Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
17325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2088

Trusted

  Reply # 1435805 27-Nov-2015 09:43
Send private message

MikeB4:
joker97:
MikeB4:
joker97: What kind of car is a Ford Eco Sport Titanium?


An Urban SUV


I've never heard of a Ford Eco.


I did it for you 




Haha I did a google and lo and behold! I had pictured a large version of a Smart ForTwo ... close!

Onward
11292 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5015

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435811 27-Nov-2015 09:48
Send private message

joker97:
MikeB4:
joker97:
MikeB4:
joker97: What kind of car is a Ford Eco Sport Titanium?


An Urban SUV


I've never heard of a Ford Eco.


I did it for you 




Haha I did a google and lo and behold! I had pictured a large version of a Smart ForTwo ... close!


Actually when you see it for real it is a very nice looking car and nice inside. I had a close look at one a few weeks back.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


 
 
 
 


2619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 621


  Reply # 1435839 27-Nov-2015 10:03
Send private message

Oh, but surely that really is a mouth that only its mother can love?

What is it with Ford and their open-mouthed grill on so many of their models? Guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder as many people buy them, but personally I think that grill is even uglier than that on the new Mondeo. I think it's partially a result of this "suving" of small cars means the designers needs to stretch the height, sometimes with some 'interesting' aesthetic results.

As for the Juke? If I was it's mother I'd be tempted to expose it at birth.

OP - have you had a look at the Honda HRV? I saw one in the flesh recently and thought it was pretty good looking. Given it's based on the Jazz one can be sure it'll have a good-sized boot as well as a roomy and efficient interior (including the magic seat set-up). Personally, I'd not consider the CX3 (despite being a Mazda owner myself) and a number of those other small SUVs due to the tiny boots.

Onward
11292 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5015

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435855 27-Nov-2015 10:30
Send private message

jonathan18: Oh, but surely that really is a mouth that only its mother can love?

What is it with Ford and their open-mouthed grill on so many of their models? Guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder as many people buy them, but personally I think that grill is even uglier than that on the new Mondeo. I think it's partially a result of this "suving" of small cars means the designers needs to stretch the height, sometimes with some 'interesting' aesthetic results.

As for the Juke? If I was it's mother I'd be tempted to expose it at birth.

OP - have you had a look at the Honda HRV? I saw one in the flesh recently and thought it was pretty good looking. Given it's based on the Jazz one can be sure it'll have a good-sized boot as well as a roomy and efficient interior (including the magic seat set-up). Personally, I'd not consider the CX3 (despite being a Mazda owner myself) and a number of those other small SUVs due to the tiny boots.


Never buy an SUV if you are looking for large luggage space, the exceptions are Mitsubishi Challenger and like. If you want lots of boot look to a station wagon, if you want space and off road then the Subaru Outback is very good but at a premium price.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 621


  Reply # 1435888 27-Nov-2015 10:52
Send private message

MikeB4:  Never buy an SUV if you are looking for large luggage space, the exceptions are Mitsubishi Challenger and like. If you want lots of boot look to a station wagon, if you want space and off road then the Subaru Outback is very good but at a premium price.


I would say that this really depends on the model, and is also influenced by the contemporary design trends for wagons - given the preference for a lower curved rear, boot capacity in many wagons is nothing like that of the old squared-off Volvo-like designs.

Case in point: my 2013 Mazda 6's boot is 451 litres (2015 version 501) - the Honda HRV is 470 litres. This is the reason I've ended up buying a roof box for holiday crud!

Also, one doesn't need to be looking for 'large' luggage space to find the boots of cars like the CX3 unacceptable. Seriously not much better than a Swift or a Mazda 2; I doubt the CX3 could take a baby stroller, which manages to fit fine in my wife's Jazz. The reality is there are always exceptions to generalisations, and I'd suggest that the Jazz/HRV platform provides one in terms of offering great space for the size of the vehicle, a point that is critical to many people, especially those with kids.




17325 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2088

Trusted

  Reply # 1435891 27-Nov-2015 10:55
Send private message

MikeB4:
jonathan18: Oh, but surely that really is a mouth that only its mother can love?

What is it with Ford and their open-mouthed grill on so many of their models? Guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder as many people buy them, but personally I think that grill is even uglier than that on the new Mondeo. I think it's partially a result of this "suving" of small cars means the designers needs to stretch the height, sometimes with some 'interesting' aesthetic results.

As for the Juke? If I was it's mother I'd be tempted to expose it at birth.

OP - have you had a look at the Honda HRV? I saw one in the flesh recently and thought it was pretty good looking. Given it's based on the Jazz one can be sure it'll have a good-sized boot as well as a roomy and efficient interior (including the magic seat set-up). Personally, I'd not consider the CX3 (despite being a Mazda owner myself) and a number of those other small SUVs due to the tiny boots.


Never buy an SUV if you are looking for large luggage space, the exceptions are Mitsubishi Challenger and like. If you want lots of boot look to a station wagon, if you want space and off road then the Subaru Outback is very good but at a premium price.


The top selling cars in Australia are mostly SUVs. In fact the sole reason for the death of the falcon Commodore and camry are three letters. S. U. V.

But having owned a badly designed suv i completely agree with the statement.

Onward
11292 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5015

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435892 27-Nov-2015 10:56
Send private message

jonathan18:
MikeB4:  Never buy an SUV if you are looking for large luggage space, the exceptions are Mitsubishi Challenger and like. If you want lots of boot look to a station wagon, if you want space and off road then the Subaru Outback is very good but at a premium price.


I would say that this really depends on the model, and is also influenced by the contemporary design trends for wagons - given the preference for a lower curved rear, boot capacity in many wagons is nothing like that of the old squared-off Volvo-like designs.

Case in point: my 2013 Mazda 6's boot is 451 litres (2015 version 501) - the Honda HRV is 470 litres. This is the reason I've ended up buying a roof box for holiday crud!

Also, one doesn't need to be looking for 'large' luggage space to find the boots of cars like the CX3 unacceptable. Seriously not much better than a Swift or a Mazda 2; I doubt the CX3 could take a baby stroller, which manages to fit fine in my wife's Jazz. The reality is there are always exceptions to generalisations, and I'd suggest that the Jazz/HRV platform provides one in terms of offering great space for the size of the vehicle, a point that is critical to many people, especially those with kids.





I have owned a few..

Mitsubishi Challenger
Toyota Land Cruiser
Toyota Prado
Suzuki Grand Vitara
Subaru Outback

All but the Challenger and Outback had poor space in the back. The Challenger was huge especially when all the seats were laid flat, and thats dead flat. 




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Onward
11292 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5015

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435896 27-Nov-2015 11:01
Send private message

joker97: 

The top selling cars in Australia are mostly SUVs. In fact the sole reason for the death of the falcon Commodore and camry are three letters. S. U. V.

But having owned a badly designed suv i completely agree with the statement.


Most of the so called SUV's are just jacked up hatch backs. Which is fine, and they are easy to get into and out, offer great visibility but they generally compromise on ride quality, handling and economy. The later has been address by adding CVT's and dropping 4WD or AWD, 
but adding CVT and going 2WD seams to defeat the purpose of a SUV.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


2619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 621


  Reply # 1435901 27-Nov-2015 11:13
Send private message

MikeB4: Most of the so called SUV's are just jacked up hatch backs. Which is fine, and they are easy to get into and out, offer great visibility but they generally compromise on ride quality, handling and economy. The later has been address by adding CVT's and dropping 4WD or AWD, 
but adding CVT and going 2WD seams to defeat the purpose of a SUV.


I guess the "purpose" for an SUV is changing, or more significantly there are two completely different markets: using the term 'SUV' to cover everything from a 2WD CVT-fitted Ecothingy to a Landcruiser seems somewhat crazy, given they have little in common. People buying into the newer, larger and fastest-growing market of these jacked-up small cars don't generally care about 4WD or a decent gearbox. They purchase an "SUV" for the earlier reasons you mentioned (entry/egress, visibility) and - importantly - because it's trendy.

Totally agree about the compromises in handling etc; personally, I'll be sticking to a 'standard' car as I prefer the way my 6 sticks to the road and corners so well compared to the CX5, which is otherwise very similar. My biggest problem is trying to see over an increasing numbers of cars at intersections! (and scraping on curbs...)

Onward
11292 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5015

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435944 27-Nov-2015 11:43
Send private message

jonathan18:
MikeB4: Most of the so called SUV's are just jacked up hatch backs. Which is fine, and they are easy to get into and out, offer great visibility but they generally compromise on ride quality, handling and economy. The later has been address by adding CVT's and dropping 4WD or AWD, 
but adding CVT and going 2WD seams to defeat the purpose of a SUV.


I guess the "purpose" for an SUV is changing, or more significantly there are two completely different markets: using the term 'SUV' to cover everything from a 2WD CVT-fitted Ecothingy to a Landcruiser seems somewhat crazy, given they have little in common. People buying into the newer, larger and fastest-growing market of these jacked-up small cars don't generally care about 4WD or a decent gearbox. They purchase an "SUV" for the earlier reasons you mentioned (entry/egress, visibility) and - importantly - because it's trendy.

Totally agree about the compromises in handling etc; personally, I'll be sticking to a 'standard' car as I prefer the way my 6 sticks to the road and corners so well compared to the CX5, which is otherwise very similar. My biggest problem is trying to see over an increasing numbers of cars at intersections! (and scraping on curbs...)


A category name change would seem appropriate to say...

SUV for the Urban and xtra Urban vehicles eg CX5 Eco thingies , Vitara
RRV for things like Landcruiser etc  RRV meaning 'Rough Road Vehicle'




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


3702 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 551

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1435965 27-Nov-2015 12:23
Send private message

MikeB4: A category name change would seem appropriate to say...

SUV for the Urban and xtra Urban vehicles eg CX5 Eco thingies , Vitara
RRV for things like Landcruiser etc  RRV meaning 'Rough Road Vehicle'


In my view the terminology is currently misused.

I always understood the term 'SUV' to refer to a proper rugged vehicle - e.g. Land Rover. The watered down versions that most people are buying these days - e.g. CX5, Sportage, etc. - should be referred to as 'crossovers'. They are not SUVs even though many of the manufacturers use that term.

4334 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 806

Trusted

  Reply # 1436002 27-Nov-2015 13:18
Send private message

MikeB4:
jonathan18:
MikeB4: Most of the so called SUV's are just jacked up hatch backs. Which is fine, and they are easy to get into and out, offer great visibility but they generally compromise on ride quality, handling and economy. The later has been address by adding CVT's and dropping 4WD or AWD, 
but adding CVT and going 2WD seams to defeat the purpose of a SUV.


I guess the "purpose" for an SUV is changing, or more significantly there are two completely different markets: using the term 'SUV' to cover everything from a 2WD CVT-fitted Ecothingy to a Landcruiser seems somewhat crazy, given they have little in common. People buying into the newer, larger and fastest-growing market of these jacked-up small cars don't generally care about 4WD or a decent gearbox. They purchase an "SUV" for the earlier reasons you mentioned (entry/egress, visibility) and - importantly - because it's trendy.

Totally agree about the compromises in handling etc; personally, I'll be sticking to a 'standard' car as I prefer the way my 6 sticks to the road and corners so well compared to the CX5, which is otherwise very similar. My biggest problem is trying to see over an increasing numbers of cars at intersections! (and scraping on curbs...)


A category name change would seem appropriate to say...

SUV for the Urban and xtra Urban vehicles eg CX5 Eco thingies , Vitara
RRV for things like Landcruiser etc  RRV meaning 'Rough Road Vehicle'



No it has'nt.

The correct term is CUV and SUV.

Ecosport is crossover utility vehicle. It means car for soccer/rugby mum.

On a serious note, it is too small for fat guys like me. It is the Fiesta on steroid but same seating space.





5016 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2294


  Reply # 1436070 27-Nov-2015 14:36
Send private message

alasta:
MikeB4: A category name change would seem appropriate to say...

SUV for the Urban and xtra Urban vehicles eg CX5 Eco thingies , Vitara
RRV for things like Landcruiser etc  RRV meaning 'Rough Road Vehicle'


In my view the terminology is currently misused.

I always understood the term 'SUV' to refer to a proper rugged vehicle - e.g. Land Rover. The watered down versions that most people are buying these days - e.g. CX5, Sportage, etc. - should be referred to as 'crossovers'. They are not SUVs even though many of the manufacturers use that term.


I'd hardly consider an old-style Landrover a "Sport" Utility Vehicle.  Neither are most "Utes" from an Australasian perspective.
In fact I'd probably just delete "Sport" from the designation of all cars, except those made and used specifically for motorsport.  Oh wait, off-roading is a "motorsport" apparently.
But wait, there's "RV", "Crossover".  Silliest name/designation of all is Mercedes' "Shooting Brake".  What-oh - the Germans shoot pheasants on their English estates?
However, I do want a car that's luxurious but easy to clean, aggressive but refined, small but spacious, rugged but nimble, frugal but powerful, and makes just the right statement about "me" without being ostentatious.  Then the madmen will have sold happiness.

2997 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 409

Subscriber

  Reply # 1436084 27-Nov-2015 14:55
Send private message

Fred99: ............However, I do want a car that's luxurious but easy to clean, aggressive but refined, small but spacious, rugged but nimble, frugal but powerful, and makes just the right statement about "me" without being ostentatious.  Then the madmen will have sold happiness.


I'll take two thanks! But only if I can choose the colour.

Of interest, I looked at a couple of 'demonstrator' vehicles. The (Ford) dealer had them on for only $1000 less than brand new, couldn't take possession until January and god knows who would be driving them in the interim. With targets to be met by year's end, I think I'll wait a bit.

It would appear that the Ecosport and Kuga (and Territory) are sticking with the current grill and not going to the Aston Martin inspired grill on the Fiesta, Focus, Mondeo and Falcon (and Mustang - kind of).




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

2740 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1160


  Reply # 1436157 27-Nov-2015 16:05
Send private message

It's a Ford. That's enough for me to say nope. Had a few, still have one, never again no matter how nice they look.




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vocus New Zealand on the block as Aussies bail
Posted 23-Oct-2017 17:06


Vodafone TV — television in the cloud
Posted 17-Oct-2017 19:29


Nokia 8 review: Classy midrange pure Android phone
Posted 16-Oct-2017 07:27


Why carriers might want to embrace Commerce Commission study, MVNOs
Posted 13-Oct-2017 09:42


Fitbit launches Ionic, its health and fitness smartwatch
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:52


Xero launches machine learning automation to improve coding accuracy for small businesses
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:45


Bank of New Zealand uses Intel AI to detect financial crime
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:39


Sony launches Xperia XZ1, a smartphone with real-time 3D capture
Posted 11-Oct-2017 10:26


Notes on Nokia’s phone comeback
Posted 10-Oct-2017 10:06


Air New Zealand begins Inflight Wi-Fi rollout
Posted 9-Oct-2017 20:16


The latest mobile phones in perspective
Posted 9-Oct-2017 18:34


Review: Acronis True Image 2018 — serious backup
Posted 8-Oct-2017 11:22


Lenovo launches ThinkPad Anniversary Edition 25
Posted 7-Oct-2017 23:16


Less fone, more tech as Vodafone gets brand make-over
Posted 6-Oct-2017 08:16


API Talent Achieves AWS MSP Partner Status
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:20



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.