Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79
8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1823566 17-Jul-2017 07:12
Send private message quote this post

kingjj:

 

tdgeek:

This has been a days issue not an every second week for a week one. If you use Flick you get low rates all through the year, and this day's issue may happen a couple of times. Beats me how some love the low rates but can't endure the opposite for a very brief period

 

Why should we endure these highs though? It's a competitive open market which Flick and EK well know. Most people jump from one Internet deal to another regularly, or one bank to another, one cell provider to another etc. why not Power? I have no shame in saying that I am out to save my family the most I can, if that means jumping ship due to a "very brief period" of high rates (try weeks of it now) than so be it. I've said it before and I'll say it again, I had no loyalty to Flick like I have no loyalty to Electric Kiwi now. If either went under I wouldn't shed a tear I'd just look for the next best deal and enjoy that while I could.

 

 

Thats ok. If everybody does that, Flick ends. So you go back to fixed rate, and pay the average of the years prices to buffer this high period, plus a premium. Lose Lose


1632 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 494

Subscriber

  Reply # 1824113 18-Jul-2017 00:07
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Wiggum:

 

tdgeek:

This has been a days issue not an every second week for a week one. If you use Flick you get low rates all through the year, and this day's issue may happen a couple of times. Beats me how some love the low rates but can't endure the opposite for a very brief period

 

I agree with you, but the point I am trying to make is that you need to be home to be able to manage it. If switching appliances off is out of your control, then flick is not right for you.

 

Granted it was brief period (2 days in a row), but Winter is far from over and there is more to come. I guess its a risk that some are prepared to take, and others not. Personally I would just prefer a flat rate, even if its a bit more.

 

I just don't see the point of being at work, receiving notification of high prices etc when there is little I can actually do.

 

Flick is a great idea, they can make far better by perhaps giving users the flexibility of switching between a fixed rate/spot prices whenever required.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is a great idea, it still is, nothing has changed. but I cannot believe your last phrase. You want the lowest price but not the risk that goes with that. Thats crazy and thats not the model they run and you subscribed to. Analogy is you don't want to pay insurance premiums. But if you need to claim, you will for that day.

 

You can:

 

Go to a fixed rate company, the highs and lows are managed for you

 

Pay the Flick bill and a bit more each payment, build up a buffer. Many do that themselves, many companies have an option to assess the annual average and you pay that. 

 

 

Actually there is a 3rd way - Self hedge. Which I do myself. How? - I have gas cooking, including oven + gas heating. Hot water is a 300L cylinder with solar. I also have a homemade waste oil boiler, that does hot water, radiator central heating, and spa heating. Also have 200AH of 12V battery storage, originally intended to keep my router, Wifi, fibre ONT ect powered up during powercuts. But it has also helped in the price spikes, by putting a timer on the battery charger. I can also run an inverter from it if prices get really crazy.

 

Im planning to upgrade the battery and inverter system as well as add solar PV to it. As since I have saved well over $1000 since joining Flick, I can spend a reasonable amount on "self hedging" measures.

 

For lots of other people, just having gas cooking and either a woodburner fire or even an unflued LPG heater will give plenty of hedging. And things that you do for price hedging also are very useful for disaster preparedness. So there are non financial benefits as well that you get from self hedging.






 
 
 
 


459 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 92


  Reply # 1824114 18-Jul-2017 00:49
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

The rate of posts in this thread seem to be correlated with the price of power, although maybe a quadratic across the mean price. ;)

 

The biggest limitation for Flick users is the small # of people on a floating price. If you had even just 10% of the country floating, they would have had the incentive to conserve at least something during the peaks, and probably would have had a reasonable impact on the peak prices. My understanding is that the price curve gets rather steep towards the 'top' so even a small reduction in demand would decrease prices substantially. Which is the real benefit of the price signalling.

 

The game changer of course would be something like a price forecast aware heat pump that preheats a little extra before the price spike and lets the house 'go low' a couple of degrees during the peak.  Nest & Ecobee are working with utilities here in the US to provide that. Floating also provides the price incentive for Aredwood's hedging/solar + batteries (my biggest gripe about net-metering). If that can be automated & packaged smartly...

 

Other thought: It's a pity Flick customer's can't fix a proportion of their usage. That is, offer something like a 50/50 fixed/float rate, so half your usage in any given price period is hedged. You could also do something like the free hour of power around fixing/floating - they must have the consumption data now to make that work. Though it would probably have to come at the cost of flick taking a bigger fee per KwH.


8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1824130 18-Jul-2017 07:33
Send private message quote this post

k1wi:

 

The rate of posts in this thread seem to be correlated with the price of power, although maybe a quadratic across the mean price. ;)

 

The biggest limitation for Flick users is the small # of people on a floating price. If you had even just 10% of the country floating, they would have had the incentive to conserve at least something during the peaks, and probably would have had a reasonable impact on the peak prices. My understanding is that the price curve gets rather steep towards the 'top' so even a small reduction in demand would decrease prices substantially. Which is the real benefit of the price signalling.

 

The game changer of course would be something like a price forecast aware heat pump that preheats a little extra before the price spike and lets the house 'go low' a couple of degrees during the peak.  Nest & Ecobee are working with utilities here in the US to provide that. Floating also provides the price incentive for Aredwood's hedging/solar + batteries (my biggest gripe about net-metering). If that can be automated & packaged smartly...

 

Other thought: It's a pity Flick customer's can't fix a proportion of their usage. That is, offer something like a 50/50 fixed/float rate, so half your usage in any given price period is hedged. You could also do something like the free hour of power around fixing/floating - they must have the consumption data now to make that work. Though it would probably have to come at the cost of flick taking a bigger fee per KwH.

 

 

There is a level of incentive. People want to reduce the high winter power bills. I cant see everyone being on a spot price service and dealing with the recent event.

 

If Flick gave a part fixed rate, then off course you will pay a "normal" rate, and if that was 50/50, you halve the annual benefits of ;low spot prices as compared to fixed rates. But you cant expect Flick to charge you a fixed rate while you are chewing through spike spot prices.

 

Historically the recent issue is no big deal,. its been worse. Its normal. Its up to the subscriber to manage it. Conserve where you can, build up a buffer credit on your bill to cater for winter, and self hedging as @aredwood posted   But you cannot expect to get low low spot rates all year then Flick pick up the tab when it spikes.


459 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 92


  Reply # 1824139 18-Jul-2017 07:54
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

k1wi:

 

The rate of posts in this thread seem to be correlated with the price of power, although maybe a quadratic across the mean price. ;)

 

The biggest limitation for Flick users is the small # of people on a floating price. If you had even just 10% of the country floating, they would have had the incentive to conserve at least something during the peaks, and probably would have had a reasonable impact on the peak prices. My understanding is that the price curve gets rather steep towards the 'top' so even a small reduction in demand would decrease prices substantially. Which is the real benefit of the price signalling.

 

The game changer of course would be something like a price forecast aware heat pump that preheats a little extra before the price spike and lets the house 'go low' a couple of degrees during the peak.  Nest & Ecobee are working with utilities here in the US to provide that. Floating also provides the price incentive for Aredwood's hedging/solar + batteries (my biggest gripe about net-metering). If that can be automated & packaged smartly...

 

Other thought: It's a pity Flick customer's can't fix a proportion of their usage. That is, offer something like a 50/50 fixed/float rate, so half your usage in any given price period is hedged. You could also do something like the free hour of power around fixing/floating - they must have the consumption data now to make that work. Though it would probably have to come at the cost of flick taking a bigger fee per KwH.

 

 

There is a level of incentive. People want to reduce the high winter power bills. I cant see everyone being on a spot price service and dealing with the recent event.

 

If Flick gave a part fixed rate, then off course you will pay a "normal" rate, and if that was 50/50, you halve the annual benefits of ;low spot prices as compared to fixed rates. But you cant expect Flick to charge you a fixed rate while you are chewing through spike spot prices.

 

Historically the recent issue is no big deal,. its been worse. Its normal. Its up to the subscriber to manage it. Conserve where you can, build up a buffer credit on your bill to cater for winter, and self hedging as @aredwood posted   But you cannot expect to get low low spot rates all year then Flick pick up the tab when it spikes.

 

 

Under fixed rate service the incentive is to use less electricity generally, but it creates a very small incentive to the individual to reduce usage when prices are high (as this reduction is collectively spread across the entire customer base).

 

The 50/50 split is a hedge against really high prices - yes it costs you some during low prices and saves you some during high prices, but it reduces the risk (or allows you to choose the level of variation you're comfortable with). It would probably need to be fixed for a set period of time to prevent gaming of the seasons, say 1 year intervals or 1 change per 12 month period with the company, but my point is it doesn't have to be all fixed or all float.  Would a family household be comfortable with doing a partial float? Maybe.

 

I envisage the hour of fixed prices could be say during an hour of the day when you know you usually have some power use that is pretty essential. Given their customer data Flick would be able to price the fixed fee according to their costs.




632 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 9


  Reply # 1824141 18-Jul-2017 08:04
Send private message quote this post

k1wi:

 

 

 

The game changer of course would be something like a price forecast aware heat pump that preheats a little extra before the price spike and lets the house 'go low' a couple of degrees during the peak.  Nest & Ecobee are working with utilities here in the US to provide that. Floating also provides the price incentive for Aredwood's hedging/solar + batteries (my biggest gripe about net-metering). If that can be automated & packaged smartly...

 

 

You can do that now if you wish.

 

There are a few scripts around that can read the predicted price, and they can be used to control a Broadlink controller.  See https://www.geekzone.co.nz/sbiddle/8949


8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1824144 18-Jul-2017 08:07
Send private message quote this post

k1wi:

 

 

 

Under fixed rate service the incentive is to use less electricity generally, but it creates a very small incentive to the individual to reduce usage when prices are high (as this reduction is collectively spread across the entire customer base).

 

The 50/50 split is a hedge against really high prices - yes it costs you some during low prices and saves you some during high prices, but it reduces the risk (or allows you to choose the level of variation you're comfortable with). It would probably need to be fixed for a set period of time to prevent gaming of the seasons, say 1 year intervals or 1 change per 12 month period with the company, but my point is it doesn't have to be all fixed or all float.  Would a family household be comfortable with doing a partial float? Maybe.

 

I envisage the hour of fixed prices could be say during an hour of the day when you know you usually have some power use that is pretty essential. Given their customer data Flick would be able to price the fixed fee according to their costs.

 

 

I get that, and a sound idea, BUT the issue is spot prices. With other providers, you pay a fixed rate, they pay a spot rate. So they wear these high spot price spikes. They may hedge, but they pay to hedge. The fixed rate is based to even out the consumers bill, and it also covers the provider for the infrequent but high spikes. If you fixed 50/50 for a year, then your effectively saying that spot exposure isnt worth it, so lets halve that risk. So why use Flick spot at all? If it was worth it to go 50/50 for the spot price 50%, its worth it to go all spot. IMHO its up to the consumer to hedge themselves so that infrequent high spot prices dont bite. Pay an extra $x per month and build up a credit, to offset the spike. Equip yourself with as much non electricity appliances as is feasible

 

End of the day is Flick worth it 365 days a year?


47 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1824779 18-Jul-2017 21:10
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

If you fixed 50/50 for a year, then your effectively saying that spot exposure isnt worth it, so lets halve that risk. So why use Flick spot at all? If it was worth it to go 50/50 for the spot price 50%, its worth it to go all spot.

 

 

Similar to how many homeowners split their mortgage, part fixed 5 years, part fixed 2 years, part floating.  Not everyone is comfortable with 100% risk, but that doesn't mean they only want 0% risk.

 

Also sometimes the combination is greater than the parts.  With split mortgages I get the ability to make no penalty over payments, which means i can fix the fixed portion over 30 year terms, giving me less risk of not making payments when i am out of work, but when i am working I can repay as if it's a 5 year term to minimise interest. And low risk of rate changes as most of it is fixed. For a small amount of risk that the rates on the floating portion may rise (or fall).

 

On a electricity hedging market i'd expect fixing 50% of your bill over summer would cost next to nothing so you still get the low flick rates.  Hedging for delivery over winter would cost a lot more, but you reduce the pain in dry years... It depends how much that comfort is worth to the individual.

 

 

 

 

 

 


8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1824795 18-Jul-2017 21:39
Send private message quote this post

dantheperson:

 

tdgeek:

 

If you fixed 50/50 for a year, then your effectively saying that spot exposure isnt worth it, so lets halve that risk. So why use Flick spot at all? If it was worth it to go 50/50 for the spot price 50%, its worth it to go all spot.

 

 

Similar to how many homeowners split their mortgage, part fixed 5 years, part fixed 2 years, part floating.  Not everyone is comfortable with 100% risk, but that doesn't mean they only want 0% risk.

 

Also sometimes the combination is greater than the parts.  With split mortgages I get the ability to make no penalty over payments, which means i can fix the fixed portion over 30 year terms, giving me less risk of not making payments when i am out of work, but when i am working I can repay as if it's a 5 year term to minimise interest. And low risk of rate changes as most of it is fixed. For a small amount of risk that the rates on the floating portion may rise (or fall).

 

On a electricity hedging market i'd expect fixing 50% of your bill over summer would cost next to nothing so you still get the low flick rates.  Hedging for delivery over winter would cost a lot more, but you reduce the pain in dry years... It depends how much that comfort is worth to the individual. 

 

 

No, no no :-)

 

A 30 year mortgage is a world apart from a few day spot price spike. If mortgage rates jumped to 65% for a few weeks every year, then maybe

 

Your last paragraph sums it up. Dry years don't exist. Its days per year when the lakes and weather combine. In your words, you would wear the high spike as the rest of the year makes up for it. Thats the answer. And if you had the ability to hedge for the spike times, the extra will be huge, not just a lot more. Power providers build that in to their rates over a year. Much like seasonal manufactures that run at a loss on the off season. 

 

Comfort. Pay more each payment. That credit tides you over the high months. Work out the average over a year, /12. Sorted.  Have other options available to reduce electricity usage. Gas, solar. 


1632 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 494

Subscriber

  Reply # 1824820 18-Jul-2017 22:10
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

dantheperson:

 

tdgeek:

 

If you fixed 50/50 for a year, then your effectively saying that spot exposure isnt worth it, so lets halve that risk. So why use Flick spot at all? If it was worth it to go 50/50 for the spot price 50%, its worth it to go all spot.

 

 

Similar to how many homeowners split their mortgage, part fixed 5 years, part fixed 2 years, part floating.  Not everyone is comfortable with 100% risk, but that doesn't mean they only want 0% risk.

 

Also sometimes the combination is greater than the parts.  With split mortgages I get the ability to make no penalty over payments, which means i can fix the fixed portion over 30 year terms, giving me less risk of not making payments when i am out of work, but when i am working I can repay as if it's a 5 year term to minimise interest. And low risk of rate changes as most of it is fixed. For a small amount of risk that the rates on the floating portion may rise (or fall).

 

On a electricity hedging market i'd expect fixing 50% of your bill over summer would cost next to nothing so you still get the low flick rates.  Hedging for delivery over winter would cost a lot more, but you reduce the pain in dry years... It depends how much that comfort is worth to the individual.

 

  

 

 

Electricity hedging is bought and sold in Megawatts over an agreed time period. So if Flick were to onsell Hedging to their end customers, They would probably do so in Kilowatts / units per hour or 1/2 hour. How that would work for billing - Say I buy 2KW per hour of hedging at 25c per unit. If my usage over that 1 hour period is say 3KW/Hr, I would pay 25c per unit for 2KW/Hr and the going spot price for the remaining 1KW/Hr of usage. Typically the hedging agreement acts as a price cap on what you would pay for the amount you have hedged for. So if the unit price was actually less than 25c, then that is what you pay.

 

 

 

So in deciding how much hedging to buy, you would first workout how much of your usage you could self hedge for. And then buy enough hedging to cover your loads that you cannot defer or time shift. Or otherwise for your base load. The problem is that the average all electric household has a very spiky demand pattern. So it would be very difficult to figure out how much hedging to buy. Unless Flick or someone else repackages hedging to either KW/Hr per bill, KW/Hr per bill during peak times ect. Instead of simply splitting commercial hedge contracts between lots of customers.

 

Here is my usage during 1 of the really bad spikes

 

Click to see full size

 

Since my usage was so low during the most expensive time, It didn't add that much extra overall to my bill. If I did want to buy hedging, I would probably only want 0.5KW/Hr per hour of hedging. But self hedging is working really well for me. At the time my LPG heater would have probably been on, Using LPG at 16.4c per KW/hr. For lots of people, Self Hedging will probably be the cheapest way of managing price spikes. Combined with time shifting of course.






47 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 4


  Reply # 1824825 18-Jul-2017 22:15
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

 

 

No, no no :-)

 

A 30 year mortgage is a world apart from a few day spot price spike. If mortgage rates jumped to 65% for a few weeks every year, then maybe

 

And if you had the ability to hedge for the spike times, the extra will be huge,

 

 

I live in Auckland, so my mortgage rate going up 0.5% concerns me far far more than my powerbill tripling for a few weeks.

 

You purchase the hedge in advance, you don't know if / when prices will spike, it's like insurance you can't purchase after the event.  Purchase it well before there are any indicators of a dry year and it wont be huge.


8425 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1203

Trusted

  Reply # 1824831 18-Jul-2017 22:25
Send private message quote this post

dantheperson:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

No, no no :-)

 

A 30 year mortgage is a world apart from a few day spot price spike. If mortgage rates jumped to 65% for a few weeks every year, then maybe

 

And if you had the ability to hedge for the spike times, the extra will be huge,

 

 

I live in Auckland, so my mortgage rate going up 0.5% concerns me far far more than my powerbill tripling for a few weeks.

 

You purchase the hedge in advance, you don't know if / when prices will spike, it's like insurance you can't purchase after the event.  Purchase it well before there are any indicators of a dry year and it wont be huge.

 

 

There is no dry year. The recent spike was low lakes and polar blast. Others will occur. Not huge? The spot price increase was very large. Build that and any others onto a year, add a premium for risk, thats the extra. Either way you pay the spike, it all depends if you pay it now, or every bill, evened out


54 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 1824862 19-Jul-2017 00:04
Send private message quote this post

At the time my LPG heater would have probably been on, Using LPG at 16.4c per KW/hr.



How did you come the price of 16.4c? I'm assuming that's not a heat-pump equivalent kWh? I.e. they say a heat pump uses about 1/3 the energy to move heat rather than create it, so would that mean the LPG price equivalent would be 3*16.4=49.2c/kWh?

459 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 92


  Reply # 1824866 19-Jul-2017 01:37
Send private message quote this post

My inspiration for suggesting the ability to fix/float a proportion of the contract came from michaelmurfy's situation (and anyone where they're not completely confident they can manage their usage, like a large household.)  If his sister comes in and turns on everything including the AN/SPY-1 radar during a price spike, then at least he'll only be half as exposed to the spike as if he was fully floated.

 

If you did a 50/50 split (easy math) half the kWh's (of each price period) would be at the fixed price, and the other half of the kWH's (of each price period) would be at the floating rate.

 

If you restrict it to one change a year then you limit the amount of 'gaming' (i.e. fixing more just in case of an expensive winter). Alternatively you could vary the fixed rate per season (as is done here in the US) and allow customers to alter their risk profile once per season. Probably depends on how Flick can purchase power from the market.  The seasonal fixed rate might allow households to dip their toes in with a small float (say 10%), and then more quickly increase it as they became more comfortable.

 

It might even help them with retention during periods as seen recently, when customers hopped over to EK.


54 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  Reply # 1824931 19-Jul-2017 07:17
Send private message quote this post

k1wi:

My inspiration for suggesting the ability to fix/float a proportion of the contract came from michaelmurfy's situation (and anyone where they're not completely confident they can manage their usage, like a large household.)  If his sister comes in and turns on everything including the AN/SPY-1 radar during a price spike, then at least he'll only be half as exposed to the spike as if he was fully floated.


If you did a 50/50 split (easy math) half the kWh's (of each price period) would be at the fixed price, and the other half of the kWH's (of each price period) would be at the floating rate.


If you restrict it to one change a year then you limit the amount of 'gaming' (i.e. fixing more just in case of an expensive winter). Alternatively you could vary the fixed rate per season (as is done here in the US) and allow customers to alter their risk profile once per season. Probably depends on how Flick can purchase power from the market.  The seasonal fixed rate might allow households to dip their toes in with a small float (say 10%), and then more quickly increase it as they became more comfortable.


It might even help them with retention during periods as seen recently, when customers hopped over to EK.



To do some kind of fixed/float swap might not be as good as you imagine... Either the swap would be agreed a short time before fixed period, in which case the fixed rate would need to be determined by the average floating rate over that period.

So to hedge "weekday work hours" a week in advance would jhave a fixed rate of the average the forecast weekday work hour spot prices. This is not likely to give you any real benefit at all.

Likewise for long term "weekday work hour" fixing - you're just going to get a fixed rate that is approx the average long-term spot price over those hour, which would likely be a lot higher than a normal "full-time" fixed rate.

Another option (as I mentioned earlier in this thread) might be a "cap" on your spot price, but this would involve paying an up-front premium similar to insurance.

1 | ... | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Nothing nebulous about Microsoft’s cloud-transition
Posted 21-Jul-2017 15:34


We’re spending more on tech, but not as much as Australians
Posted 21-Jul-2017 11:43


Endace announces EndaceFabric for network-wide packet recording
Posted 20-Jul-2017 20:49


Acorn 6: MacOS image editing for the rest of us
Posted 20-Jul-2017 17:04


HTC faces backlash over keyboard pop-up ads
Posted 19-Jul-2017 15:53


BNZ adds Visa credit cards to Android Pay wallet
Posted 18-Jul-2017 19:44


Still living in a Notification hell – Om Malik
Posted 18-Jul-2017 13:00


Duet Display uses iPad to extend Mac, PC
Posted 18-Jul-2017 10:58


PC sales could be worse
Posted 17-Jul-2017 07:34


Crypto-currencies, tulips, market bubbles
Posted 17-Jul-2017 06:38


NZ Tech Podcast: Big batteries, solar cars, cold war, IoT
Posted 16-Jul-2017 16:53


Vodafone Australia mulls Wisp alliance, NZ implications
Posted 13-Jul-2017 16:49


Rural health professionals see fibre pay-off
Posted 13-Jul-2017 11:52


Vodafone announces expansion of $5 Daily Roaming
Posted 13-Jul-2017 10:20


Intel unveils powerful Intel Xeon Scalable processors
Posted 12-Jul-2017 20:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.