![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: Can't help wondering what would happen in court if the driver and passenger had each been wearing a mask of the other's face and denied being the one responsible.
Geektastic:Jase2985:Geektastic:Jase2985: how do you issue points via a speed camera If you cant prove who was driving?
my son could be 10 points from being disqualified and I could say it was me driving, there is no proof of that
Easy. The points always go to the car owner unless they can prove someone else was driving.
but how can you prove that? its something that can lead to someone loosing their liscence
guilty until proven innocent, not the way it is suppose to work
It's really simple. Many countries manage to do it and I am sure NZ can do so too.
1) YOU the car owner are responsible for what happens to your car. This includes speeding.
2) The ticket arrives addressed to you. You can fill it is saying "Not me - My wife/son/daughter/neighbour" AND IF YOU LIE YOU COMMIT PERJURY
3) The person you said was driving gets the ticket. They can defend it if they choose and one defence could be "I wasn't driving - he was" in which case the court will decide which of you is a lying toe rag
4) Most modern cameras photograph the driver and passenger. This makes lying a lot harder!
Rikkitic: Can't help wondering what would happen in court if the driver and passenger had each been wearing a mask of the other's face and denied being the one responsible.
Jase2985:paulchinnz:
Anyone know what error is associated with speed cameras e.g. 1%? 5%?
next to nothing at all
"Accuracy better than 1 Kmh for all modes" for the Stalker DSR
https://www.fyi.org.nz/request/speed_measuring_equipment
down the bottom there are some links to manuals and publications
frankv: So you could be fined if you were driving at 102kph.
Bung:Jase2985:paulchinnz:
Anyone know what error is associated with speed cameras e.g. 1%? 5%?
next to nothing at all
"Accuracy better than 1 Kmh for all modes" for the Stalker DSR
https://www.fyi.org.nz/request/speed_measuring_equipment
down the bottom there are some links to manuals and publications
The Police trot out the local ESR?? certification that the Stalker is accurate to 1km/h. The manufacturer's claim is for " +1, -2 mph stationary, ±2 mph moving +2 / –3 km/h stationary, ±3 km/h moving" The difference may be explained in the specs for Stalker's photo unit where the accuracy of the radar section is quoted as 1km/h in LABORATORY conditions and 3km/h in operating conditions.
gzt: What is in the "speed awareness course" option and how does that work in practice?
Geektastic:
Interesting that so many think that the sensible thing to do is to attempt to find ways to outsmart the law instead of just not speeding....
have to take your case to the magistrates.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Geektastic:gzt: What is in the "speed awareness course" option and how does that work in practice?
You can read about that here
In essence a 4 hour course that costs you the same as the penalty (around $225 NZ equivalent) and means you do not get the penalty points.
You still have to disclose the speeding offence to your insurer and it is still likely to increase your annual premium.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |