Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70
Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1598220 25-Jul-2016 14:25
2 people support this post
Send private message

networkn:

 

 

 

Well that is what YOU want, but this isn't reality. What is "fair" to you? What if that isn't "fair" to me? What if I put a lot of time/effort into my business for little or no profit for the first 5 years and then in the second 5 years required to "balance" that by maximising my profits? Am I not allowed? 

 

Do you know how much money each of these corporates make, what the actual profit margins are? What is acceptable to you? Why do YOU get to decide over anyone else?

 

I understand what you are saying, but I really don't understand how it can be realistic?

 

 

What exclusive regional rights gives is an effective monopoly. Generally speaking we don't allow monopolies because they are bad for our economy - they inhibit innovation, the supply inferior products or services at inflated prices. This is good for the (right holding) business, but bad for consumers. Not quite sure why/how content escapes anti-competition laws. 





Twitter: ajobbins


11523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5243

Trusted

  Reply # 1598222 25-Jul-2016 14:29
Send private message

ajobbins:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

Well that is what YOU want, but this isn't reality. What is "fair" to you? What if that isn't "fair" to me? What if I put a lot of time/effort into my business for little or no profit for the first 5 years and then in the second 5 years required to "balance" that by maximising my profits? Am I not allowed? 

 

Do you know how much money each of these corporates make, what the actual profit margins are? What is acceptable to you? Why do YOU get to decide over anyone else?

 

I understand what you are saying, but I really don't understand how it can be realistic?

 

 

What exclusive regional rights gives is an effective monopoly. Generally speaking we don't allow monopolies because they are bad for our economy - they inhibit innovation, the supply inferior products or services at inflated prices. This is good for the (right holding) business, but bad for consumers. Not quite sure why/how content escapes anti-competition laws. 

 

 

 

 

Something I have often thought about.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1598235 25-Jul-2016 14:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

ajobbins:

 

Not quite sure why/how content escapes anti-competition laws. 

 

 

Something I have often thought about.

 

 

 

 

Probably comes does to the fact that Sky itself isn't necessarily anti-competitive - you can compete with Sky in theory (including bidding for rights). In the past that was really hard. Setting up and maintaining transmission and distribution networks was insanely expensive. These days this isn't true, and it has brought the issue of the monopolistic content distribution to the forefront. 

 

Content isn't a scarce good - it is artificially made scarce on the supply side to maximise profit. Guess you can't do much about that, especially when the rights holder is overseas.

 

Maybe our competition laws need an update to somehow try and prevent artificial scarcity when supply is effectively infinite.





Twitter: ajobbins


6192 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2904

Subscriber

  Reply # 1598238 25-Jul-2016 14:55
Send private message

 

 

Damn. I keep losing what I have written. The wind is playing hell with our power. I have used up my train of thought and will have to come back to this later. I am not abandoning the discussion but I just can’t continue right now.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


11523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5243

Trusted

  Reply # 1598246 25-Jul-2016 15:10
2 people support this post
Send private message

ajobbins:

 

MikeB4:

 

ajobbins:

 

Not quite sure why/how content escapes anti-competition laws. 

 

 

Something I have often thought about.

 

 

 

 

Probably comes does to the fact that Sky itself isn't necessarily anti-competitive - you can compete with Sky in theory (including bidding for rights). In the past that was really hard. Setting up and maintaining transmission and distribution networks was insanely expensive. These days this isn't true, and it has brought the issue of the monopolistic content distribution to the forefront. 

 

Content isn't a scarce good - it is artificially made scarce on the supply side to maximise profit. Guess you can't do much about that, especially when the rights holder is overseas.

 

Maybe our competition laws need an update to somehow try and prevent artificial scarcity when supply is effectively infinite.

 

 

 

 

Unfortunately there is no scarcity in the supply of garbage, just look at Media works new channel Bravo.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


15331 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4046

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1598250 25-Jul-2016 15:16
2 people support this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

 

 

Damn. I keep losing what I have written. The wind is playing hell with our power. I have used up my train of thought and will have to come back to this later. I am not abandoning the discussion but I just can’t continue right now.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe you should take it as a sign ;)


11523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5243

Trusted

  Reply # 1598254 25-Jul-2016 15:19
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

 

 

Damn. I keep losing what I have written. The wind is playing hell with our power. I have used up my train of thought and will have to come back to this later. I am not abandoning the discussion but I just can’t continue right now.

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you are using word or notepad or such like to compose do a save as straight way and save on a regular basis this will mitigate the loss.

 

 

 

Or type shorter posts tongue-out





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


6192 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2904

Subscriber

  Reply # 1598283 25-Jul-2016 15:50
Send private message

Both good suggestions. I just ran into a bad chain of coincidences.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


10534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1746

Trusted

  Reply # 1598327 25-Jul-2016 16:47
Send private message

ajobbins:

 

MikeB4:

 

ajobbins:

 

Not quite sure why/how content escapes anti-competition laws. 

 

 

Something I have often thought about.

 

 

 

 

Probably comes does to the fact that Sky itself isn't necessarily anti-competitive - you can compete with Sky in theory (including bidding for rights). In the past that was really hard. Setting up and maintaining transmission and distribution networks was insanely expensive. These days this isn't true, and it has brought the issue of the monopolistic content distribution to the forefront. 

 

Content isn't a scarce good - it is artificially made scarce on the supply side to maximise profit. Guess you can't do much about that, especially when the rights holder is overseas.

 

Maybe our competition laws need an update to somehow try and prevent artificial scarcity when supply is effectively infinite.

 

 

I feel the monopoly word gets over used. Sky never had a monopoly. They werent/arent the only TV network in town. There are shows that TV1 has but Sky doesnt, same thing. Would TVNZ/MW buy the latest and greatest sports? No, or yes if they made it PPV to pay the high costs.

 

Content is not a good. It could well be. Yes, it must be. But you cant compare a book that you can post around the world with content. They might not sell a book here, cos its just not worth it. Content differs. They may sell the content to someone here, either to be viewed now (there it is, go and pay Sky or LB, or QF for it, but thats also a no way) Or it could be viewed in weeks or months, perhaps its too near another similar content of the same provider or another.   Maybe you could split the diff and pay for NFNZ and NF US, that way you CAN say you paid for it. 

 

Maybe NF can remove geoblocking and just double the price, thats another 3 coffees every 30 days, then the world will end.

 

 


2557 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 571

Trusted

  Reply # 1598335 25-Jul-2016 16:55
5 people support this post
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

Maybe NF can remove geoblocking and just double the price, thats another 3 coffees every 30 days, then the world will end.

 

 

 

You may jest, but I'd quite happily pay 2x my current Netflix subscription to access to their entire global catalogue.


10534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1746

Trusted

  Reply # 1598359 25-Jul-2016 17:09
One person supports this post
Send private message

dclegg:

 

tdgeek:

 

Maybe NF can remove geoblocking and just double the price, thats another 3 coffees every 30 days, then the world will end.

 

 

 

You may jest, but I'd quite happily pay 2x my current Netflix subscription to access to their entire global catalogue.

 

 

I was quite serious. NF NZ is a smaller catalogue, the rights paid for what we don't yet get (as another provider bought them instead) , can be paid by us.

 

You would have to expect that will happen in time. I assume rights contracts are not annual contracts. The furore over another 2 bucks that they did I find absolutely ridiculous.

 

50c a week? Its already dirt cheap.  


6192 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2904

Subscriber

  Reply # 1598360 25-Jul-2016 17:10
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

I feel the monopoly word gets over used. Sky never had a monopoly. They werent/arent the only TV network in town. There are shows that TV1 has but Sky doesnt, same thing. Would TVNZ/MW buy the latest and greatest sports? No, or yes if they made it PPV to pay the high costs.

 

 

 

 

Monopoly is to some extent a matter of definition. Sky has never had a technical monopoly, but it can certainly be argued that in the past it enjoyed an effective one. If you are the only game in town then you are a monopoly, whether or not that is your intention, whether or not you did anything to bring it about.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


10534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1746

Trusted

  Reply # 1598363 25-Jul-2016 17:17
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

I feel the monopoly word gets over used. Sky never had a monopoly. They werent/arent the only TV network in town. There are shows that TV1 has but Sky doesnt, same thing. Would TVNZ/MW buy the latest and greatest sports? No, or yes if they made it PPV to pay the high costs.

 

 

 

 

Monopoly is to some extent a matter of definition. Sky has never had a technical monopoly, but it can certainly be argued that in the past it enjoyed an effective one. If you are the only game in town then you are a monopoly, whether or not that is your intention, whether or not you did anything to bring it about.

 

 

They have never been the only game in town. 1) As there are already existing TV providers. It started in 1990, there were 3 TV providers here then, and possibly smaller regional ones, although thats later. B) like any network, they buy content. That its pay tv is not relevant, thats merely a funding model. 


11523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5243

Trusted

  Reply # 1598386 25-Jul-2016 17:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

Sky is not a monopoly but they have been allowed to gain a dominant position through inept competition.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


10534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1746

Trusted

  Reply # 1598390 25-Jul-2016 17:28
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Sky is not a monopoly but they have been allowed to gain a dominant position through inept competition.

 

Exactly. Credit to them for having half the market, or they did at some point. I wonder what we would do for sport if they never came here? 

 

Surely PPV sport and that would no doubt be reviled on. Most stuff costs money.


1 | ... | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.