Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13
3355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1775

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379223 3-Sep-2015 15:47
5 people support this post
Send private message

Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N

209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379226 3-Sep-2015 15:49
Send private message

groynk: I thought 1.5m was already the rule.
Is it that there a difference between 'road code rule' and 'Law'?
Without further info, I interpret this as a reduction of the buffer for lower speed limit roads.

Could maybe 'enforce' it with some sort of lightweight clip-on pole sticking out with a flag or marker on the end? :P


OK I looked up the road code and see that it's not actually in there.
I must have seen it in other countries awareness campaigns often enough to think that it was actually in place in NZ!


 
 
 
 


209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379231 3-Sep-2015 15:56
Send private message

Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)



3135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1165


  Reply # 1379233 3-Sep-2015 15:58
Send private message

Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


frankv:
I think that we've been saving money for years by not widening roads and not creating cycle lanes at the risk of cyclists' safety. Now that cyclist safety is rightly put at the forefront, this work will get done.




Mike

2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1379235 3-Sep-2015 15:59
Send private message

MikeAqua: Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


On a road bike, if you even look at the pavement funny while at an angle you end up on your arse.

you are attached to the ground with about 6cm square

3355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1775

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379238 3-Sep-2015 16:01
3 people support this post
Send private message

groynk:
Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)


Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N

209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379240 3-Sep-2015 16:03
Send private message

Talkiet:
groynk:
Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)


Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N


Perspective in this case.
Bonus: Exercise, stress relief.



3135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1165


  Reply # 1379243 3-Sep-2015 16:06
Send private message

It would be helpful to make cyclists identifiable and seen to be accountable, but a bit of nightmare to implement.

Although think of the increase in red light camera revenue ...




Mike

3355 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1775

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379247 3-Sep-2015 16:11
6 people support this post
Send private message

groynk:
Talkiet: [snip]
Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N


Perspective in this case.
Bonus: Exercise, stress relief.


Started it as a joke but now a serious reply...

I'm not prepared to gain the perspective of a cyclist because in my opinion it presents an unacceptably high risk to cycle in city traffic. I know there are many benefits but I don't want or need them personally.

My main road car is a ncie modern safe car with many many airbags and VDC/ABS/TLA whatever... I also race a car and when I do I take all suitable safety precautions... it's on a track, with a cage, fire suit, helmet, 5 pt harness etc.

Many people love cycling for many varied and valid reasons. I'm not one of those people and I get very frustrated by the idiot cyclists (not I am not saying all cyclists are idiots - I am saying cyclists that are idiots frustrate me) getting away with running red lights and changing lanes without indicating etc. If I ran red lights in a car I'd get a ticket because I am by law identifiable and traceable.

Cheers - N


959 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 476

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1379248 3-Sep-2015 16:12
2 people support this post
Send private message

frankv:
wasabi2k: 

Particularly if there are cars parked on the side of the road - a 1m buffer would put you on the other side of the median.



So??? In this case the car driver would wait until there was a gap in the opposing traffic before overtaking the cycle. I don't see the difficulty. .




If a car driver did this they would be ticketed for impeding the flow of traffic, or inconsiderate driving. If a cyclist does it we are supposed to congratulate them for  having one less car on the road




Matthew


792 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 77


  Reply # 1379251 3-Sep-2015 16:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

ajobbins: 1-1.5m will be challenging is some places, and may cause traffic to build up behind slower cyclists where cars don't have an opportunity to pass. Unless the cyclist is doing the speed of traffic, they should also always ride single file.  


I certainly agree with this.

1692 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Subscriber

  Reply # 1379252 3-Sep-2015 16:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

My real issue is not about the safety aspect of what is proposed. 

My issue is around the fact that cars are expected to share the road with smaller, lighter, harder to see, and MUCH SLOWER road users, whilst all of the onus is on the faster, bigger, heavier and more dangerous road users to act in a certain way. 

I agree that cyclists using the road should be bound by the road rules, or be allowed on footpaths. 

If a car is doing 15km/h in a 50km/h zone, the driver can be fined for driving too slowly and obstructing other road users. Does this apply to cyclists? Or Motor Scooter riders? Or Skateboarders? 

We need a shake-up, but I don't think this is the way. 




Handsome Dan Has Spoken.

959 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 476

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1379253 3-Sep-2015 16:17
6 people support this post
Send private message

wasabi2k:
MikeAqua: Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


On a road bike, if you even look at the pavement funny while at an angle you end up on your arse.

you are attached to the ground with about 6cm square


If your bike is so badly designed that it cannot be used on a standard cycle lane or road...then it should be removed from said road and pink stickered




Matthew


17456 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1379271 3-Sep-2015 16:41
Send private message

I am told by Europeans that their greatest nightmare is hitting a cyclist. The ramifications are indescribable. The laws there are heavily weighed towards cyclists. But so are their infrastructure, surely?

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28


Vodafone says Internet of Things (IoT) crucial for digital transformation
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:06


Police and Facebook launch AMBER Alerts system in NZ
Posted 9-Nov-2017 10:49


Amazon debuts Fire TV Stick Basic Edition in over 100 new countries
Posted 8-Nov-2017 05:34


Vodafone VoIP transition to start this month
Posted 7-Nov-2017 12:33


Spark enhances IoT network capability
Posted 7-Nov-2017 11:33


Vocus NZ sale and broadband competition
Posted 6-Nov-2017 14:36


Hawaiki reaches key milestone in landmark deep-sea fibre project
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:53


Countdown launches new proximity online shopping app
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:50


Nokia 3310 to be available through Spark New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:31


Nest launches in New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2017 12:31


Active wholesale as Chorus tackles wireless challenge
Posted 3-Nov-2017 10:55



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.