Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13
3405 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379223 3-Sep-2015 15:47
5 people support this post
Send private message

Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N

209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379226 3-Sep-2015 15:49
Send private message

groynk: I thought 1.5m was already the rule.
Is it that there a difference between 'road code rule' and 'Law'?
Without further info, I interpret this as a reduction of the buffer for lower speed limit roads.

Could maybe 'enforce' it with some sort of lightweight clip-on pole sticking out with a flag or marker on the end? :P


OK I looked up the road code and see that it's not actually in there.
I must have seen it in other countries awareness campaigns often enough to think that it was actually in place in NZ!


 
 
 
 


209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379231 3-Sep-2015 15:56
Send private message

Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)



3333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1251


  Reply # 1379233 3-Sep-2015 15:58
Send private message

Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


frankv:
I think that we've been saving money for years by not widening roads and not creating cycle lanes at the risk of cyclists' safety. Now that cyclist safety is rightly put at the forefront, this work will get done.




Mike

2090 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848


  Reply # 1379235 3-Sep-2015 15:59
Send private message

MikeAqua: Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


On a road bike, if you even look at the pavement funny while at an angle you end up on your arse.

you are attached to the ground with about 6cm square

3405 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379238 3-Sep-2015 16:01
3 people support this post
Send private message

groynk:
Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)


Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N

209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1379240 3-Sep-2015 16:03
Send private message

Talkiet:
groynk:
Talkiet: Here's my contribution... If cyclists want this, how about an exchange where they become identifiable and accountable for their actions?

That means
- Cycling license
- Registration for bikes so owners can be made responsible if riders can't be identified
- Number plates
- WOF

Etc.

What? That's unfair because of [reasons]? I thought that's what you'd say :-)

Cheers - N


"If cyclists want this..." 
Fight fight fight! :0

There are reasons not to do all those things, but I don't think it would be 'unfair'

You seem to be arguing against points that weren't put forward here.

Try riding a bike :)


Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N


Perspective in this case.
Bonus: Exercise, stress relief.



3333 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1251


  Reply # 1379243 3-Sep-2015 16:06
Send private message

It would be helpful to make cyclists identifiable and seen to be accountable, but a bit of nightmare to implement.

Although think of the increase in red light camera revenue ...




Mike

3405 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1822

Trusted
Spark NZ

  Reply # 1379247 3-Sep-2015 16:11
6 people support this post
Send private message

groynk:
Talkiet: [snip]
Why would I want to do that? It's really dangerous and uncomfortable in the rain or cold. Or wind. Or dark.

Cheers N


Perspective in this case.
Bonus: Exercise, stress relief.


Started it as a joke but now a serious reply...

I'm not prepared to gain the perspective of a cyclist because in my opinion it presents an unacceptably high risk to cycle in city traffic. I know there are many benefits but I don't want or need them personally.

My main road car is a ncie modern safe car with many many airbags and VDC/ABS/TLA whatever... I also race a car and when I do I take all suitable safety precautions... it's on a track, with a cage, fire suit, helmet, 5 pt harness etc.

Many people love cycling for many varied and valid reasons. I'm not one of those people and I get very frustrated by the idiot cyclists (not I am not saying all cyclists are idiots - I am saying cyclists that are idiots frustrate me) getting away with running red lights and changing lanes without indicating etc. If I ran red lights in a car I'd get a ticket because I am by law identifiable and traceable.

Cheers - N


Hmm, what to write...
962 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 479

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1379248 3-Sep-2015 16:12
2 people support this post
Send private message

frankv:
wasabi2k: 

Particularly if there are cars parked on the side of the road - a 1m buffer would put you on the other side of the median.



So??? In this case the car driver would wait until there was a gap in the opposing traffic before overtaking the cycle. I don't see the difficulty. .




If a car driver did this they would be ticketed for impeding the flow of traffic, or inconsiderate driving. If a cyclist does it we are supposed to congratulate them for  having one less car on the road




Matthew


825 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 88


  Reply # 1379251 3-Sep-2015 16:14
2 people support this post
Send private message

ajobbins: 1-1.5m will be challenging is some places, and may cause traffic to build up behind slower cyclists where cars don't have an opportunity to pass. Unless the cyclist is doing the speed of traffic, they should also always ride single file.  


I certainly agree with this.

1715 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 280

Subscriber

  Reply # 1379252 3-Sep-2015 16:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

My real issue is not about the safety aspect of what is proposed. 

My issue is around the fact that cars are expected to share the road with smaller, lighter, harder to see, and MUCH SLOWER road users, whilst all of the onus is on the faster, bigger, heavier and more dangerous road users to act in a certain way. 

I agree that cyclists using the road should be bound by the road rules, or be allowed on footpaths. 

If a car is doing 15km/h in a 50km/h zone, the driver can be fined for driving too slowly and obstructing other road users. Does this apply to cyclists? Or Motor Scooter riders? Or Skateboarders? 

We need a shake-up, but I don't think this is the way. 




Handsome Dan Has Spoken.

Hmm, what to write...
962 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 479

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1379253 3-Sep-2015 16:17
6 people support this post
Send private message

wasabi2k:
MikeAqua: Although sometimes cyclists avoid the cycle lane and ride on the road.

The cycle panel concluded that separate cycle lanes offer significant safety advantages. So perhaps this should be addressed as well.

Reading the panel's report it seems cycle lanes often contain gravel and other debris, which are seen as dangerous.  I guess if you have a super duper road bike with those narrow tyres, it wouldn't take much.


On a road bike, if you even look at the pavement funny while at an angle you end up on your arse.

you are attached to the ground with about 6cm square


If your bike is so badly designed that it cannot be used on a standard cycle lane or road...then it should be removed from said road and pink stickered




Matthew


Mad Scientist
17752 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2181

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1379271 3-Sep-2015 16:41
Send private message

I am told by Europeans that their greatest nightmare is hitting a cyclist. The ramifications are indescribable. The laws there are heavily weighed towards cyclists. But so are their infrastructure, surely?

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ... | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Spark doubles down on wireless broadband
Posted 24-Jan-2018 15:44


New Zealand's IT industry in 2018 and beyond
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:50


Introducing your new workplace headache: Gen Z
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:45


Jucy set to introduce electric campervan fleet
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:41


Hawaiki cable system will be ready for service in June 2018
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:32


New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.