Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
Fully Operational
3343 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1088

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 1421681 5-Nov-2015 13:48
Send private message

DizzyD: I don't think its possible to have redundant power in a vehicle. 


There is already both a battery and an alternator (in the case of internal combustion engines) and critical systems like airbags have capacitors so they can keep working after power is cut long enough to do their job.  There's no reason the CPU, sensors couldn't have a backup power source in case of severe damage or failure in the main power system.

10023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576

Trusted

  Reply # 1421690 5-Nov-2015 14:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

ubergeeknz:
DizzyD: I don't think its possible to have redundant power in a vehicle. 


There is already both a battery and an alternator (in the case of internal combustion engines) and critical systems like airbags have capacitors so they can keep working after power is cut long enough to do their job.  There's no reason the CPU, sensors couldn't have a backup power source in case of severe damage or failure in the main power system.


Seperate LiON battery for redundant sensor pack 1, same for sensor pack 2, all chargeable by solar or motion

 
 
 
 




523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1421699 5-Nov-2015 14:17
Send private message

tdgeek:
ubergeeknz:
DizzyD: I don't think its possible to have redundant power in a vehicle. 


There is already both a battery and an alternator (in the case of internal combustion engines) and critical systems like airbags have capacitors so they can keep working after power is cut long enough to do their job.  There's no reason the CPU, sensors couldn't have a backup power source in case of severe damage or failure in the main power system.


Seperate LiON battery for redundant sensor pack 1, same for sensor pack 2, all chargeable by solar or motion


I suppose the human body is not very redundant. And has no backup solution in place anyway. 

I think we now over analyzing it. As a minimum the system should be able to perform just as well as a human. Nothing more. 

483 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 286

Trusted

  Reply # 1421705 5-Nov-2015 14:25
Send private message

DizzyD: As a minimum the system should be able to perform just as well as a human. Nothing more. 


Lets hope that human is Lewis Hamilton rather than Mr Bean.




523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1421708 5-Nov-2015 14:28
Send private message

roobarb:
DizzyD: As a minimum the system should be able to perform just as well as a human. Nothing more. 


Lets hope that human is Lewis Hamilton rather than Mr Bean.



You a Top Gear fan?


4028 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1607

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1421710 5-Nov-2015 14:35
Send private message

I don't believe hardware failures are the problem. Avoidance and/or mitigation of hardware failure is a solved problem. The problem will be software: it will have bugs. Some of those bugs will be directly responsible for accidents, and they will be fiendishly difficult to nail. Even current drive-by-wire systems are suspected of being the cause of several accidents, and those are far simpler than the kinds of software that will make the driving decisions.

The real problem, though, is security. Safety-critical-system car hacks have already been demonstrated. The response from car-makers is the same as the response from every other software vendor, right up until they have a PR disaster on their hands - "this is theoretical, nobody could really do that in real life, we have ISO 9001 and take all precautions yada yada..." But if you've got 5% of cars on the road with a remotely exploitable vulnerability there's practically no limit to the damage you can do, if you want to.

And since we can't keep the bad guys out of our normal computers - and governments keep trying to pass laws making them less and less secure - then trusting our actual lives to them seems insane. I may not be perfect, but I'm not going to wake up one morning and carry out orders to kill myself, my passengers, and anyone else nearby without even realising it.




iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


483 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 286

Trusted

  Reply # 1421713 5-Nov-2015 14:47
Send private message

Lets hope that human is Rowan Atkinson rather than Mr Bean. :)


17467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1421736 5-Nov-2015 15:40
Send private message

I believe Rowan totalled his million pound McLaren F1

UHD

513 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 216


  Reply # 1421851 5-Nov-2015 17:43
Send private message

All I see changing with a shift to driverless AI is reaction time. Right now, human reaction times to a ball rolling on to the road followed by a five year old are abysmal. We simply can't react fast enough in many cases. That is not the case for driverless cars. They will be able to react in nanoseconds and avoid a much greater number of fatalities.

With appropriately programmed monitoring and avoidance software, an unavoidable crash is a very unlikely circumstance and I believe a mechanism to avoid the accident (swerving if space is available, braking, etc...) coupled with protection of the passengers would be sufficient given that in a similar situation a human driver would almost certainly cause more damage and injury.

There is no ethical issue here, a car will not have to decide who to kill because in every thought experiment I can conceive of a human would cause more damage.

3135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1167


  Reply # 1421858 5-Nov-2015 17:55
2 people support this post
Send private message

An autonomous car should stay on the road.  Leaving the road is too unpredictable.

Autonomous cars could communicate with each other - sharing information on road and traffic conditions, using standard data sentences.  Cars would have standard information from multiple perspective on the road ahead. 

Broadcast alerts about hazards could be possible.  For example if a child rushes between two parked cars toward the road, an alert could be broadcast by those cars. 

Urgent alerts don't even need be networked.  Using an acoustic ping would provide information.  The direction of the ping and the Doppler effect could be used to fix the point of origin.  The frequency might contain info about the type of hazard.





Mike

3135 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1167


  Reply # 1421865 5-Nov-2015 18:13
Send private message

Things an autonomous car may be able do to avoid or minimise a collision: -

 

  • Accelerate (avoidance only);
  • Sound horn and/or squeal tyres to alert a pedestrian;
  • Brake much sooner than a human (remember a modern car can do 100 - 0 in <50m);
  • Deploy parachutes (or some other means of braking without relying on the road surface);
  • Use differential braking to improve deceleration (e.g. 'snakey'), change heading or change orientation of the car;
  • Deploy external airbags (pedestrian impact mitigation);
  • Pretension seat belts;
  • Move headrest forward;
  • Manipulate other in car surfaces;
  • Optimise internal air bag deployment;
  • Open a port to avoid cabin pressurisation (hearing damage risk) when airbags deploy.
  • ?decrease tyre pressure? (more resistance therefore faster deceleration with slightly flatter tyres).






Mike

17467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1421980 5-Nov-2015 21:09
Send private message

Just one thing. Braking performance depends on friction between tyre and road. Maximal tyre surface area in contact with road is needed for optimum braking performance. Manufacturer's recommended tyre pressure achieves that optimum contact patch.

10023 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1576

Trusted

  Reply # 1422029 5-Nov-2015 22:39
Send private message

joker97: Just one thing. Braking performance depends on friction between tyre and road. Maximal tyre surface area in contact with road is needed for optimum braking performance. Manufacturer's recommended tyre pressure achieves that optimum contact patch.


The ideal car will run bald tyres on dry days, aka slicks

17467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2118

Trusted

  Reply # 1422049 5-Nov-2015 23:10
Send private message

Depends on what compound is at the bald patch



523 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 153
Inactive user


  Reply # 1422212 6-Nov-2015 10:10
Send private message

Is there really a market for cars that can drive people to work/home every day? I do like the idea of a car that can drive me home from the pub/kids to school and back etc.. but I don't think I will ever really want to own such a car. 

Personally I like driving. I refuse to own even an automatic. Where is the fun in that. 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28


Vodafone says Internet of Things (IoT) crucial for digital transformation
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:06


Police and Facebook launch AMBER Alerts system in NZ
Posted 9-Nov-2017 10:49


Amazon debuts Fire TV Stick Basic Edition in over 100 new countries
Posted 8-Nov-2017 05:34


Vodafone VoIP transition to start this month
Posted 7-Nov-2017 12:33


Spark enhances IoT network capability
Posted 7-Nov-2017 11:33



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.