Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | ... | 70
4420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1931

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1511031 11-Mar-2016 07:26
One person supports this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Wrong. Its copyrighted. Don't you read the fine print?? (I don't either), but its copyrighted. Give it 50 years at last look, and its public domain

 

 

 

 

It'll be 70 years after the TPP. So hooray for Lorde's great great great grandchildren, who will now be able to collect an annual $2 royalty cheque to split between them. Or, possibly, hooray for Disney who can continue to rake in billion dollar profits off a bunch of movie ideas they got from the public domain for another 20 years.





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


4420 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1931

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1511033 11-Mar-2016 07:30
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

It wont happen overnight but it will happen (TM) 

 

 

I hope you remembered to pay the rights holder for that quote.





iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


2545 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 103


  Reply # 1511040 11-Mar-2016 08:07
2 people support this post
Send private message

i still think the point that wasting NZ tax payers money to create a law would be ludicrous when Netflix clearly dont really care about their T&Cs, if they did they would just cancel all accounts accessing the US site via Geo blocking.

 

Companines getting governments to inforce T&C's is just outrageous imo.


1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 741


  Reply # 1511051 11-Mar-2016 08:39
2 people support this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Rikkitic:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Wrong. Its copyrighted. Don't you read the fine print?? (I don't either), but its copyrighted. Give it 50 years at last look, and its public domain

 

 

Don't you read the posts? Yes, it is copyrighted, and it is being paid for.

 

 

 

 

 

 

No its not, did you make payment that will go to the owners of the content, no, it goes 100% to Netflix only. But you got what you required. 

 

And yes I do.

 

 

OK if we're talking revenue streams, answer these questions:

 

1 - what's the difference in me in NZ paying Netflix UK as a new subscriber, vs Joe Bloggs in UK doing the same, from the studios' revenue perspective?

 

2 - what's the difference between me in NZ paying Netflix UK to watch Breaking Bad, vs me paying an NZ-based SVOD provider, again from the studios' revenue perspective?

 

So, unless you can think of an answer other than "none at all", your argument that it's piracy/bootlegging because all revenue goes only to Netflix is specious and irrelevant.


12597 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5912

Trusted

  Reply # 1511089 11-Mar-2016 09:11
Send private message

shk292:

tdgeek:


Rikkitic:


tdgeek:


 


Wrong. Its copyrighted. Don't you read the fine print?? (I don't either), but its copyrighted. Give it 50 years at last look, and its public domain



Don't you read the posts? Yes, it is copyrighted, and it is being paid for.


 



 


No its not, did you make payment that will go to the owners of the content, no, it goes 100% to Netflix only. But you got what you required. 


And yes I do.



OK if we're talking revenue streams, answer these questions:


1 - what's the difference in me in NZ paying Netflix UK as a new subscriber, vs Joe Bloggs in UK doing the same, from the studios' revenue perspective?


2 - what's the difference between me in NZ paying Netflix UK to watch Breaking Bad, vs me paying an NZ-based SVOD provider, again from the studios' revenue perspective?


So, unless you can think of an answer other than "none at all", your argument that it's piracy/bootlegging because all revenue goes only to Netflix is specious and irrelevant.



Easy

1. Reduced ROI

2. As above




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


12528 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2219

Trusted

  Reply # 1511107 11-Mar-2016 10:08
Send private message

MikeB4:
shk292:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Rikkitic:

 

 

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wrong. Its copyrighted. Don't you read the fine print?? (I don't either), but its copyrighted. Give it 50 years at last look, and its public domain

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don't you read the posts? Yes, it is copyrighted, and it is being paid for.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No its not, did you make payment that will go to the owners of the content, no, it goes 100% to Netflix only. But you got what you required. 

 

 

 

And yes I do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

OK if we're talking revenue streams, answer these questions:

 

 

 

1 - what's the difference in me in NZ paying Netflix UK as a new subscriber, vs Joe Bloggs in UK doing the same, from the studios' revenue perspective?

 

 

 

2 - what's the difference between me in NZ paying Netflix UK to watch Breaking Bad, vs me paying an NZ-based SVOD provider, again from the studios' revenue perspective?

 

 

 

So, unless you can think of an answer other than "none at all", your argument that it's piracy/bootlegging because all revenue goes only to Netflix is specious and irrelevant.

 



Easy

1. Reduced ROI

2. As above

 

 

 

To expand, as Ockel has many many times

 

1. Your paying Netflix only. Quite obvious, its not the studios

 

2. Your paying Netflix only, not the studios, you should be paying the SVOD provider here, as they paid the studios, and therefore your payment will be used to fund that studios payment

 

As Mike said reduced ROI (Return On Investment)

 

 

 

 


12528 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2219

Trusted

  Reply # 1511114 11-Mar-2016 10:14
Send private message

Lias:

 

 I swear a decent number of people on this thread must work for big media companies, Lightbox, Quickflix, Sky, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I dont think that comes into it. I am sure everyone on here as or did take advantage of the alternative sources, or geo unblocking. Either geo unblocking is cheating the system or its not. In my opinion its obviously yes. If someone wants to cheat the system as they can thats fine, just don't justify it as all kosher.

 

Do people get a radar detector as they believe the speed limit is unfair and the fines too expensive? No. They get them to allow them to speed and not get caught. No idea why they are legal, but they are, and thats another story, especially with the safety element

 

 


2467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 667


  Reply # 1511115 11-Mar-2016 10:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

Personally, I think the real issue is the content that is not provided here by ANYONE.

If there's no legal way for me to pay a local provider for the content, the 'most' legal way is to pay A provider who has legal right to provide the content, even if T&C limits geographically, and the closest analogy to this is again a DVD... Which I AM legally allowed to import and play on my 'zone free' player... Just like the US NF plays locally once I've bought a 'pass' (postage?) to watch it as if I'm in the USA.

Interestingly, my NZ Netflix account ENTITLES me to watch US content if I were physically visiting there too... So it's ROI to the producer is the same then, and only AirNZ would make the extra for me to be there...

1297 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 165


  Reply # 1511119 11-Mar-2016 10:23
Send private message

PhantomNVD: Personally, I think the real issue is the content that is not provided here by ANYONE.

If there's no legal way for me to pay a local provider for the content, the 'most' legal way is to pay A provider who has legal right to provide the content, even if T&C limits geographically, and the closest analogy to this is again a DVD... Which I AM legally allowed to import and play on my 'zone free' player... Just like the US NF plays locally once I've bought a 'pass' (postage?) to watch it as if I'm in the USA.

Interestingly, my NZ Netflix account ENTITLES me to watch US content if I were physically visiting there too... So it's ROI to the producer is the same then, and only AirNZ would make the extra for me to be there...

 

Well the example given before was Breaking Bad.  Which is available both on Lightbox and Quickflix.  Will you pay the extra $13/mth to see it and other content Lightbox has but Netflix NZ does not?  Why does Netflix NZ not pony up and pay as another non-exclusive provider of Breaking Bad in NZ?  ROI.  

 

So please give some examples of content that you cant view here that you want to.


1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 741


  Reply # 1511149 11-Mar-2016 10:49
One person supports this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

 

 

To expand, as Ockel has many many times

 

1. Your paying Netflix only. Quite obvious, its not the studios

 

2. Your paying Netflix only, not the studios, you should be paying the SVOD provider here, as they paid the studios, and therefore your payment will be used to fund that studios payment

 

As Mike said reduced ROI (Return On Investment) 

 

 

My point here, which you seem to be agreeing with by not addressing it at all, is that my decision to pay for access to material has exactly the same effect to the rights holder whether I pay Netflix UK or Sky NZ or Lightbox or anyone else.

 

So it is completely wrong to assert that geo-unblocking is immoral, wrong or analogous to bootlegging; under the current licensing model, my choice of SVOD provider and region has exactly zero effect on the rights holders' revenue streams.  The only parties affected are the local distributors.

 

This whole problem/dispute is purely a symptom of the anachronistic licensing model in use


12597 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5912

Trusted

  Reply # 1511163 11-Mar-2016 11:04
Send private message

shk292:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

 

 

To expand, as Ockel has many many times

 

1. Your paying Netflix only. Quite obvious, its not the studios

 

2. Your paying Netflix only, not the studios, you should be paying the SVOD provider here, as they paid the studios, and therefore your payment will be used to fund that studios payment

 

As Mike said reduced ROI (Return On Investment) 

 

 

My point here, which you seem to be agreeing with by not addressing it at all, is that my decision to pay for access to material has exactly the same effect to the rights holder whether I pay Netflix UK or Sky NZ or Lightbox or anyone else.

 

So it is completely wrong to assert that geo-unblocking is immoral, wrong or analogous to bootlegging; under the current licensing model, my choice of SVOD provider and region has exactly zero effect on the rights holders' revenue streams.  The only parties affected are the local distributors.

 

This whole problem/dispute is purely a symptom of the anachronistic licensing model in use

 

 

 

 

If the Studio agrees to sell rights to Netflix to play a movie only in the US. You circumvent T&C's and watch it here in NZ through NF US, the studio has not been pain for you viewing it. So, $10  for US rights only, $20 for US and NZ rights so by circumventing $10 is lost to the studio bringing a reduced ROI, reduced returns on investment will flow onto less investment and a lose, lose scenario.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 741


  Reply # 1511167 11-Mar-2016 11:08
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

 

 

If the Studio agrees to sell rights to Netflix to play a movie only in the US. You circumvent T&C's and watch it here in NZ through NF US, the studio has not been pain for you viewing it. So, $10  for US rights only, $20 for US and NZ rights so by circumventing $10 is lost to the studio bringing a reduced ROI, reduced returns on investment will flow onto less investment and a lose, lose scenario.

 

 

Wrong, because I'm paring the equivalent charge in the UK or US, so the equivalent revenue share is finding its way back to the rights holder.  Just like if I were a US viewer


2612 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 604

Trusted

  Reply # 1511178 11-Mar-2016 11:10
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

If the Studio agrees to sell rights to Netflix to play a movie only in the US. You circumvent T&C's and watch it here in NZ through NF US, the studio has not been pain for you viewing it. So, $10  for US rights only, $20 for US and NZ rights so by circumventing $10 is lost to the studio bringing a reduced ROI, reduced returns on investment will flow onto less investment and a lose, lose scenario.

 

 

One thing this argument doesn't consider are SVOD providers that are also the owners or creators of the content. I can't speak for others, but 66.66% of the SVOD providers I geo-unblock fit into this category.


12597 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5912

Trusted

  Reply # 1511181 11-Mar-2016 11:18
Send private message

shk292:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

If the Studio agrees to sell rights to Netflix to play a movie only in the US. You circumvent T&C's and watch it here in NZ through NF US, the studio has not been pain for you viewing it. So, $10  for US rights only, $20 for US and NZ rights so by circumventing $10 is lost to the studio bringing a reduced ROI, reduced returns on investment will flow onto less investment and a lose, lose scenario.

 

 

Wrong, because I'm paring the equivalent charge in the UK or US, so the equivalent revenue share is finding its way back to the rights holder.  Just like if I were a US viewer

 

 

 

 

No, the studio has a price for the US and a price for NZ it is not either or it is both. They are in effect charging you say $20 her not the $10 payable in the US. If NF has paid for ONLY US viewing then only US viewing it is. you may not

 

like it but that's life.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1478 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 741


  Reply # 1511194 11-Mar-2016 11:38
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

shk292:

 

MikeB4:

 

 

 

If the Studio agrees to sell rights to Netflix to play a movie only in the US. You circumvent T&C's and watch it here in NZ through NF US, the studio has not been pain for you viewing it. So, $10  for US rights only, $20 for US and NZ rights so by circumventing $10 is lost to the studio bringing a reduced ROI, reduced returns on investment will flow onto less investment and a lose, lose scenario.

 

 

Wrong, because I'm paring the equivalent charge in the UK or US, so the equivalent revenue share is finding its way back to the rights holder.  Just like if I were a US viewer

 

 

 

 

No, the studio has a price for the US and a price for NZ it is not either or it is both. They are in effect charging you say $20 her not the $10 payable in the US. If NF has paid for ONLY US viewing then only US viewing it is. you may not

 

like it but that's life.

 

 

I give up.  You're completely missing the point, deliberately or not I don't care.  As others have said, this has become a circular argument and I'm butting out of it


1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | ... | 70
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.