Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
Lock him up!
10702 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 2120028 5-Nov-2018 10:49
Send private message

allio:

 

The Shield has a lot more grunt than a basic Chromecast so it's quite likely it has much better performance in mirroring mode. But the quality will still never be able to match direct streaming.

 

 

I'm sure that is true but it is useful to define terms when making a statement like that. In our case, there is no discernible difference. We have an older Sony TV, 50 inch, 1080p only. Our broadband is wireless RBI, so we can't stream 4k or anything like that and we couldn't watch it in any case. Much of what we do watch is only SD so in terms of video quality, there is no difference. Buffering, dropped frames and stuttering would certainly make a difference, but we haven't had those kinds of problems so we can't perceive any difference. I have a sense that OP is not concerned with HT quality, just getting a watchable picture to the TV. For that I think screen mirroring would probably be adequate unless trying to render from something that couldn't handle the load. I don't know for certain but sometimes a degree of purism creeps into these kinds of discussions and they become about the 'correct' way of doing something instead of the way that merely works well enough.

 

 

 

 

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


3369 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2120064 5-Nov-2018 11:18
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

I don't know for certain but sometimes a degree of purism creeps into these kinds of discussions and they become about the 'correct' way of doing something instead of the way that merely works well enough.

 

 

Because the latter usually ends in continual posts along the lines of, I do it my own special way by this this and this, totally going against design. That noone else does. And Now this totally unrelated or different aspect of it doesn't work like I want/expect. So why.. and can anyone help to make it.

 

When correct methods are provided. Support and likely solutions are far wider.


 
 
 
 


610 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2120065 5-Nov-2018 11:20
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

In our case, there is no discernible difference. We have an older Sony TV, 50 inch, 1080p only. Our broadband is wireless RBI, so we can't stream 4k or anything like that and we couldn't watch it in any case. Much of what we do watch is only SD so in terms of video quality, there is no difference. Buffering, dropped frames and stuttering would certainly make a difference, but we haven't had those kinds of problems so we can't perceive any difference. I have a sense that OP is not concerned with HT quality, just getting a watchable picture to the TV. For that I think screen mirroring would probably be adequate unless trying to render from something that couldn't handle the load. I don't know for certain but sometimes a degree of purism creeps into these kinds of discussions and they become about the 'correct' way of doing something instead of the way that merely works well enough.

 

 

Fair enough, and it's definitely true that people have different standards for what they find acceptable. My wife will happily watch a whole movie set to the wrong aspect ratio, while I will have jumped through the window five minutes in.

 

However: my experience (using the original Chromecast) was unacceptable performance by I would say almost any measure. The visual quality (still image) is acceptable, perhaps 80% as good as a direct stream, but I'd estimate the framerate as about 50% of the original at best. The sound is noticeably tinnier. On top of that there are frequent judders, skips, and pops/crackles in the audio. If I do anything remotely intensive on the streaming device (a Haswell i7 laptop) the stream instantly breaks up.

 

Perhaps you are having an experience at the very best end of the spectrum, and I'm having one at the very worst end of the spectrum. But this variability is an inherent part of the mirroring technology. It is heavily reliant on the power of both the receiving and sending devices, and on the bandwidth and reliability of your wireless network. Direct streaming will always work predictably well for everyone.

 

If anyone using a more recent version of the basic Chromecast/Chromecast Ultra device could weigh in on how well mirroring works for them, I'd be very interested. I'd certainly consider upgrading for more reliable performance, as there are certain things where mirroring is the only option.




546 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2120106 5-Nov-2018 12:08
Send private message

allio:

 

kiwis:

 

Is there a way to send your PC monitor output through a cat6 cable to a TV?

 

 

Yep!

 

 

Nice, so I'm not actually using my HDMI output but am using my VGA and DVI cables to connect my two monitors. I could, in theory, use this as a third monitor couldn't I and just display my browser on my TV as if it was a monitor?

 

 


628 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 2120111 5-Nov-2018 12:12
Send private message

kiwis:

 

Nice, so I'm not actually using my HDMI output but am using my VGA and DVI cables to connect my two monitors. I could, in theory, use this as a third monitor couldn't I and just display my browser on my TV as if it was a monitor?

 

 

What about audio? AFAIK, you can either send all audio via HDMI or all audio via your current output.




546 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2120120 5-Nov-2018 12:22
Send private message

stinger:

 

kiwis:

 

Nice, so I'm not actually using my HDMI output but am using my VGA and DVI cables to connect my two monitors. I could, in theory, use this as a third monitor couldn't I and just display my browser on my TV as if it was a monitor?

 

 

What about audio? AFAIK, you can either send all audio via HDMI or all audio via your current output.

 

 

Good point, I assumed audio was sent over HDMI but is the same the same for PC graphics cards? I've got an old GTX 750 ti (yes not the best GC but I'm not a gamer). 

 

 


610 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2120155 5-Nov-2018 13:11
Send private message

kiwis:

 

Nice, so I'm not actually using my HDMI output but am using my VGA and DVI cables to connect my two monitors. I could, in theory, use this as a third monitor couldn't I and just display my browser on my TV as if it was a monitor?

 

 

Correct - your TV effectively becomes a third monitor. Your GTX 750 will pass audio over the HDMI.


 
 
 
 


22529 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 2120453 5-Nov-2018 18:49
One person supports this post
Send private message

allio:

 

In my experience, if you are at all sensitive to frame-rate fluctuations or stuttering in videos, you will not be happy with a Chromecast's full-screen video performance in "screen mirroring" mode (the only mode that will work if you are using a PC-based VPN solution to bypass geolocking).

 

I have a first-gen Chromecast so it's possible that things are improved with the newer models, but I very much doubt that they could have improved things that dramatically - it's a fundamental limitation of having to stream/decode/re-encode/re-stream vs just streaming.d quality video on this particular service is important to you, then you should invest in either a router-based VPN solution, or an HDMI cable.

 

 

They havent improved on the new ones. Even the ultra looks like a steaming pile of trash when mirroring a computer to it. I dont know why its so bad when something like steam inhome streaming over the same wifi network seems to deliver a constant frame rate with much less compression artifacts.





Richard rich.ms

610 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2120835 6-Nov-2018 11:56
Send private message

richms:

 

They havent improved on the new ones. Even the ultra looks like a steaming pile of trash when mirroring a computer to it. I dont know why its so bad when something like steam inhome streaming over the same wifi network seems to deliver a constant frame rate with much less compression artifacts.

 

 

Thanks. I'll save my money.


2005 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 2120842 6-Nov-2018 12:12
Send private message

allio:

 

richms:

 

They havent improved on the new ones. Even the ultra looks like a steaming pile of trash when mirroring a computer to it. I dont know why its so bad when something like steam inhome streaming over the same wifi network seems to deliver a constant frame rate with much less compression artifacts.

 

 

Thanks. I'll save my money.

 

 

I was very disappointed when I mirrored to my Chromecast Ultra when I first bought it - thankfully I didn't need that feature. Even cabled from my PC to the Ultra there was a noticeable delay which became more obvious with any audio in the stream. I didn't notice compression artifacts but that was probably because I gave up so quickly.


Lock him up!
10702 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 2120846 6-Nov-2018 12:24
Send private message

I must be lucky with my Shield because I haven't had any of these issues at all. I use mirroring frequently with sites that don't support casting and it always works perfectly. I did have the problems mentioned here with the original Chromecast and I gave it away. I was thinking of getting a new one in view of my improved Shield experience but now I think I won't.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Arlo unveils its first video doorbell
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:27


New Zealand students shortlisted for James Dyson Award
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:18


Norton LifeLock Launches Norton 360
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:11


Microsoft New Zealand Partner Awards results
Posted 18-Oct-2019 10:18


Logitech introduces new Made for Google keyboard and mouse devices
Posted 16-Oct-2019 13:36


MATTR launches to accelerate decentralised identity
Posted 16-Oct-2019 10:28


Vodafone X-Squad powers up for customers
Posted 16-Oct-2019 08:15


D Link ANZ launches EXO Smart Mesh Wi Fi Routers with McAfee protection
Posted 15-Oct-2019 11:31


Major Japanese retailer partners with smart New Zealand technology IMAGR
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:29


Ola pioneers one-time passcode feature to fight rideshare fraud
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:24


Spark Sport new home of NZC matches from 2020
Posted 10-Oct-2019 09:59


Meet Nola, Noel Leeming's new digital employee
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:07


Registrations for Sprout Accelerator open for 2020 season
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:02


Teletrac Navman welcomes AI tech leader Jens Meggers as new President
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:41


Vodafone makes voice of 4G (VoLTE) official
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:36



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.