Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 

SCM

457 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 47


  Reply # 1273000 29-Mar-2015 17:42
Send private message

I've been watching it via http://watchcric.net




 Click to see full size

 

 


3800 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2316

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1273002 29-Mar-2015 17:45
Send private message

Seems the reliability of the Skygo stream is due to them halving the bitrate. Ugh.

It's literally no better than the dodgy streams in terms of quality

N


 
 
 
 


Mad Scientist
19485 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2567

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1273018 29-Mar-2015 18:21
Send private message

don't bother watching it!!! *spits at the ground*




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


14202 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2617

Trusted

  Reply # 1273178 30-Mar-2015 09:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

A shocker. I expected that Oz would win, but we will be hard to beat. but, a shocker. Worst run rate for the first 10 overs since Mark Richardson days of the beige brigade according to Cricinfo..
Grant Elliot stood out again, showing up the rest of the team. Our aggressive brand of cricket? Not yesterday, we just rolled over, as if we played our final against SA.
Beaten, thats fine. Putting up a fight, thats fine. They never put up anything, exceot GE, and good on him, for being a surpris selection, criticised, and he ended up being the only player to turn up for the game, he clearly is not intimidated by his run yesterday and against SA. Maybe I sound harsh, but the rest of the team were intimidated, and the first game they abandoned their new brand of cricket.


75 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 7


  Reply # 1273179 30-Mar-2015 09:11
Send private message

If you use XBMC or Kodi as it's now called, then install this video addon P2P streams. There are a few tutorials on Utube. I used it to watch SkyUK  F1 HD channel on the big TV and have SkyGo on the Ipad for the Cricket. 

You'll see a list of loads of programs shed loads, but under sport there are the UK BT sport1,2 + SKY Sports 1-9999, French, Spanish... etc etc. and good bit Rates too.

Worth a play around with, works well over my VDSL on Waiheke Island.   



Mad Scientist
19485 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2567

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1273299 30-Mar-2015 11:34
Send private message

i would rather have spent my evening watching SA - Aus final.

waste of time




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


14476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1906


  Reply # 1273322 30-Mar-2015 11:42
Send private message

tdgeek: A shocker. I expected that Oz would win, but we will be hard to beat. but, a shocker. Worst run rate for the first 10 overs since Mark Richardson days of the beige brigade according to Cricinfo..
Grant Elliot stood out again, showing up the rest of the team. Our aggressive brand of cricket? Not yesterday, we just rolled over, as if we played our final against SA.
Beaten, thats fine. Putting up a fight, thats fine. They never put up anything, exceot GE, and good on him, for being a surpris selection, criticised, and he ended up being the only player to turn up for the game, he clearly is not intimidated by his run yesterday and against SA. Maybe I sound harsh, but the rest of the team were intimidated, and the first game they abandoned their new brand of cricket.




It was embarrassing. They still ended up with a good payday. You knew Austalia thought it was embarrassing, because they kept saying that the two best teams had made it to the final, and NZ deserved to be there this time, as they had played some of the best cricket, but you knew they didn't mean it. I just think they were too cocky, and under estimated the austalians, and simply weren't good enough. Australia did have a very strong advantage though playing on a home ground and they had already played recent games at the stadium. NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.

If you have a team that is better than you, I think you should bat second. That way you know the target to bat, and you should end up with a longer game, as the better team should be able to bat out their overs.In ODI's you should never be bowled out batting first.

3236 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 929

Trusted

  Reply # 1273325 30-Mar-2015 11:49
Send private message

mattwnz:
It was embarrassing. They still ended up with a good payday. You knew Austalia thought it was embarrassing, because they kept saying that the two best teams had made it to the final, and NZ deserved to be there this time, as they had played some of the best cricket, but you knew they didn't mean it. I just think they were too cocky, and under estimated the austalians, and simply weren't good enough. Australia did have a very strong advantage though playing on a home ground and they had already played recent games at the stadium. NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.


That seems a bit harsh.  I agree they were perhaps too cocky going into it (Well, really it was the media being too cocky.. as usual) but based on form in previous games I think they did deserve to be there.

3800 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2316

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1273326 30-Mar-2015 11:50
Send private message

mattwnz: (snip) NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.


Interesting. I was unaware you had extensive experience captaining international cricket squads. Here I was thinking that McCullum probably had more knowledge and experience than approximately every Internet commenter.

N

14202 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2617

Trusted

  Reply # 1273330 30-Mar-2015 11:52
Send private message

mattwnz:
tdgeek: A shocker. I expected that Oz would win, but we will be hard to beat. but, a shocker. Worst run rate for the first 10 overs since Mark Richardson days of the beige brigade according to Cricinfo..
Grant Elliot stood out again, showing up the rest of the team. Our aggressive brand of cricket? Not yesterday, we just rolled over, as if we played our final against SA.
Beaten, thats fine. Putting up a fight, thats fine. They never put up anything, exceot GE, and good on him, for being a surpris selection, criticised, and he ended up being the only player to turn up for the game, he clearly is not intimidated by his run yesterday and against SA. Maybe I sound harsh, but the rest of the team were intimidated, and the first game they abandoned their new brand of cricket.




It was embarrassing. They still ended up with a good payday. You knew Austalia thought it was embarrassing, because they kept saying that the two best teams had made it to the final, and NZ deserved to be there this time, as they had played some of the best cricket, but you knew they didn't mean it. I just think they were too cocky, and under estimated the austalians, and simply weren't good enough. Australia did have a very strong advantage though playing on a home ground and they had already played recent games at the stadium. NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.


Agree. Bat second, easier to chase, and our bowlers will be fresh. Given the talent we have, the talent that Grant Elliots showed again against a top nation, and how all the rest failed completely, I see it as a psychological failure. Maybe they played their final last week, and ran out of fight. It was embarrasing and takes a huge edge of this so called new brand of Black Caps cricket. We won't be intimidated, read that somewhere.

14476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1906


  Reply # 1273331 30-Mar-2015 11:55
Send private message

sidefx:
mattwnz:
It was embarrassing. They still ended up with a good payday. You knew Austalia thought it was embarrassing, because they kept saying that the two best teams had made it to the final, and NZ deserved to be there this time, as they had played some of the best cricket, but you knew they didn't mean it. I just think they were too cocky, and under estimated the austalians, and simply weren't good enough. Australia did have a very strong advantage though playing on a home ground and they had already played recent games at the stadium. NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.


That seems a bit harsh.  I agree they were perhaps too cocky going into it (Well, really it was the media being too cocky.. as usual) but based on form in previous games I think they did deserve to be there.


I am not saying they didn't deserve to be there,but I don't think the two best teams were the ones in the final. A Aus / SA game would have been a better fina. l I think the two best teams were Australia and South Africa.We were lucky to beat South Africa and the homeground advantage helped. South Africa are a better team, just that NZ beat them on the day, which happens in cricket, as there is a lot of luck in it. Bangladesh beats NZ on occasions, but that doesn't mean that Banglasdesh are better than NZ, if they bet them in a one off knockout game in a tournament .

14476 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1906


  Reply # 1273332 30-Mar-2015 11:59
Send private message

tdgeek:
mattwnz:
tdgeek: A shocker. I expected that Oz would win, but we will be hard to beat. but, a shocker. Worst run rate for the first 10 overs since Mark Richardson days of the beige brigade according to Cricinfo..
Grant Elliot stood out again, showing up the rest of the team. Our aggressive brand of cricket? Not yesterday, we just rolled over, as if we played our final against SA.
Beaten, thats fine. Putting up a fight, thats fine. They never put up anything, exceot GE, and good on him, for being a surpris selection, criticised, and he ended up being the only player to turn up for the game, he clearly is not intimidated by his run yesterday and against SA. Maybe I sound harsh, but the rest of the team were intimidated, and the first game they abandoned their new brand of cricket.




It was embarrassing. They still ended up with a good payday. You knew Austalia thought it was embarrassing, because they kept saying that the two best teams had made it to the final, and NZ deserved to be there this time, as they had played some of the best cricket, but you knew they didn't mean it. I just think they were too cocky, and under estimated the austalians, and simply weren't good enough. Australia did have a very strong advantage though playing on a home ground and they had already played recent games at the stadium. NZ should have never batted first, as batting during the day when that stadium causes some very bad shadows on the ground, would be difficult conditions to play in.


Agree. Bat second, easier to chase, and our bowlers will be fresh. Given the talent we have, the talent that Grant Elliots showed again against a top nation, and how all the rest failed completely, I see it as a psychological failure. Maybe they played their final last week, and ran out of fight. It was embarrasing and takes a huge edge of this so called new brand of Black Caps cricket. We won't be intimidated, read that somewhere.


Cricket is a very psychological game.Australia did bowl well though, but not so well to bowl them out for 180, with 5 ducks. That was a 300 plus ground. The NZ team hostorically is well known for it's batting collapses, and I thought that was well behind them, as top teams like Australia and South Africa rarely collapse like that . I too think they played their final last week, and if that had been the final, it would have been the best World Cup final.

Mad Scientist
19485 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2567

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1273341 30-Mar-2015 12:11
Send private message

Aka choked?




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


14202 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2617

Trusted

  Reply # 1273360 30-Mar-2015 12:34
Send private message

joker97: Aka choked?


Yep. The low or no score by most, the slow RR by all, choked. GE didnt, and he didnt against SA either. They didnt dare to achieve. bat to win and get bowled out, good on ya. Didnt do that. The CWCt games, they played aggressive. Thats the ONLY reason they won 8 on the trot. Dared to achieve, not scared of anyone. The bonus of aggressive batting is you might play yourself into form as you dont have to make so many decisions, momentum, pride, positiveness, pressure on the opposition bowlers adds to runs.

As Doull stated in a recent match, we dont want to be an honourable winner, may as well bat to win and get bowled out.

Oh well, a greta riode, just a pity that the final was so bad it takes away a lot of the last few weeks.   

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.