Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
452 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 226


  Reply # 2001017 23-Apr-2018 12:20
2 people support this post
Send private message

Can't we sum this whole debate up in three words..."everything in moderation"?


21459 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4362

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2001027 23-Apr-2018 12:30
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Enjoy.

 

 

I will, but I bet it ends up like carls jr, really good to start with and then standards slip no end making it at best mediocre on most visits.





Richard rich.ms

5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 2001053 23-Apr-2018 12:49
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Eat what you like.

 

 

Finally. 





Mike



Glurp
8228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Subscriber

  Reply # 2001062 23-Apr-2018 13:00
Send private message

People here really get prickly when it comes to their junk food. I find that intriguing.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


3710 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2249

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 2001089 23-Apr-2018 13:28
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

People here really get prickly when it comes to their junk food. I find that intriguing.

 

 

 

 

Classic deflection! Although I suspect it's true to a reasonable extent, they also get prickly about assertions that can't or won't be backed up by those making them. I find that more in the broadband space than in junk food arguments, but the principle is the same... If someone makes a claim then they should back it up properly.

 

Cheers - N


5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 2001091 23-Apr-2018 13:32
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

People here really get prickly when it comes to their junk food. I find that intriguing.

 

 

People tend to get prickly about personal indulgences and the prospect of having them banned/taxed because some people in our society lack the self-discipline to indulge safely.





Mike

3710 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2249

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 2001092 23-Apr-2018 13:35
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Rikkitic:

 

People here really get prickly when it comes to their junk food. I find that intriguing.

 

 

People tend to get prickly about personal indulgences and the prospect of having them banned/taxed because some people in our society lack the self-discipline to indulge safely.

 

 

Yeah, that too!

 

N


5222 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1120

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2001115 23-Apr-2018 14:16
One person supports this post
Send private message

Kiwifruta:

 

This is Tex-Mex at its worst. Had it once (taco Bell) in the States, a few days after a visit to a genuine Mexican restaurant in Las Vegas, as different as canned salmon is to fresh salmon.

 

 

Yeah. It's rubbish. 





____________________________________________________
I'm on a high fibre diet. 

 

High fibre diet


5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 2001120 23-Apr-2018 14:23
Send private message

Linuxluver:

 

Kiwifruta:

 

This is Tex-Mex at its worst. Had it once (taco Bell) in the States, a few days after a visit to a genuine Mexican restaurant in Las Vegas, as different as canned salmon is to fresh salmon.

 

 

Yeah. It's rubbish. 

 

 

Tex Mex can be terrible.   Both Mexican and Texan food are better. 





Mike

7383 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3860


  Reply # 2001147 23-Apr-2018 15:22
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

People tend to get prickly about personal indulgences and the prospect of having them banned/taxed because some people in our society lack the self-discipline to indulge safely.

 

 

I don't think that's entirely fair - at least in terms of obesity which is what much of the debate is about.

 

I know plenty of self disciplined people who are overweight, I'm aware that "The Diet" and many other weight control measures have an appalling history of failure.

 

Hunger/satiation is a homeostatic process, flawed like some other human homeostasis mechanisms (even breathing), suggesting that the main cause is (lack of) self discipline and overeating is mainly voluntary seems to not be addressing the problem - which has been getting consistently worse.

 

I do believe that fast/convenience/processed food industries have consciously or unconsciously exploited a biological "wiring fault" in human beings in order to sell more and more bad (in excess) food.  There's a non-biological feedback mechanism at work there too, the better that works to sell more bad food - which it will do automatically, the more ubiquitous it becomes, and the more money is being made, and around we go.

 

To put it another way, I'm not overweight, but I don't seem to need any conscious effort, sacrifice, "self-discipline" over eating habits to stay that way.




Glurp
8228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Subscriber

  Reply # 2001217 23-Apr-2018 16:51
Send private message

Talkiet:

 

Classic deflection! Although I suspect it's true to a reasonable extent, they also get prickly about assertions that can't or won't be backed up by those making them. I find that more in the broadband space than in junk food arguments, but the principle is the same... If someone makes a claim then they should back it up properly.

 

Cheers - N

 

 

I did back up my assertions. I just didn't do it well enough. That doesn't make them untrue. I am not a qualified academic researcher and at my age I do not have the energy, patience or concentration to spend days unearthing references. Also not the motivation for a debate here which is going to be of passing interest at best, if I am honest. If people are that determined to prove me wrong, they can have it. But anyone who seriously believes that junk food is not unhealthy, or does not have addictive properties, or does not contribute to excessive weight gain, is fooling themselves. I just wish it was possible to shoot ahead 20 years in time to see how everyone's waistline is doing. Like smoking, the bad effects are not usually immediately apparent. You can often get way with it for a long time before you have to pay the price.

 

I am not trying to be the food police, despite what some may think. People should eat whatever they enjoy. I happen to think that food made with care from quality ingredients is far more enjoyable, and much less damaging, than the assembly line cardboard dross dished up in fast food places, but hey, that's just my opinion. I think the wall to wall tacky kiddie coloured instant oral gratification places lining both sides of the main streets into town are a depressing blight on the landscape. I think people are manipulated by unrestrained advertising but that is just what I think. I'm not about to go looking for references to back it up. It will forever remain my uninformed, unenlightened, sourpuss opinion.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


5109 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2077


  Reply # 2001389 24-Apr-2018 09:17
Send private message

Fred99:

 

MikeAqua:

 

People tend to get prickly about personal indulgences and the prospect of having them banned/taxed because some people in our society lack the self-discipline to indulge safely.

 

 

I don't think that's entirely fair - at least in terms of obesity which is what much of the debate is about.

 

I know plenty of self disciplined people who are overweight, I'm aware that "The Diet" and many other weight control measures have an appalling history of failure.

 

Hunger/satiation is a homeostatic process, flawed like some other human homeostasis mechanisms (even breathing), suggesting that the main cause is (lack of) self discipline and overeating is mainly voluntary seems to not be addressing the problem - which has been getting consistently worse.

 

I do believe that fast/convenience/processed food industries have consciously or unconsciously exploited a biological "wiring fault" in human beings in order to sell more and more bad (in excess) food.  There's a non-biological feedback mechanism at work there too, the better that works to sell more bad food - which it will do automatically, the more ubiquitous it becomes, and the more money is being made, and around we go.

 

To put it another way, I'm not overweight, but I don't seem to need any conscious effort, sacrifice, "self-discipline" over eating habits to stay that way.

 

 

There are people with medical conditions who gain weight in a way that is beyond their control.  I should have specifically exclude them from my comments. Apologies.

 

I agree it's easier for some people than others, but each person has to find and stick to what works for them.  Put it this way: I'm the most fallible person I know and I gain weight easily.  If I can turn things around ...

 

The rest of us are the masters of our own destiny.  It's about self-regulation and for kids about parental responsibility.

 

I agree 100% that it's not about 'dieting'.  A diet is a temporary change.  What is needed is to change what we think of as normal food.   That's where the discipline is required.  It's mind over body - until your body and your micro-biota adjust.

 

It's pointless blaming businesses.  Where they set up shop and what they sell follows consumer demand.





Mike



Glurp
8228 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3787

Subscriber

  Reply # 2001444 24-Apr-2018 10:45
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

There are people with medical conditions who gain weight in a way that is beyond their control.  I should have specifically exclude them from my comments. Apologies.

 

I agree it's easier for some people than others, but each person has to find and stick to what works for them.  Put it this way: I'm the most fallible person I know and I gain weight easily.  If I can turn things around ...

 

The rest of us are the masters of our own destiny.  It's about self-regulation and for kids about parental responsibility.

 

I agree 100% that it's not about 'dieting'.  A diet is a temporary change.  What is needed is to change what we think of as normal food.   That's where the discipline is required.  It's mind over body - until your body and your micro-biota adjust.

 

It's pointless blaming businesses.  Where they set up shop and what they sell follows consumer demand.

 

 

I almost, but not quite, agree with you on this. I believe a lot of consumer demand is created by unscrupulous advertising. Without it people would still eat fast food, but they would eat a lot less and they would do it for more of the right reasons (occasional treat, convenience when really necessary, fallback for unexpected circumstances). 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1390 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 583


  Reply # 2001449 24-Apr-2018 10:52
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

It's pointless blaming businesses.  Where they set up shop and what they sell follows consumer demand.

 

 

Its pointless blaming payday loans companies for charging 400% interest and truck-shops for turning up just before benefit day and selling stuff at a 500% markup. they only follow the consumer demand.

 

Its pointless blaming the meth labs and tinny houses, where they set up shop and what they sell follows consumer demand.

 

Its pointless blaming the contract killers and hit-men, they are only following consumer demand.

 

 

 

There are reasons that certain activities are considered unethical and/or illegal. There's not a bright line between all-good and definitely-bad.


2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001458 24-Apr-2018 11:01
2 people support this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

People here really get prickly when it comes to their junk food. I find that intriguing.

 

 

People like myself are not prickly about "our" junk food because I don't personally eat it (aside from about once in a blue moon, followed by instant "why did I do that" regret!). What I am personally prickly about is people presuming upon themselves to lord it over others by dictating to them what they can eat by either banning or taxing the "unapproved" items.

 

Educate and then let people decide for themselves. 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.