![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
semigeek: Slightly off topic, but for my Netflix, which was simultaneous viewing on 3 devices, it is now 2 devices + HD, for $7.99 a month. And I have been with Netflix for two years, I think it was changed last year. Viewing on 4 devices at the same time is $11.99 a month.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Dosh referral: 00001283 | Sharesies | Goodsync | Mighty Ape | Backblaze
freitasm on Keybase | My technology disclosure
sdav: I think its funny that in a global world where Sky buy content produced overseas they have a problem with people using an overseas company to now watch that content!
Anyway - I'm intrigued buy this. My cynical guess - this is driven by the content owners and it's a ploy by Sky to desperately keep the content (other than sport) they need to increase profits. Digital online rights are more important these days and sky has nothing to offer.
I feel if sky keep the online rights - we will be poorer for it. We being people who like to use anything other than a tablet.
Giggs:sdav: I think its funny that in a global world where Sky buy content produced overseas they have a problem with people using an overseas company to now watch that content!
Anyway - I'm intrigued buy this. My cynical guess - this is driven by the content owners and it's a ploy by Sky to desperately keep the content (other than sport) they need to increase profits. Digital online rights are more important these days and sky has nothing to offer.
I feel if sky keep the online rights - we will be poorer for it. We being people who like to use anything other than a tablet.
My understanding and I'm sure someone will correct me if I am wrong, is that VOD rights are starting to be sold separately to broadcasting rights so Sky had to get into this area or risk another player streaming shows they have broadcast rights for. Of course sport is not included for now simply because Sky has the rights sown up. The intriguing thing will be what happens when those deals start to expire and the various sports start selling broadcasting and streaming rights separately. NZ Rugby may have issue though since they rely on Sky to film the games so Sky are hardly likely to be happy if the streaming rights go elsewhere, but for overseas events all bets will be off.
As always content is king so no doubt there will be a battle between the various streaming services for rights. It also means that if Netflix launches here then the content will probably be quite different that you can get from Netflix USA.
freitasm:semigeek: Slightly off topic, but for my Netflix, which was simultaneous viewing on 3 devices, it is now 2 devices + HD, for $7.99 a month. And I have been with Netflix for two years, I think it was changed last year. Viewing on 4 devices at the same time is $11.99 a month.
It actually changed last month.
Procrastination eventually pays off.
StarBlazer: I really hope we don't end up with fragmented delivery between providers. Imagine if in the old days you could only rent certain videos from specific chains or that a particular film would only show at one cinema group. It doesn't make sense and yet we accept it for broadcast TV and sports! Why?
The distributor should make the series/film/event available for a fee - the same fee to all broadcasters (on demand, terrestrial or satellite) and whichever broadcasters wish to pay that for the content they can do. It's then down to the broadcaster to win dollars and subscriptions by offering a good service. If no broadcaster buys the product then the distributor needs to either bring the price down or produce better programming.
Previously known as psycik
OpenHAB: Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix, OpenHAB with Aeotech ZWave Controller, Raspberry PI, Wemos D1 Mini, Zwave, Xiaomi Humidity and Temperature sensors
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4 4k, ATV4, HDHomeRun Dual
Windows 10 Host Plex Server 3x3TB, 4x4TB using DriveBender, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Hyper-V Server with 1xW10, 2xUbuntu 20.04 LTS, Backblaze Backups, usenetprime.com
Inphinity:turb: This from the NZ Herald today:
Sky Television has unveiled a new subscription video-on-demand service that will be free for MySky customers and available for one-off purchases on tablets and mobile phones by non-Sky subscribers.
Where does this leave Sky subscribers who don't pay for mysky? lol
MileHighKiwi: I unsubscribed from Sky today after more than 10 years 'loyal' service. Reading this story today was a coincidence after I told the retention rep that lack of customised digital content was a reason for leaving, lol...but seriously, if you could unbundle their products and get it delivered online I'd still be a customer. I'd be happy to pay for a sports only package, say $149-199 per year? I know that's 'not the model', but come one, it's time for a change in the way they do business.
I don't anticipate that with this announcement but I hope it's on the cards. It was also a laugh when the Sky rep and I got talking about Netflix and he told me he has it too. How ironic, lol. I'm looking forward to seeing what they offer but don't have high hopes.
Satch:jtbthatsme: Plus it has always surprised me that people want to pay Sky so much anyway.
A good proportion of the population neither have the technical skills nor desire to set up DNS services as well as Netflix and other online streaming services. That is why MySky is so popular because it is easy - plug in and go.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |