![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
mattRSK: I've read on other forums that drop tables worked.
networkn: I think you guys are treading very close to the line on a prior warning that exploits were not to be discussed in this forum for any reason in any way. Can I recommend you remove your posts?
Kyanar:networkn: I think you guys are treading very close to the line on a prior warning that exploits were not to be discussed in this forum for any reason in any way. Can I recommend you remove your posts?
The warning wasn't not to discuss exploits, it was a warning not to give instructions. Advocating suppressing knowledge of an exploit existing is dangerously close to advocating security through obscurity, which everyone knows is bad.
PottsyNZ: This isn't lulzsec, we're just observing the crappage, shaking our heads in disbelief
ajobbins:PottsyNZ: How much did Telecom dump on Ferit?
Possibly upwards of $70m
freitasm: Lots of discussions on Twitter yesterday. They apparently use "40 servers" to run the site. Whoever managed to register yesterday also found out that session information was not consistent across those servers.
My joke this morning was something along the lines of "I am still surprised Wheedle needed 40 servers to serve 503 and 404 responses."
The site was up and down a few times. I managed to register to secure my user name, to find out that going through pages would show me logged in as "freitasm", not logged in at all, or logged in with someone else's name and information being shown.
Another article says they have outsourced development to an Indian-based company. This is a shame, with so many talented developers in New Zealand that could probably do a much better job in development, deployment and management. They probably cut costs by not doing proper unit/system/integration/regresion/deployment testing.
Let's see what happens on 1st October.
Chaitanya: Outsourcing to India doesn't necessarily mean they cut costs and hence they get inferior output. That depends on lot of other factors like which agency they chose, what are the terms of contract and various other factors for there will be always good and bad people and businesses in every country in this world. I object the generalization attributed here to certain country.
Chaitanya:freitasm: Lots of discussions on Twitter yesterday. They apparently use "40 servers" to run the site. Whoever managed to register yesterday also found out that session information was not consistent across those servers.
My joke this morning was something along the lines of "I am still surprised Wheedle needed 40 servers to serve 503 and 404 responses."
The site was up and down a few times. I managed to register to secure my user name, to find out that going through pages would show me logged in as "freitasm", not logged in at all, or logged in with someone else's name and information being shown.
Another article says they have outsourced development to an Indian-based company. This is a shame, with so many talented developers in New Zealand that could probably do a much better job in development, deployment and management. They probably cut costs by not doing proper unit/system/integration/regresion/deployment testing.
Let's see what happens on 1st October.
Outsourcing to India doesn't necessarily mean they cut costs and hence they get inferior output. That depends on lot of other factors like which agency they chose, what are the terms of contract and various other factors for there will be always good and bad people and businesses in every country in this world. I object the generalization attributed here to certain country.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Mighty Ape | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Twitter: ajobbins
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |