I was curious as to what sky can actually achieve.
They are suing a limited liability company with no cash.
Maybe they can force it to shutdown, only for another company to popup selling the same box.
Somehow the company director needs to face criminal charges, sky are pursuing a civil case right?
It might be like whackamole, pointless ,but more costly.
Line in the sand.
Many here hate Sky, and on this topic many support Sky. If we are to have an equilibrium, we start off sensible and work from there. IMHO
Or do you suggest we let off poor burglars?
I suggested nothing of the sort.
It is not the same as a 'burglary' as the crown would prosecute in front of a jury and prison is a distinct possibility.
Can you then explain how this court case will materially prevent this guy from registering another company for a few bucks and continue doing what he was doing? As I said, I'm curious as to what sky can achieve here.