Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 476


  Reply # 1908873 28-Nov-2017 10:50
Send private message

epr: Hey I have just had solar panels installed and I am wondering if my power company will let me switch to a low user rate. I am guessing maybe not as they will now be buying some power back off me but if anyone has a good idea then I would appreciate a heads up.

 

Have you done your maths to confirm the economics?

 

Low users pay a higher daily charge (approx. $1 vs 33c from memory). Depending on your PV capacity and if you are able to shift your consumption (such as hot water, laundry, dishwasher) to consume all you solar energy and essentially have nothing left to export back to the grid, then the savings on the daily charge may exceed the additional cost of electricity in the evenings.


118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 1908896 28-Nov-2017 10:59
Send private message

tdgeek: It was probably a reasonable assumption back then.

 

 

It wasn't a reasonable assumption. I did some research at the time and there was, at best, only a moderate relationship between household income and electricity usage. Consequently, the High/Low electricity pricing regime is a poorly targeted subsidy. The transition to greater use of household solar generation will make it worse.

 

Given the objective of reducing energy costs for low income households, it would be much better to simply give a grant to low income households.


 
 
 
 


k14

580 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 75


  Reply # 1908898 28-Nov-2017 11:01
Send private message

tripper1000:

 

Have you done your maths to confirm the economics?

 

Low users pay a higher daily charge (approx. $1 vs 33c from memory). Depending on your PV capacity and if you are able to shift your consumption (such as hot water, laundry, dishwasher) to consume all you solar energy and essentially have nothing left to export back to the grid, then the savings on the daily charge may exceed the additional cost of electricity in the evenings.

 

 

Other way round, low users pay a lower daily charge and slightly higher unit charges.


118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 1908905 28-Nov-2017 11:11
Send private message

Picking up the earlier point about the merits of switching to a Low user tariff with solar, Wellington Electricity say:

 

In addition to providing price signals to consumers to shift consumption to periods outside of the peak demand period, our future pricing changes are likely to target ensuring that consumers with solar pay their full share of network capacity and demand costs, rather than being subsidised by consumers without solar.

 

Source: "2017/18 Pricing Methodology Disclosure", page 12. https://welectricity.co.nz/dmsdocument/110

 

I assume that other network companies will adopt similar policies. So, even if solar with the Low user tariff is worthwhile now, it may not stay that way.


3266 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1276

Subscriber

  Reply # 1908923 28-Nov-2017 11:48
One person supports this post
Send private message

There are lots of apartments in Auckland with central hot water systems (hot water provided by the body corporate). And which have very low heating costs as apartments don't have much external wall area. Yet almost all of them have electric cooking.

So they have high peak loads, but very low average usage. And no loads that are suitable for ripple control or other load management. Yet the low average use means they all qualify for the low user plans.

At the very least, the low user plans should be restricted to people who have a community services card. But they need to go, As they cause people to reduce their average power usage. But the cost of building and maintaining a power network is set by peak usage.





3511 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 985


  Reply # 1909009 28-Nov-2017 14:21
Send private message

Aredwood:  Yet the low average use means they all qualify for the low user plans.

 

Its the tariff of choice for pretty much every boomer bach owner I know.......


118 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 1909018 28-Nov-2017 14:40
Send private message

wellygary:

 

Aredwood:  Yet the low average use means they all qualify for the low user plans.

 

Its the tariff of choice for pretty much every boomer bach owner I know.......

 

 

That would be illegal, but hey...


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.