Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | ... | 70
2688 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510503 10-Mar-2016 12:28
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Physical Parallel importing is legal, thats already been decided. You can import Jandals to NZ as its legal, unless the Jandall company makes a business decision not to sell to NZ

 

Importing digital content is legal. But if the T+C says its for US only, then its breaking T+C's, not legal, in a civil case. Simple. The seller is deciding what to digitally parallel export to you.

 

 

My question is more around why the Government is allowing the parallel importing of physical media to remain under its TPPA obligations, but is refusing to make the same distinction for digital content. My hypothesis is that making this consistent in either direction would hurt corporate interests, and this is why it's their current stance. 


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510508 10-Mar-2016 12:33
Send private message

old3eyes:

 

tdgeek:

 

dclegg:

 

So the Government is cool with people parallel importing content on physical media, but not when doing so via digital channels. Why the double-standard?

 

One theory may be that large corporate interests would be negatively affected if they banned the former, as they sell a lot of parallel imported media. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Physical Parallel importing is legal, thats already been decided. You can import Jandals to NZ as its legal, unless the Jandall company makes a business decision not to sell to NZ

 

Importing digital content is legal. But if the T+C says its for US only, then its breaking T+C's, not legal, in a civil case. Simple. The seller is deciding what to digitally parallel export to you.

 

 

 

 

I've noticed in all your posts over the past few weeks that you seem to side with big media and treat all of us who use unblocking services like we are all criminals.  Do you work for big media??

 

 

 

 

No.

 

 

 

I use Netflix. And I am not telling you that you and I are criminals, thats just adding words to your post for effect. Not cool

 

 

 

If you speed, you can, and you want to, so you do

 

If you pay for a radar detector so you can speed in safety of being caught, you do

 

If you torrent, you can, suits you, so you do

 

 

 

Bypassing a geoblock is no different. You are getting or using something that you are not entitled to, and we know it

 

 

 

That is the trend of my posts, please don't distort them. There is right and wrong, some choose to move that line as and when suited, thats the reality

 

But choosing what rules to abide by or break, thats ok

 

 


 
 
 
 


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510514 10-Mar-2016 12:39
Send private message

dclegg:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Physical Parallel importing is legal, thats already been decided. You can import Jandals to NZ as its legal, unless the Jandall company makes a business decision not to sell to NZ

 

Importing digital content is legal. But if the T+C says its for US only, then its breaking T+C's, not legal, in a civil case. Simple. The seller is deciding what to digitally parallel export to you.

 

 

My question is more around why the Government is allowing the parallel importing of physical media to remain under its TPPA obligations, but is refusing to make the same distinction for digital content. My hypothesis is that making this consistent in either direction would hurt corporate interests, and this is why it's their current stance. 

 

 

 

 

My personal opinion is that selling physical media globally is possibly its best revenue stream left. But when media companies sell rights to various regions, which involve various deals with linear TV players, SVOD players, Sky type players, that the need to manage the distribution is there to maxmise revenue. After that hurrah, I gather the DVD to anywhere is whats left.

 

 

 

My assumptions only 


1699 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1510518 10-Mar-2016 12:43
Send private message

mdf:

 

robbon44:

 

 

 

I would be happy with the global catalogue at a reasonable price, i dont want multiple suppliers...i understand the competative market element but quality and longevity is what i want..

 

 

The price of a global market catalogue is potentially fraught. The English Premier League is a great example. Say EPL decided to sell direct to the global public. The price is likely to be dictated largely by English consumers, who would probably jump at the opportunity to pay around 40 quid a month for all EPL games (BSkyB currently has about two-thirds of the games for 45 quid per month). That equates to $85-ish NZ per month at today's exchange rates - which isn't that much less than the $99 Premier League Pass is charging for the _season_. While there's obviously an optimal return on price vs subscriber numbers, I could imagine New Zealand paying a whole lot more for some things with a single global catalogue.

 

 

Didnt PremierLeaguePass charge $199 for the season - and its currently $99 for the remaining half season?


5089 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1510521 10-Mar-2016 12:51
Send private message

dclegg:

tdgeek:


 


Physical Parallel importing is legal, thats already been decided. You can import Jandals to NZ as its legal, unless the Jandall company makes a business decision not to sell to NZ


Importing digital content is legal. But if the T+C says its for US only, then its breaking T+C's, not legal, in a civil case. Simple. The seller is deciding what to digitally parallel export to you.



My question is more around why the Government is allowing the parallel importing of physical media to remain under its TPPA obligations, but is refusing to make the same distinction for digital content. My hypothesis is that making this consistent in either direction would hurt corporate interests, and this is why it's their current stance. 



I'm on mobile at the moment, but I posted a while back some excerpts of the TPPA text that explain it. There is an explicit carve-out for physical parallel imports, with around 5 other clauses that ban geo-lock bypasses, AND make any infringement a criminal offence.

Obviously I must be wrong because the PM said no law changes would be required... But now there are. OH DEAR I'M SO SHOCKED AND CONFUSED.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone XS + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Lock him up!
10795 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1510523 10-Mar-2016 12:55
2 people support this post
Send private message

Bad laws create contempt for all laws. Civil matters just invite civil disobedience. I would not violate any criminal law but I also would not hesitate to look for ways to enable me to safely commit a civil offense if I felt the law in question was unjust or unreasonable. All too often, the law really is an ass. There are countless examples of muddled legislation that has proven unworkable in practise because it was hastily conceived in a state of panic, or created to appease a powerful vested interest, or simple drawn up by corrupt or incompetent legislators. Laws have to make sense and a law that says I cannot view content that is freely available to others but forbidden to me solely because I happen to have the misfortune to reside in an insignificant backwater country that no-one gives a damn about, is not a law I have any desire or intention to respect.

 

And yet once again, let me make clear that I am NOT talking about piracy, which is obtaining paid content for free. I am talking about choice, which is my right (yes, right) to pay for something that happens to be distributed somewhere else.

 

 

 

 

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510530 10-Mar-2016 13:02
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Bad laws create contempt for all laws. Civil matters just invite civil disobedience. I would not violate any criminal law but I also would not hesitate to look for ways to enable me to safely commit a civil offense if I felt the law in question was unjust or unreasonable. All too often, the law really is an ass. There are countless examples of muddled legislation that has proven unworkable in practise because it was hastily conceived in a state of panic, or created to appease a powerful vested interest, or simple drawn up by corrupt or incompetent legislators. Laws have to make sense and a law that says I cannot view content that is freely available to others but forbidden to me solely because I happen to have the misfortune to reside in an insignificant backwater country that no-one gives a damn about, is not a law I have any desire or intention to respect.

 

And yet once again, let me make clear that I am NOT talking about piracy, which is obtaining paid content for free. I am talking about choice, which is my right (yes, right) to pay for something that happens to be distributed somewhere else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think the first bold covers it nicely.

 

Its not about the law, its about this bold highlight.

 

And it is the same as piracy. Torrenting is getting content that you are not eligible for. Geo unblocking is the same. That you are paying for it is not relevant, it's more a not guilty feeling. There are reasons why the owner decides not to sell it to you, right now. Target them, not NF, Govt or TPPA.

 

 


 
 
 
 


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510531 10-Mar-2016 13:05
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
dclegg:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Physical Parallel importing is legal, thats already been decided. You can import Jandals to NZ as its legal, unless the Jandall company makes a business decision not to sell to NZ

 

 

 

Importing digital content is legal. But if the T+C says its for US only, then its breaking T+C's, not legal, in a civil case. Simple. The seller is deciding what to digitally parallel export to you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

My question is more around why the Government is allowing the parallel importing of physical media to remain under its TPPA obligations, but is refusing to make the same distinction for digital content. My hypothesis is that making this consistent in either direction would hurt corporate interests, and this is why it's their current stance. 

 



I'm on mobile at the moment, but I posted a while back some excerpts of the TPPA text that explain it. There is an explicit carve-out for physical parallel imports, with around 5 other clauses that ban geo-lock bypasses, AND make any infringement a criminal offence.

Obviously I must be wrong because the PM said no law changes would be required... But now there are. OH DEAR I'M SO SHOCKED AND CONFUSED.

 

 

 

It is

 

 

 

Copyright infringement isn't criminal is it? So why geo block, its the same thing in terms of allowing the product to be used


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510532 10-Mar-2016 13:08
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Bad laws create contempt for all laws. Civil matters just invite civil disobedience. I would not violate any criminal law but I also would not hesitate to look for ways to enable me to safely commit a civil offense if I felt the law in question was unjust or unreasonable. All too often, the law really is an ass. There are countless examples of muddled legislation that has proven unworkable in practise because it was hastily conceived in a state of panic, or created to appease a powerful vested interest, or simple drawn up by corrupt or incompetent legislators. Laws have to make sense and a law that says I cannot view content that is freely available to others but forbidden to me solely because I happen to have the misfortune to reside in an insignificant backwater country that no-one gives a damn about, is not a law I have any desire or intention to respect.

 

And yet once again, let me make clear that I am NOT talking about piracy, which is obtaining paid content for free. I am talking about choice, which is my right (yes, right) to pay for something that happens to be distributed somewhere else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shouldnt you be referring to the owners of said content? No Govt has told Netflix to ban you from viewing some of its titles. Neither has Netflix.


3903 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1510542 10-Mar-2016 13:21
2 people support this post
Send private message

Things like this are why I've moved away from considering cord cutting as an option, and have simply reverted to pirating everything.

 

Also goes to show how hugely corrupt the TPPA process is, and how much the US and NZ governments are in the pockets of big media / big business.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.


Lock him up!
10795 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1510543 10-Mar-2016 13:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Shouldnt you be referring to the owners of said content? No Govt has told Netflix to ban you from viewing some of its titles. Neither has Netflix.

 

 

This government is about to enforce that ban, if the information here and elsewhere is correct. If they do, I will do what I can to ignore it. Some people are much too quick to bend over just because someone tells them to.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


3357 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1510549 10-Mar-2016 13:29
Send private message

wasnt there an ISP actually telling people how to set this up originally?

 

i hope netflix in time gets to its goal of having globally equal access to content, but i think with so many rights its going to take at least a few more years yet.

 

either way netflix is still a good product.


2688 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510550 10-Mar-2016 13:30
2 people support this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

And it is the same as piracy. Torrenting is getting content that you are not eligible for. Geo unblocking is the same. That you are paying for it is not relevant, it's more a not guilty feeling. There are reasons why the owner decides not to sell it to you, right now. Target them, not NF, Govt or TPPA.

 

 

No it is not the same as piracy. If I was pirating, I'd be paying nobody. If I pay an overseas service, then I am committing to a revenue stream that can then be used to compensate the content creators. 

 

It also highlights the discrepancy between physical and digital media. The content owner has decided that I'm not eligible to watch a disc categorised for a region that I've not been deemed to be a part of. But our government has decided that it is 100% OK for local resellers to ignore and overcome this region barrier.


18307 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1510554 10-Mar-2016 13:38
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Shouldnt you be referring to the owners of said content? No Govt has told Netflix to ban you from viewing some of its titles. Neither has Netflix.

 

 

This government is about to enforce that ban, if the information here and elsewhere is correct. If they do, I will do what I can to ignore it. Some people are much too quick to bend over just because someone tells them to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yourb reverrting back to the law, its the seller of the content you have a gripe with. So the owner of the contact doesn't want to sell to you today, so you are happy to break T+C, thats ok. Its" just" a T+C as you say. But if someone wants to enforce it thats a problem?

 

Dont get me wrong, I not in favour of geo blocking and so on, but I do see the right and wrong in most things in life, and thus, like radar detectors and piracy is wrong.

 

And while I may or may not have participated in such wrong things, which I have, I still know they are wrong, I don't seek justifications to make it seem ok


1699 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1510556 10-Mar-2016 13:39
Send private message

dclegg:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

And it is the same as piracy. Torrenting is getting content that you are not eligible for. Geo unblocking is the same. That you are paying for it is not relevant, it's more a not guilty feeling. There are reasons why the owner decides not to sell it to you, right now. Target them, not NF, Govt or TPPA.

 

 

No it is not the same as piracy. If I was pirating, I'd be paying nobody. If I pay an overseas service, then I am committing to a revenue stream that can then be used to compensate the content creators. 

 

It also highlights the discrepancy between physical and digital media. The content owner has decided that I'm not eligible to watch a disc categorised for a region that I've not been deemed to be a part of. But our government has decided that it is 100% OK for local resellers to ignore and overcome this region barrier.

 

 

But you're not paying a revenue stream that is being used to compensate the content creators.  Netflix have already paid their price for the right to sell in the US.  Others have paid the right to sell elsewhere.

 

All you are doing is transferring wealth to Netflix shareholders - not the content creators.


1 | ... | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | ... | 70
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft launches first Experience Center worldwide for Asia Pacific in Singapore
Posted 13-Nov-2019 13:08


Disney+ comes to LG Smart TVs
Posted 13-Nov-2019 12:55


Spark launches new wireless broadband "Unplan Metro"
Posted 11-Nov-2019 08:19


Malwarebytes overhauls flagship product with new UI, faster engine and lighter footprint
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:48


CarbonClick launches into Digital Marketplaces
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:42


Kordia offers Microsoft Azure Peering Service
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:41


Spark 5G live on Auckland Harbour for Emirates Team New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2019 17:30


BNZ and Vodafone partner to boost NZ Tech for SME
Posted 31-Oct-2019 17:14


Nokia 7.2 available in New Zealand
Posted 31-Oct-2019 16:24


2talk launches Microsoft Teams Direct Routing product
Posted 29-Oct-2019 10:35


New Breast Cancer Foundation app puts power in Kiwi women's hands
Posted 25-Oct-2019 16:13


OPPO Reno2 Series lands, alongside hybrid noise-cancelling Wireless Headphones
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:32


Waikato Data Scientists awarded $13 million from the Government
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:27


D-Link launches Wave 2 Unified Access Points
Posted 24-Oct-2019 15:07


LG Electronics begins distributing the G8X THINQ
Posted 24-Oct-2019 10:58



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.