Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | ... | 70
mattwnz
16824 posts

Uber Geek


  #1473332 17-Jan-2016 18:49
Send private message

I think part of the issue is some providers are buying exclusive rights, which I presume they pay more for. Exclusive rights though create monopolies. I think the easy way around it, would be to outlaw exclusive rights agreements in NZ. If all providers were able to buy the content they wanted, and there was no exclusive rights to show that content, so multiple providers could show it, then that would create a more level playing field. It should also be better for consumers, as they then wouldn't need 5 different providers for their content, they may only need 2. Part of the problem in NZ, is we had one main player who used to have most of the content, meaning noone could compete. They do still have almost all the popular sport in NZ, but overtime that may change as online streaming gains more of a foothold.

 

Maybe the solution is what is happening in the US and UK. But NZ is a far smaller market, and can only sustain a few companies in this market.

MikeB4
15555 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1473333 17-Jan-2016 18:57
Send private message

mattwnz: I think part of the issue is some providers are buying exclusive rights, which I presume they pay more for. Exclusive rights though create monopolies. I think the easy way around it, would be to outlaw exclusive rights agreements in NZ. If all providers were able to buy the content they wanted, and there was no exclusive rights to show that content, so multiple providers could show it, then that would create a more level playing field. It should also be better for consumers, as they then wouldn't need 5 different providers for their content, they may only need 2. Part of the problem in NZ, is we had one main player who used to have most of the content, meaning noone could compete. They do still have almost all the popular sport in NZ, but overtime that may change as online streaming gains more of a foothold. Maybe the solution is what is happening in the US and UK. But NZ is a far smaller market, and can only sustain a few companies in this market.

 

 

 

I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.

 
 
 
 


Rikkitic
Awrrr
12922 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1473337 17-Jan-2016 19:02
Send private message

So why doesn't TV One sell the rights to its programming separately to Auckland, Christchurch and Wellington? Makes just as much sense.

 

 




I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


ockel
1780 posts

Uber Geek


  #1473338 17-Jan-2016 19:03
Send private message

mattwnz: I think part of the issue is some providers are buying exclusive rights, which I presume they pay more for. Exclusive rights though create monopolies. I think the easy way around it, would be to outlaw exclusive rights agreements in NZ. If all providers were able to buy the content they wanted, and there was no exclusive rights to show that content, so multiple providers could show it, then that would create a more level playing field. It should also be better for consumers, as they then wouldn't need 5 different providers for their content, they may only need 2. Part of the problem in NZ, is we had one main player who used to have most of the content, meaning noone could compete. They do still have almost all the popular sport in NZ, but overtime that may change as online streaming gains more of a foothold. Maybe the solution is what is happening in the US and UK. But NZ is a far smaller market, and can only sustain a few companies in this market.

 

 

 

So you'd like to force Netflix to sell rights to its own exclusive content to Lightbox et al??   And the premium that Netflix paid for exclusive streaming rights to the likes of Gotham, How to Get Away with Murder etc.....  redundant?

mattwnz
16824 posts

Uber Geek


  #1473342 17-Jan-2016 19:22
Send private message

MikeB4:  I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.
    In the ideal world yes, and it may work in big markets with big populations. But NZ is a tiny market, and as consumers, we tend to pay a lot more for things than overseas as a result, because of a lack of competition in areas. eg Super Markets, Building supplies, Mobile phone services prior to 2 degrees entering the market.  We do have laws that at least tried to prevent monopolies, and monopolistic behavior. You could say that telecom prior to unbundling, were free to run their business how they wanted and sell services to who they wanted at the price they wanted, but they got regulated for a reason.

MikeB4
15555 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1473345 17-Jan-2016 19:53
Send private message

mattwnz:
MikeB4:  I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.
    In the ideal world yes, and it may work in big markets with big populations. But NZ is a tiny market, and as consumers, we tend to pay a lot more for things than overseas as a result, because of a lack of competition in areas. eg Super Markets, Building supplies, Mobile phone services prior to 2 degrees entering the market.  We do have laws that at least tried to prevent monopolies, and monopolistic behavior. You could say that telecom prior to unbundling, were free to run their business how they wanted and sell services to who they wanted at the price they wanted, but they got regulated for a reason.

 

The studios don't care if NZ is a small market, they sell for the lowest cost and highest return knowing that the returns and market are rounding errors. They deal with Netflix US and that's the extent of their dealings.

 

I also believe we would not Netflix yet if it were not for our larger neighbor.

 

 

mattwnz
16824 posts

Uber Geek


  #1473347 17-Jan-2016 19:58
Send private message

MikeB4:
mattwnz:
MikeB4:  I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.
    In the ideal world yes, and it may work in big markets with big populations. But NZ is a tiny market, and as consumers, we tend to pay a lot more for things than overseas as a result, because of a lack of competition in areas. eg Super Markets, Building supplies, Mobile phone services prior to 2 degrees entering the market.  We do have laws that at least tried to prevent monopolies, and monopolistic behavior. You could say that telecom prior to unbundling, were free to run their business how they wanted and sell services to who they wanted at the price they wanted, but they got regulated for a reason.
The studios don't care if NZ is a small market, they sell for the lowest cost and highest return knowing that the returns and market are rounding errors. They deal with Netflix US and that's the extent of their dealings. I also believe we would not Netflix yet if it were not for our larger neighbor.  

 

 

 

But is NZ better off now because we have a local version of Netflix. Is Australia as affected by this in terms of the content they have available for free? I believe  much of the sport in Australia is available free to air, unlike in NZ where most is with one provider. People got the US version in NZ before using VPNs, and had full access to all the programs. Would Netflix be planning on blocking it in NZ, if they didn't provide a NZ version? I would think not, as then they wouldn't have any NZ customers at all.

 
 
 
 


sultanoswing
763 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1473349 17-Jan-2016 20:08
Send private message

MikeB4:
I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.


Yep. That's fine. So long as consumers have the reciprocal right to purchase the same content from multiple providers at the best price as they see fit i.e. not hobbled by artificial geoblocks and antiquated regional restrictions.

[Edited for clarity of meaning that the consumer should be able to shop for the same content across multiple providers a la most tangible goods.]

DjShadow
3319 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1473352 17-Jan-2016 20:17
Send private message

Netflix (via Unotelly) just stopped working on our Sony Android TV, rebooted router + cable modem and no diff.

 

However tried our older Sony home theater that has Netflix and still works.

MikeB4
15555 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1473354 17-Jan-2016 20:20
Send private message

sultanoswing:
MikeB4:
I believe the rights owners should be free to sell their rights as they see fit be multiple buyers or sole rights.


Yep. That's fine. So long as consumers have the reciprocal right to purchase the content from multiple providers at the best price as they see fit i.e. not hobbled by artificial geoblocks and antiquated regional restrictions.

 

 

 

You do have content available from multiple providers, not necessarily the content.

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
68808 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1473382 17-Jan-2016 20:41
Send private message

DjShadow: Netflix (via Unotelly) just stopped working on our Sony Android TV, rebooted router + cable modem and no diff. However tried our older Sony home theater that has Netflix and still works.

 

 

 

And do you block/redirect Google and OpenDNS as per this post?





 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Coinbase | TheMarket | My technology disclosure


DjShadow
3319 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1473386 17-Jan-2016 20:53
Send private message

freitasm:

 

DjShadow: Netflix (via Unotelly) just stopped working on our Sony Android TV, rebooted router + cable modem and no diff. However tried our older Sony home theater that has Netflix and still works.

 

 

 

And do you block/redirect Google and OpenDNS as per this post?

 

 

I will once I can find the settings in my Airport Extreme...

tstone
331 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1473490 18-Jan-2016 09:25
Send private message

Saturday evening my Netflix on Xbox One, using Unblock-US, accessing USA content stopped working. I've yet to trawl through the Unblock-US support forums to try and identify if this can be resolved.

 

 

 

https://goo.gl/photos/sr6N8EuTWwZmsoQe8

 

 

SaltyNZ
5474 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1473493 18-Jan-2016 09:28
Send private message

tstone: Saturday evening my Netflix on Xbox One, using Unblock-US, accessing USA content stopped working. I've yet to trawl through the Unblock-US support forums to try and identify if this can be resolved.   https://goo.gl/photos/sr6N8EuTWwZmsoQe8  

 

 

 

We were watching Netflix Canada via Unblock-US last night. I wonder if they are blocking proxies via some DNS servers but not others? Unblock-US currently tells me to configure a different pair of DNS servers to what it originally told me to use. AFAIK the old ones are still working since I have a couple of devices that have those configured, but others have the new ones. (Stupid Asus router only lets you enter one DNS server, and insists on itself being the second one, which is useless).




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


tdgeek
21495 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1473538 18-Jan-2016 10:07
Send private message

mattwnz: I think part of the issue is some providers are buying exclusive rights, which I presume they pay more for. Exclusive rights though create monopolies. I think the easy way around it, would be to outlaw exclusive rights agreements in NZ. If all providers were able to buy the content they wanted, and there was no exclusive rights to show that content, so multiple providers could show it, then that would create a more level playing field. It should also be better for consumers, as they then wouldn't need 5 different providers for their content, they may only need 2. Part of the problem in NZ, is we had one main player who used to have most of the content, meaning noone could compete. They do still have almost all the popular sport in NZ, but overtime that may change as online streaming gains more of a foothold. Maybe the solution is what is happening in the US and UK. But NZ is a far smaller market, and can only sustain a few companies in this market.

 

Sky has always had competition if others chose to purchase the content but they didnt. Lately some providers have outbid Sky, power to them.

 

Now, if content owners sold rights to everyone, that woud be great. No restrictions. I could watch everything on TVOne, Sky, Netflix, Quickflix, Lightbox, Neon, etc, etc. The rights would be very cheap as they are spread over everyone. TVOne would be able to have FTA, plas a cheap pay service $13 a month. Sky can reduce their subscription as many contents are cheap. We would have multiple providers all selling the same thing. The provider that made that the easiest to access will win. No one will have more than one provider in theory. This is what many here are hoping for? If the contebt owners get the same revenue I doubt they will care what happens. It could be like Telco's here, all sell the same thing at the same prices, near enough, so added value and service become king. Then I guess one provider gets a cool added value service exclusive, and they become a monopoly, as there is no reason to stay with any other provider. All theory off course

1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | ... | 70
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS1621+ 
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32


NordVPN starts deploying colocated servers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 09:00


Google introduces Nest Wifi routers in New Zealand
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Orcon to bundle Google Nest Wifi router with new accounts
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Epay and Centrapay partner to create digital gift cards
Posted 2-Oct-2020 17:34


Inseego launches 5G MiFi M2000 mobile hotspot
Posted 2-Oct-2020 14:53









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.