![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
mattwnz: As per what several others have said, I believe you have to give way to them, as they are coming in from your right side.
Bung: There is no give way to the right in this situation. Imagine if tbere was a continuous stream of traffic in that lane, give way to the right would force the left merging lane to stop moving.
mattwnz: As per what several others have said, I believe you have to give way to them, as they are coming in from your right side. That is the way I have always understood it from 20 years of driving. We have quite a few of those stupid dangerous merge situations in the Wellington region, but I always make sure I give way to the traffic coming in from the right.
Matthew
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
mdooher:mattwnz: As per what several others have said, I believe you have to give way to them, as they are coming in from your right side. That is the way I have always understood it from 20 years of driving. We have quite a few of those stupid dangerous merge situations in the Wellington region, but I always make sure I give way to the traffic coming in from the right.
I disagree, once the two lanes ran out the Toyota was passing and therefore must give way.
Even it you look at it the other way the Toyota is turning (ok gently) onto another road. The first part of the give way rule is "If turning give way to traffic not turning..."
So the Toyota is at fault.
Bung: In this merging lanes situation I don't think either lane has priority it depends on vehicle position. I suggest that JarleB should have seen the Toyota AHEAD of him and slowed down a little.
Edit. The White line on the left doesn't count as much as the absence of any line across the end of the merging lane.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |