Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
1222 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 146


  Reply # 1982799 25-Mar-2018 11:47
Send private message quote this post

UHD:

 

It is extortionate because it is a digital stream which is more expensive than renting a new release Blu-ray. A digital file is able to be rented to tens of thousands of people simultaneously where a physical video store has to buy dozens of copies of the Blu-ray to rent to dozens of people simultaneously.

 

The business has massively reduced overheads (even considering the need to pay for commercial CDN and IT infrastructure) but instead of making their product offering more attractive to consumers as a result they continue to try and milk every cent through PPV. It is extortion.

 

 

I think your criticism of StuffPix is unfair in this regard.  You need to level your criticism at the studios that PPV players sign the distribution agreements with.  It would be commercial suicide for StuffPix to offer a flat rate for viewing and have to pay a fee per viewing to the supplying studios.  It would only take 3 new release movies for StuffPix to be eating a loss on something like $10/month for unlimited PPV.  You want new releases on a flat rate?  Isnt that something Neon offers?  And hows that model working out?  

 

Someone like Netflix with deep pockets (sic) could offer new releases on a flat-fee basis but then they'd have to disclose to the studios how many times a movie was watched (unlikely) and could probably drive a better deal on 100 million potential viewers.  But the studios would equally say - if you dont pay the fees we want then you dont get our product.  There are plenty of other PPV operators that have sucked up the terms on offer so why would a studio change its profit maximising formula?


1169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 157


  Reply # 1982859 25-Mar-2018 13:43
Send private message quote this post

@UHD Prices for Pay per View are pretty much controlled by the studios not final seller.

 

Here is web link of Apple battling Studios for UHD to be same price as HD, the Studios wanted it to be $5-$10 more expensive then HD.

 

 

 

Hollywood Studios want higher price UHD

 

 

 

Somehow Apple got the Studios to agree to it's terms, but a smaller company would have no show.


 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software
1222 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 146


  Reply # 1982862 25-Mar-2018 13:49
Send private message quote this post

rugrat:

 

@UHD Prices for Pay per View are pretty much controlled by the studios not final seller.

 

Here is web link of Apple battling Studios for UHD to be same price as HD, the Studios wanted it to be $5-$10 more expensive then HD.

 

 

 

Hollywood Studios want higher price UHD

 

 

 

Somehow Apple got the Studios to agree to it's terms, but a smaller company would have no show.

 

 

Do you know if Apple got the Studios to agree to have UHD at the same price as HD?  Or is Apple just swallowing the cost difference as a differentiator (and loss-leader) and force the other less-capitalised providers to follow or lose market share?


1169 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 157


  Reply # 1982863 25-Mar-2018 14:01
Send private message quote this post

I don't know if Apple reduced their profit margin or the Studio's.

 

If Apple was wearing the loss in margin, the Studio's still seem to care about the final cost to the consumer.


UHD

579 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 261


  Reply # 1983098 25-Mar-2018 23:59
Send private message quote this post

Ultimately, the film studios are only able to charge what retailers and in turn consumers are willing to pay. If I am able to attend a cinema screening of a brand new film for $10 in central Wellington with the attendant costs of running a cinema and paying staff then I struggle to see how $6.95 for a digital download is justified. It is lower resolution video and lower quality audio for films which are no longer screening in theatres.

 

I, personally, won't be subscribing as the films are all released after the Blu-ray has been released overseas and I can't imagine the service doing very well in the long term.


3801 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 459

Trusted

  Reply # 1983112 26-Mar-2018 06:48
Send private message quote this post

Yeah but equally go read the go thread on the chap with the 1000s if blue rays and wants to play them round his house (look at ripping etc). Some people can’t be bothered.

Pricing here is similar to a video store, and similar idea, a rental for short time. There’s no digits storage ( ie ripped movies collection), or physical storage (Blu-ray/dvd).

And only those that are really particular on their video and sound quality and have invested a lot of money in a collection will care about the quality aspect.

I hope they do well. I’ll keep and eye out for specials etc. Hope they get digital vault like vudu do, as I don’t think nz has one of those services here. And later on add purchasing. But personally I don’t trust any digital purchase medium since they can just revoke keys. But rentals Im more than happy with.




Previously known as psycik

NextPVR/OpenHAB: 
Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix --> Samsung LA46A650D via HDMI, NextPVR,OpenHAB with Aeotech ZWave Controller
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4, Roku3, Raspberry PI temperature Sensors and Bluetooth LE Sensors,HDHomeRun Dual
Windows 2012 
Host (Plex Server/Crashplan): 2x2TB, 2x3TB, 1x4TB using DriveBender, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Hyper-V Server with 1xW10, 1xW2k8, 2xUbuntu 16.04 LTS, Crashplan, NextPVR channel for Plex,NextPVR Metadata Agent and Scanner for Plex


106 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1985363 29-Mar-2018 12:16
Send private message quote this post

UHD:

 

Ultimately, the film studios are only able to charge what retailers and in turn consumers are willing to pay. If I am able to attend a cinema screening of a brand new film for $10 in central Wellington with the attendant costs of running a cinema and paying staff then I struggle to see how $6.95 for a digital download is justified. It is lower resolution video and lower quality audio for films which are no longer screening in theatres.

 

I, personally, won't be subscribing as the films are all released after the Blu-ray has been released overseas and I can't imagine the service doing very well in the long term.

 

 

You are forgetting - If I want to take my whole family to the cinema that's $40 where we can all sit and watch the Streamed rental for $6.95 so I'm saving $33 there.

 

I do think if someone with a good playback system supporting all common devices came out with $5 for new release I'd be watching new releases that didn't quite make the cut for a trip to the cinema regularly with the Fam.

I watched a preview on Stuffpix though full screen on my work 19" screen and the quality was pretty sub-par - I'd hope the actual movie is better quality than that if I'm going to watch it on my 65" Plasma at home.

(And nobody knock the plasma - Only OLED is competing with quality in my books and I'm not about to run out and buy a 65" OLED TV quite yet. The blacks blow LCD out of the water. Just getting that out of the way now as every time I mention it people say something about Plasma being old tech without knowing what the hell they are talking about)



59 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 1988716 5-Apr-2018 11:58
Send private message quote this post

So has anyone actually tried this...? What I want to know, is how good is the quality? (say, compared to iTunes). Would anyone from Stuff be able to comment on bit rate, compression etc? Is the network good.. any buffering?

 

 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

TCF and Telcos Toughen Up on Scam Callers
Posted 23-Apr-2018 09:39


Amazon launches the International Shopping Experience in the Amazon Shopping App
Posted 19-Apr-2018 08:38


Spark New Zealand and TVNZ to bring coverage of Rugby World Cup 2019
Posted 16-Apr-2018 06:55


How Google can seize Microsoft Office crown
Posted 14-Apr-2018 11:08


How back office transformation drives IRD efficiency
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:15


iPod laws in a smartphone world: will we ever get copyright right?
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:13


Lightbox service using big data and analytics to learn more about customers
Posted 9-Apr-2018 12:11


111 mobile caller location extended to iOS
Posted 6-Apr-2018 13:50


Huawei announces the HUAWEI P20 series
Posted 29-Mar-2018 11:41


Symantec Internet Security Threat Report shows increased endpoint technology risks
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:29


Spark switches on long-range IoT network across New Zealand
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:22


Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18


Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47


Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25


New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.