![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You can never have enough Volvos!
Sidestep:
It was already entered in the system as a fail. And the vehicle would have had to be towed. It was more time efficient to crimp up a cable (and remove it again afterwards)...
IlDuce: My most pedantic fail - rego label holder (was older double sized one one half label, other half AA information.
Stupidest thing wrong resulting in pass - brand new motorcycle with speedo/tacho cables transposed... would have been reading 30-50kmh idling!
Most dangerous thing resulting in pass - another brand new motorcycle, again assembled wrong, front wheel spacers transposed, caused disc to be hard up metal to metal along full length of caliper. Was told its an easy mistake to make (and also to miss in WOF test!), so now I got a 2014 bike with nasty disc/pads and caliper with 2 different colours.
Bung:Sidestep:
It was already entered in the system as a fail. And the vehicle would have had to be towed. It was more time efficient to crimp up a cable (and remove it again afterwards)...
Are you definitely talking about a cable rather than a hydraulic brake hose? Some of your terminology "2 piece" could refer to types of after market brake hoses that aren't approved.
Sidestep:Bung:Sidestep:
It was already entered in the system as a fail. And the vehicle would have had to be towed. It was more time efficient to crimp up a cable (and remove it again afterwards)...
Are you definitely talking about a cable rather than a hydraulic brake hose? Some of your terminology "2 piece" could refer to types of after market brake hoses that aren't approved.
Brake cable. He failed it because it was 2 piece, with an adjustment plate between the two.. just like any one of the millions of vehicles manufactured that way.
blakamin:Sidestep:Bung:Sidestep:
It was already entered in the system as a fail. And the vehicle would have had to be towed. It was more time efficient to crimp up a cable (and remove it again afterwards)...
Are you definitely talking about a cable rather than a hydraulic brake hose? Some of your terminology "2 piece" could refer to types of after market brake hoses that aren't approved.
Brake cable. He failed it because it was 2 piece, with an adjustment plate between the two.. just like any one of the millions of vehicles manufactured that way.
ie: Anything in the 70's, 80's and any pick-up ever made?
Sidestep:blakamin:Sidestep:Bung:Sidestep:
It was already entered in the system as a fail. And the vehicle would have had to be towed. It was more time efficient to crimp up a cable (and remove it again afterwards)...
Are you definitely talking about a cable rather than a hydraulic brake hose? Some of your terminology "2 piece" could refer to types of after market brake hoses that aren't approved.
Brake cable. He failed it because it was 2 piece, with an adjustment plate between the two.. just like any one of the millions of vehicles manufactured that way.
ie: Anything in the 70's, 80's and any pick-up ever made?
Yes it was an American pickup. Millions of them made like that.
Sidestep:Yes it was an American pickup. Millions of them made like that.
Bung:Sidestep:Yes it was an American pickup. Millions of them made like that.
So rather than "2 piece cable" it was a very standard 1 cable to each side with a balance bar?
Sidestep:Bung:Sidestep:Yes it was an American pickup. Millions of them made like that.
So rather than "2 piece cable" it was a very standard 1 cable to each side with a balance bar?
Like most US pickups the cable between the park brake assy and the equalizer plate is 2 piece, with an adjustment plate/tensioner in the middle.
In typical american fashion the rear or "intermediate" cable part comes in different lengths to allow different wheelbases with a minimum of different parts.
The WOF guy didn't like this.
I took the 2 pieces down the road to a place that made me a 1 piece nonadjustable cable which I popped under the truck and installed.
I never made the mistake of going there again.
Sidestep: I' ve lived in several places in Australia, the US and Canada where all that's required is an inspection at initial registration - and then never again.
Relying on police to spot unroadworthy vehicles, and drivers to maintain them properly seems a bit hit or miss. All those places, however, require the driver to carry liability insurance. The theory being that with the driver liable for damages caused by an unroadworthy vehicle the risk is transferred to them..
blakamin: QLD & Victoria require a roadworthy every time a vehicle changes owner. And they're waaaay more intense than a WoF.
But South Aussie requires nothing if it's still registered.. That's the reason I've replaced all the suspension in my BMW E32 (Adelaide). Was dodgy as all f%^* when I bought it.
Mike
Sidestep:
4 years in QLD where I once had a ute fail a roadworthy for having 'cracks' in the leather of the driver's seat...
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |