Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


1142 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 748

Trusted
BigPipe

Topic # 157473 2-Dec-2014 13:51
4 people support this post
Send private message

We've just launched out Static IP- Yippee! Get yours for a one-off fee of $45 at bigpipe.co.nz

New Customers


When submitting your order on our website, you will see the option to select and add a Static IP to your plan. You will be billed the $45 on your first invoice.

E
xisting customers

If your currently a Bigpipe customer and want to get a Static IP, please just submit a support ticket here






bigpipe.co.nz
https://www.facebook.com/BigPipeNZ
https://twitter.com/BigPipeNZ


Create new topic
'That VDSL Cat'
8103 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1693

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1187092 2-Dec-2014 13:53
Send private message

Great to see static ips are out now!




#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


4409 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 826

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1187154 2-Dec-2014 15:12
Send private message

Fee of $45?


Oooo oooo ooooo ooooo!





418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 133


  Reply # 1187311 2-Dec-2014 18:39
Send private message

For anyone interested, the IP I have appears to have been assigned to Maxnet previously, and is not listed in and RBLs that matter.

It does fail RBLs which check PTR records, because currently no PTR is assigned. It would be nice if Bigpipe allowed us to set this through the Web interface. I did request this to be set, but they seem to have forgotten. Unfortunately there isn't much you can do about ignorant twats who can't read RFCs, and don't know that HELO validation and blocking mail delivery on such, is strictly prohibited.

21241 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1187329 2-Dec-2014 19:04
Send private message

Blocking email on anything you like it totally allowable, you are not required to accept anything from anybody.

IMO blocking based on failure to set up proper DNS is a sensible second line of defense against things that make it past not being in PBL's




Richard rich.ms

418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 133


  Reply # 1187366 2-Dec-2014 19:29
Send private message

richms: Blocking email on anything you like it totally allowable, you are not required to accept anything from anybody.

IMO blocking based on failure to set up proper DNS is a sensible second line of defense against things that make it past not being in PBL's


Blocking mail delivery based on HELO validation, which includes checking the HELO matches the PTR, is strictly prohibited. Subsequently blocking mail based on that criteria isn't explicitly prohibited (e.g. in spam filtering rules), but many configurations will not allow mail delivery to proceed to that point.  This behaviour also breaks the requirement that mail servers always make an effort to deliver to postmaster.

While a client/server may present a FQDN, it is also entirely acceptable, and explicitly permitted to provide a sensible value instead, usually an address literal. Many servers will block on that, again in violation of the RFC.

Further, a FQDN does not require a PTR record to match any given hostname. This is nonsensical given there is a one to many relationship between A (or AAAA) records and IP addresses, but a one to one relationship between PTR records and IP addresses. So no, proper DNS from the point of view of SMTP, doesn't mandate anything for PTR.

21241 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1187376 2-Dec-2014 19:39
Send private message

"strictly prohibited" is one of those made up things by RFC nerds.

It the recipiants server and up to them to filter and reject as they see fit. Effective ways of blocking things may violate RFC as it is written, but has little to no effect on legitimate email providers ability to send to you as they are set up in general properly.




Richard rich.ms

418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 133


  Reply # 1187377 2-Dec-2014 19:41
Send private message

richms: "strictly prohibited" is one of those made up things by RFC nerds.

It the recipiants server and up to them to filter and reject as they see fit. Effective ways of blocking things may violate RFC as it is written, but has little to no effect on legitimate email providers ability to send to you as they are set up in general properly.


I have thirteen years experience implementing standards compliant software, so yes, I am one of those RFC nerds. I would hardly call it "made up" however, it's written in black and white.

1741 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 587

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1187421 2-Dec-2014 20:30
2 people support this post
Send private message

That was the straw that broke the camels back. Finally succumbed to Big Pipes cheap and compelling offering smile.

340 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 15


  Reply # 1188163 3-Dec-2014 18:23
Send private message

Hi, perhaps slightly off topic but didn't see much point opening a new thread for this. How are your IPv6 plans going? Any chance of it by the end of the year?

(Off topic because I'm not so fussed whether it's a static range you assign. And I do have SixXS for a long time. Actually quite a while ago the traffic graphs suggested I may have been the major contributor during offpeak periods. But would be nice to have ISP native IPv6 particularly since it means I can set it up for everyone with my router easily but I'm never sure if it's a good idea with SixXS now that so many things can use IPv6 including most Google.)

418 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 133


  Reply # 1188168 3-Dec-2014 18:31
Send private message

Nil Einne: Hi, perhaps slightly off topic but didn't see much point opening a new thread for this. How are your IPv6 plans going? Any chance of it by the end of the year? (Off topic because I'm not so fussed whether it's a static range you assign or not. And I do have SixXS for a long time, actually a long time ago the traffic graphs suggested I may have been the major contributor during offpeak periods.)


I doubt we'll see IPv6 by the end of the year, it doesn't seem like a priority.

I'm really only replying to this to make sure BigPipe is aware that we need allocations larger than /64. I've seen many VPS providers who allocate a handful of IPv6 addresses, but they aren't intended to be used that way. A /64 should be considered the minimum allocation on a connection, and realistically a larger address space is needed by many to work nicely with autoconfiguration across multiple subnets (e.g. separate wired, and wireless networks in my case). While I want IPv6, I'd prefer it be done properly, otherwise I'll still be relying on SixXS which won't be around forever.

SixXS has been great. We've used it for >100GB of downloads per month, free. Can't complain about that, but I do wonder how viable it will be to operate, and the standard or performance we should expect, once everyone connecting to the service is on 100Mbs^-1 of faster connections.

1741 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 587

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1191768 8-Dec-2014 19:56
One person supports this post
Send private message

Handle9: That was the straw that broke the camels back. Finally succumbed to Big Pipes cheap and compelling offering smile.


So I got connected today and have got to say I am incredibly impressed. We have mediocre sync rates for central Auckland with about 6Mb. On Netflix, after the 5-6 min of buffering, I was getting 4300kbps at 1920 x 1080 which I have never seen here before. This is a significant and welcome improvement on every other ISP I have been with.

Well done Bigpipe, I am very happy with the move.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.