Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 919192 21-Oct-2013 13:52
Send private message

lxsw20: Mother had a brain tumor misdiagnosed as high blood pressure for 2 years. Luckily a very slow growing non malignant tumor.

The surgeons etc. were absolutely excellent but the initial GP I have lost a bit of faith in. I am very thankful we still have the neurological ward in Dunedin. 


On the basis of the facts provided I can pretty much tell you that every GP in the country would have done the same. Can understand some loss of faith, and maybe there are performance concerns regards that GP, but nothing in the story as told here validates that.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


1332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 152
Inactive user


  Reply # 919206 21-Oct-2013 14:08
Send private message

This has a lot of potential comedic value. :)

 
 
 
 


4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 919207 21-Oct-2013 14:09
Send private message

pctek: So why did the first 3 doctors spend several years ignoring it all until it got almost to the point of kidney failure?


Good question. I think the point is we don't know why things played out that way. Were there medical complexities or other issues that made it difficult to detect? Your assumption is that they are all bad doctors, and presumably you would rate them accordingly, but that may be well removed from the facts.

pctek: Because they don't look, they don't review it they don't pay attention to the blood results. 


Again, assumption. 

pctek: Latest doctor noted the past results had been showing this for ages....
Some doctors are good, some are shocking.


While it is true that the quality of doctors varies, your story doesn't really illustrate that. If you have a patient consult you who has presented multiple times to other doctors and comes to you dissatisfied with the care they have received, that establishes a very different context for that consult. The final doctor is unlikely to be any better/more knowledgeable/more diligent than any of the preceding doctors, they just started their process with the patient at a decidedly different point along the journey. But, instead of trying to understand that there is a more to this than you understand, you are going to rate the doctors up or down in ways that likely bear little relationship to their merit as doctors.

pctek: Here's another:
A friend of mine had a brother, he felt unwell in certain ways, goes to doc. Doc says you're stressed, move away, change jobs etc.

This persists for some time, back and forth, doc  says same things....eventually he does move away. Goes to a new doc, doc looks at notes and prescribes anxiety medication. Argument ensues, nope, he's stressed.

By then he's really unwell and starts going to the hospital too, they look at notes and do nothing further.
He persists and by then he's as sick as a dog, so hospital finally does some tests.

Cancer.
Sorry, too far advanced, nothing can be done.
He dies.


Reading that what I see is that his cancer was hard to diagnose until bad/obvious symptoms/signs had manifested. 




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


2917 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 414

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 919218 21-Oct-2013 14:29
Send private message

NZtechfreak: Something like this *could* be worthwhile, but is a hugely fraught exercise. Struggle to see it really helping patients with selecting doctors.



Of course it won't.  At a hospital, you don't get to select your doctor, so can't really see it helping either.

4649 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 470

Trusted

  Reply # 919220 21-Oct-2013 14:38
Send private message

Kyanar:
NZtechfreak: Something like this *could* be worthwhile, but is a hugely fraught exercise. Struggle to see it really helping patients with selecting doctors.



Of course it won't.  At a hospital, you don't get to select your doctor, so can't really see it helping either.


Yes, in that context it makes even less sense, however others in the thread broadened the discussion to include types of healthcare provision where patients can select their doctor.




Twitter: @nztechfreak
Blogs: HeadphoNZ.org


1621 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 79


  Reply # 919222 21-Oct-2013 14:45
Send private message

I sometimes think I must be a lot younger than I am as having read a lot of the comments on this subject I am no way as jaded and cynical and negative as a lot of the comments.

I may look at a problem differently but simply. I always believe there is a answer for every problem

Problem = Solution

You just have to find the right tool for the job






Is an English Man living in New Zealand. Not a writer, an Observer he says. Graham is a seasoned 'traveler" with his sometimes arrogant, but honest opinion on life. He loves the Internet!.

 

gnfb on trademe travelkit.nz

GNFB Geeks Out on Geekzone

Email Me




16339 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1895

Trusted

  Reply # 919283 21-Oct-2013 16:52
Send private message

i think there are 2 issues here

1) the public want accountability and transparency in their dealings with their doctors

2) the problem is what the public perceives has usually got nothing to do with competency! it is usually one of these
- poor communication on the part of the health professional (top of the list)
- overworked/underfunded/too much to do with too little time/having a bad day
-> for example: the doctor in the hospital has 25 referrals to see in addition to his other duties and in the last 10 hours he has done 85% of the duties (5% of which took up 3 hrs of his time due to hospital systematic failings/inefficiencies) and he has seen 17 of the 25 referrals and rushing to see the other 8 ... even a robot can't do that properly
-> or other ...

this is a democracy so the public can darn well do what they want but they ain't gonna make things any better if the roots of the problems aren't sorted - communication and health system ...

of course there is the odd rotten egg that spoils the party for everyone else :D

PS we should work towards improving the health system - quality feedback in the hands of quality brains could do wonders :D

1165 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195


  Reply # 919990 22-Oct-2013 21:06
Send private message

joker97: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/9304709/Patients-get-to-rank-their-stay-in-hospital

It's good ... only if the hospital gets to rank the patients and their relatives as well


Sigh and thus like restaurants you'll have people complain about a store to head office believing that head office will spend the resource to provide what is required but what really happens is head office blames the store and nothing improves. I can only imagine how demoralising it'll be for staff who work there with limited resources and complainers thinking that magically but giving a hospital a bad review will magically make the government intervene and give the hospital more staffing and resources.

As for accountability - mistakes will happen when doctors or nurses do double shifts because they're short staffed. Last night I had a 6am to midnight shift because the morning manager couldn't come in because she was sick? was I on edge by the 12th hour? sure but I could only imagine what it would be like in a more stressful job doing the same sort of shift.




Laptop: MacBook (Intel Core m7 1.3Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD)

 

Desktop: iMac 5K (i7 4.0GHz, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD)

 

Smartphone: iPhone 6s Plus 128GB

 


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16


Mandatory data breach reporting in Australia
Posted 13-Jun-2017 11:30



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.