Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
17000 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3389

Trusted

  # 2272381 9-Jul-2019 13:29
Send private message quote this post

ockel:

 

tdgeek:

 

Well, you gotta start somewhere. How did Sky start off? I saw that somewhere, it wasnt much. A few key sports roll up soon, cricket and rugger. Thsts probably key

 

 

Agreed.  But this is a complete turnaround in strategy.  Going from standing on its own two feet to hoping that RWC subscribers stick around for Spark Sport.  If that was the strategy then it would we would gave seen the Early Bird packages at $90 (same as last minute buyers) but giving 3 or 4 months of Spark Sport for free (Jun to Sept) etc.

 

Spark was all about monetising the RWC tournament.  Now its a "suck it and see".  Except its not management sucking the lemon but shareholders.

 

 

Its an unknown. They had no idea if subscriber demand would be poor, heavy or anywhere in between. I have no idea how anyone could come up with accurate hard targets for this. IMO, its ended up at the lower end. There does need to be more sport though, ideally one sport that one person per household wants.


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2272382 9-Jul-2019 13:33
Send private message quote this post

To retain customers, Spark Sport would have to obtain quite a number of rights, they may well be bidding against 1 or more incumbents with an appetite to retain the rights they own already, and use to generate income, I do wonder what Sparks shareholder appetite for competing heavily in this space, given the expenditure of the rights and the return they get. The stakeholders would have to be on the same page and understand in the medium term they would be losing significantly. Not sure I'd see sign off occuring for this.

 

In my view, to survive in that space, it would have to be at the cost of putting Sky out of business. It's possible, but probably less likely.

 

 


 
 
 
 


602 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 210


  # 2272383 9-Jul-2019 13:34
Send private message quote this post

Here's a bit of a question - what's people honest opinion on fixed wireless connections in urban areas holding up during world cup streaming?

 

I certainly wouldn't put a lot of faith in it being a smooth experience. 


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2272390 9-Jul-2019 13:51
Send private message quote this post

I'd only use it if a better solution was impossible or entirely impractical

 

 


1643 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 279


  # 2272457 9-Jul-2019 16:37
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

ockel:

 

tdgeek:

 

Well, you gotta start somewhere. How did Sky start off? I saw that somewhere, it wasnt much. A few key sports roll up soon, cricket and rugger. Thsts probably key

 

 

Agreed.  But this is a complete turnaround in strategy.  Going from standing on its own two feet to hoping that RWC subscribers stick around for Spark Sport.  If that was the strategy then it would we would gave seen the Early Bird packages at $90 (same as last minute buyers) but giving 3 or 4 months of Spark Sport for free (Jun to Sept) etc.

 

Spark was all about monetising the RWC tournament.  Now its a "suck it and see".  Except its not management sucking the lemon but shareholders.

 

 

Its an unknown. They had no idea if subscriber demand would be poor, heavy or anywhere in between. I have no idea how anyone could come up with accurate hard targets for this. IMO, its ended up at the lower end. There does need to be more sport though, ideally one sport that one person per household wants.

 

 

Yeah, nah.  I recall (but cant find the source) that the head of Spark Sport was happy with the earlybird uptake on the last day of earlybird offer (the day that the site went down for maintenance). And it would be woeful planning if Spark didnt undertake focus group testing to gauge potential uptake at different price points (not hard to make this statistically robust to plan across the population or target sub populations).  It would a trival cost in the scale of dollars spent on rights et al.

 

It doesnt feel like a demand issue (unless things have dropped over significantly over June) but it could be.  It feels like a cost issue.  And bear in mind that the cost of development for different devices/platforms would be sunk in the "Spark Sport platform" box and amortised over the duration of the Sport asset life (ie costs not attributed/allocated to the RWC project).  Instead its more likely that Spark underestimated the cost of carriage/provisioning/delivery of content such that its sufficiently robust not to fail at first blush.  

 

Major cost blowouts before the event?  Poor management/planning if thats the case.


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2272531 9-Jul-2019 17:14
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I am not sure it's a cost issue. Most people I know who were considering it, considered cost to be negligible. I think many people are suspicious that the delivery won't be smooth. Many people seem suspicious of the whole thing. Spark Sport don't have reputation that Netflix does.

 

I know a few people holding off until Spark deliver on the apps that have been promised. 

 

I feel that it would have been smart to say "if you are an early bird, heres an extra month of Spark Sport on us", that way people could have tried the service before the world cup.

 

 


17000 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3389

Trusted

  # 2272545 9-Jul-2019 17:45
Send private message quote this post

ockel:

 

Yeah, nah.  I recall (but cant find the source) that the head of Spark Sport was happy with the earlybird uptake on the last day of earlybird offer (the day that the site went down for maintenance). And it would be woeful planning if Spark didnt undertake focus group testing to gauge potential uptake at different price points (not hard to make this statistically robust to plan across the population or target sub populations).  It would a trival cost in the scale of dollars spent on rights et al.

 

It doesnt feel like a demand issue (unless things have dropped over significantly over June) but it could be.  It feels like a cost issue.  And bear in mind that the cost of development for different devices/platforms would be sunk in the "Spark Sport platform" box and amortised over the duration of the Sport asset life (ie costs not attributed/allocated to the RWC project).  Instead its more likely that Spark underestimated the cost of carriage/provisioning/delivery of content such that its sufficiently robust not to fail at first blush.  

 

Major cost blowouts before the event?  Poor management/planning if thats the case.

 

 

Look, I disagree. We have had solid, robust, reliable Sky till now. While its NEVER been a monopoly, they owned sport. For an upstart to disrupt this there is no way anyone can reliably predict the uptake.


 
 
 
 


1643 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 279


  # 2272616 9-Jul-2019 20:10
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

I am not sure it's a cost issue. Most people I know who were considering it, considered cost to be negligible. I think many people are suspicious that the delivery won't be smooth. Many people seem suspicious of the whole thing. Spark Sport don't have reputation that Netflix does.

 

I know a few people holding off until Spark deliver on the apps that have been promised. 

 

I feel that it would have been smart to say "if you are an early bird, heres an extra month of Spark Sport on us", that way people could have tried the service before the world cup.

 

 

 

 

Not a consumer cost.  Cost for Spark to provide.  The cost of supplying the service - rights+CDN+provisioning+linking+platform etc etc


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2272629 9-Jul-2019 20:38
Send private message quote this post

In my view, the way they handled the wholesale rights (or didn't as the case is), was very Telecom esk and kinda scummy. They could potentially consider lifting their game and hope decent wholesale offerings could boost subscriber numbers.

 

I really hope they don't try and cut costs between now and the RWC and risk delivering a lesser experience. 

 

 

 

 


17000 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3389

Trusted

  # 2274215 10-Jul-2019 18:23
Send private message quote this post

Just a heads up, the ATV4 app is out. Now, I know some don't like Apple or have an ATV4, but it works very well. I have Sky, I like Sky a lot, and while using my iPads or iPhone via Airplay or CCu was fine, the ATV 4 app means that I am at Sky UX. Im happy. Bliss in fact. Remotes matter.


17000 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3389

Trusted

  # 2274221 10-Jul-2019 18:34
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

 

 

I really hope they don't try and cut costs between now and the RWC and risk delivering a lesser experience. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I seriously doubt that. Its Spark making a play for sport. Spark Sport isn't a Summer thing to play with. Jeff Latch has advised publicly that RWC probably wont make money. Its no secret that they are going after rugby and cricket whose contracts end soon. Yes, while I work for Spark Im not involved in SS, and I have placed criticism here and there, what the media have shown is that it's serious. So as regards your post, if anything it would probably be throw money at it to make it succeed. The rest will sort itself out. 


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2274469 11-Jul-2019 10:12
Send private message quote this post

I guess we will wait and see, but given Spark has the rights to what would be considered by most to be the penultimate sporting event in NZ this year, and they aren't going to make money from it, and other companies have said they will be working a lot harder to retain or obtain sporting rights, one has to wonder if Sparks shareholders would have the appetite to throw the money required to be truly competitive in this space. 

 

I was wondering this morning, if there was likely to be heavy price discounting or additional incentives to bring the numbers up (which I'd expect to be perceived poorly by those who did subscribe early), and those who haven't subscribed yet, if they have decided they don't want to watch Rugby with Spark, or are happy to watch it on TV an hour or so delayed. 

 

I'm a big Rugby fan, within reason, whatever the cost, is what it is, I'll likely watch every single match, but most fans wouldn't be interested in a lot of the minnow vs minnow games (though honestly, last RWC, they were some of the best games of the entire tournament). 

 

It's a slight worry that if people aren't going to watch it, whether interest in Rugby in NZ wil take a hit. 

 

I also remain very concerned at how this will operate in bars and pubs, if it's not executed properly, its actually the bars and pubs that will take the hit. Unlike with Sky, having 6 screens showing the same image doesn't require more bandwidth. I am entirely sure what Spark is suggesting to commercial sites to ensure smooth operation, but for many, getting Fibre before the RWC is going to be a huge challenge. 

 

 


1681 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 178

Trusted

  # 2274532 11-Jul-2019 11:15
Send private message quote this post

Won't bars and pubs have to have the feed come into a device which then distributes it?

 

Stream doesn't have sync so the screens will quickly get out of sync with buffering etc.

 

Never mind the cheer from the pub down the road before it happens for you...





CPU: Intel 3770k| RAM: F3-2400C10D-16GTX G.Skill Trident X |MB:  Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H-WB | GFX: GV-N660OC-2GD gv-n660oc-2gd GeForce GTX 660 | Monitor: Qnix 27" 2560x1440

 

 


20458 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2274534 11-Jul-2019 11:17
Send private message quote this post

Well, I am unsure what kind of device they would use to distribute. I use plex at home. If I stream the same video to 2 devices at the same time, they will often end up out of sync. 

 

I guess the way it could work is if they could find something to mirror to the screens, that would likely end up better. Not sure what hardware is being offered for this.

 

 


'That VDSL Cat'
10507 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2527

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  # 2274544 11-Jul-2019 11:28
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

mentalinc:

 

Won't bars and pubs have to have the feed come into a device which then distributes it?

 

Stream doesn't have sync so the screens will quickly get out of sync with buffering etc.

 

Never mind the cheer from the pub down the road before it happens for you...

 

 

my expectation is a bar that has multiple screens would use one stream, and distribute it internally (be that an HDMI splitter, DVB-T muxer etc)

 

 

 

For a bar to say, we have 20 screens, and will buy 20 chrome casts to stream, that would be ugly.. plus then your talking Requiring minimum a 200mbit connection.. and Ethernet to those chromecasts (although they likely wouldnt be ultras so Wifi to provide 200mbit consistent throughput)

 

 





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Huawei's scholarship programme showcases international business to Kiwi undergrads
Posted 22-Jul-2019 17:53


Spark Sport launches across a range of new devices
Posted 22-Jul-2019 13:19


Dunedin selects Telensa to deliver smart street lighting for 15,000 LEDs
Posted 18-Jul-2019 10:21


Sprint announces a connected wallet card with built-in IoT support
Posted 18-Jul-2019 08:36


Educational tool developed at Otago makes international launch
Posted 17-Jul-2019 21:57


Symantec introduces cloud access security solution
Posted 17-Jul-2019 21:48


New Zealand government unveils new digital service to make business easier
Posted 16-Jul-2019 17:35


Scientists unveil image of quantum entanglement
Posted 13-Jul-2019 06:00


Hackers to be challenged at University of Waikato
Posted 12-Jul-2019 21:34


OPPO Reno Z now available in New Zealand
Posted 12-Jul-2019 21:28


Sony introduces WF-1000XM3 wireless headphones with noise cancellation
Posted 8-Jul-2019 16:56


Xero announces new smarter tools, push into the North American market
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:20


New report by Unisys shows New Zealanders want action by social platform companies and police to monitor social media sites
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:09


ASB adds Google Pay option to contactless payments
Posted 19-Jun-2019 17:05


New Zealand PC Market declines on the back of high channel inventory, IDC reports
Posted 18-Jun-2019 17:35



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.