Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Mad Scientist
18911 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2456

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 223732 15-Oct-2017 09:44
Send private message

Spoke to an architect (from another country) who said lifespan of such cladding is about 15 years.

 

Would anyone buy these sort of houses?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
257 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 11

Subscriber

  Reply # 1883713 15-Oct-2017 09:56
Send private message

Mine was built 13 years ago cladding is fine just wish we had up graded the insulation

 

we live in Dunedin and does get some salt from sea

 


12843 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6067

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1883722 15-Oct-2017 10:14
One person supports this post
Send private message

I like really the look. A friend has one and their only complaint is it can be a bit noisy in heavy rain or hail. Their home is about 12 years old and they have had no problems with it.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


256 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 34

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1883725 15-Oct-2017 10:42
Send private message

I lived in a workers cottage that had this. It is over 100 years old. You can still see it at 205 Aro Street, Wellington. No problems.


3055 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1538


  Reply # 1883726 15-Oct-2017 10:58
2 people support this post
Send private message

Sounds like the architect has no clue about NZ cladding. Installed properly and looked after it should last 50+ years. Just look at the corrugated roofs and how long they last.




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



gzt

10113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1539


  Reply # 1883728 15-Oct-2017 11:20
Send private message

Batman:

Spoke to an architect (from another country) who said lifespan of such cladding is about 15 years.


In NZ this material has been in use for a long time. I'm aware of unpainted galvanised roofing just coming up to end of life after 50 years, and there are older examples here and there.

217 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1883729 15-Oct-2017 11:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

The guy has no idea about the lifespan of NZ roofs, which is 30 years at least. I would like it as a no fuss way of cladding.


1019 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1883731 15-Oct-2017 11:28
Send private message

Perhaps there's confusion about required durability under the Building Code B2 and feasible life. Non-structural cladding is only required to have a durability of >15 years.


gzt

10113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1539


  Reply # 1883732 15-Oct-2017 11:29
Send private message

sleepy: Mine was built 13 years ago cladding is fine just wish we had up graded the insulation

Dunedin I'm guessing cold issues not hot issues : ). The cladding is thermally conductive compared to wood, perhaps a higher grade of insulation should be specified to compensate.

I was considering a similar project some time ago and considered a nitrile rubber as a thermal break between the timber stud and the iron. If that mod complies with the building code I'm not sure

2516 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 317


  Reply # 1883734 15-Oct-2017 11:37
Send private message

You have to keep a track of how the material has changed over time. Apparently the old corrugated iron had twice as much Zinc on the weather side as the modern equivalent.

2833 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 478


  Reply # 1883736 15-Oct-2017 11:43
Send private message

Sixty years ago my Dad built the family home and clad it with Metalcraft weather board, which was basically the same galvanised iron sheeting material as used for corrugated iron roofing but pressed to a shape that looked like traditional weather boards.

 

About 2 years ago he decided to replace the cladding and at the same time installed insulation in the walls. The cladding was still in good condition when it was removed.

 

I'd say there's every chance you'd get 80 to 100 years out of corrugated iron presuming it was installed correctly.





Sony Xperia X running Sailfish
Jolla C
Nokia N1
Dell Inspiron 14z i5




Mad Scientist
18911 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2456

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1883961 15-Oct-2017 20:08
Send private message

cadman:

 

Perhaps there's confusion about required durability under the Building Code B2 and feasible life. Non-structural cladding is only required to have a durability of >15 years.

 

 

Thanks, that could have been where they got 15 years from.

 

So i take it concrete and brick is very long lasting

 

vs hardy board type boards (is this even allowed as the sole cladding now?), corrugated iron, less durable?


7716 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2543

Subscriber

  Reply # 1883964 15-Oct-2017 20:19
Send private message

hardy board is fibre cement, and is still commonly used, as are timber weatherboards.




Mad Scientist
18911 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2456

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1883966 15-Oct-2017 20:26
Send private message

Technofreak:

 

Sixty years ago my Dad built the family home and clad it with Metalcraft weather board, which was basically the same galvanised iron sheeting material as used for corrugated iron roofing but pressed to a shape that looked like traditional weather boards.

 

About 2 years ago he decided to replace the cladding and at the same time installed insulation in the walls. The cladding was still in good condition when it was removed.

 

I'd say there's every chance you'd get 80 to 100 years out of corrugated iron presuming it was installed correctly.

 

 

That bit worries me a little bit.


301 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 6

Trusted

  Reply # 1883995 15-Oct-2017 20:42
Send private message

Bung: ... Apparently the old corrugated iron had twice as much Zinc on the weather side as the modern equivalent.

Indeed. Used to be "hot-dipped", now electroplated so fewer atoms thick :-)

 

Zinc protects even cut edges to a degree (by sacrificial corrosion). One would want some assurance about this (cut edges) aspect re eg the modern zincalume[RTM].




Mad Scientist
18911 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2456

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1883997 15-Oct-2017 20:48
Send private message

lapimate:

 

Bung: ... Apparently the old corrugated iron had twice as much Zinc on the weather side as the modern equivalent.

Indeed. Used to be "hot-dipped", now electroplated so a few atoms thick :-)

 

Zinc protects even cut edges to a degree (by sacrificial corrosion). One would want some assurance about this (cut edges) aspect re eg the modern zincalume[RTM].

 

 

Let me get this straight - that means the new ones are not as durable as the olden ones?


 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.