # 1086763 10-Jul-2014 21:37
Send private message

RileyB: It is fairly big, and about $4500 in NZ: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-120-300mm-f-2.8-DG-OS-HSM-Lens.aspx



Edit: it's also said to work very well with extenders



thanks, i sooo saw that coming. *sigh* out of my reach. back to tamron 150-600 vs 70-300L *sigh

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23


New Fujifilm macro lens lands in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:16


Cyber security not being taken seriously enough
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:13


Sony commences Android 8.0 Oreo rollout in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:08



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.