Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 25

gzt

9268 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1321


  Reply # 1441629 6-Dec-2015 23:07
Send private message

I like to think I could guess from the standard white line spacing...

1888 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 316


  Reply # 1441684 7-Dec-2015 02:57
Send private message

Firstly, I'm pretty sure last year there was a massive media uproar as the Christmas road toll was nearer to double that of the year before that, which brought in to question the campaigns effectiveness.  I also remember the police apologising saying they "could have been more clear" about the campaign.

Secondly, it is quite obviously revenue gathering, and I'm expecting the same result as last year (or the year before, I can't remember) which is more deaths than anticipated.  It will once again be blamed on their stupid campaign and nobody will do anything about it because 100 kilometers per hour is actually a magic safety number that even gods cannot tamper with.

I budget for about 250 dollars in speeding fines over Christmas as a "just in case".  It's funny watching the police officers face when I ask if I can pay in cash!  If you ask them about their day and crack a joke or two they usually let you off anyway.  In my experience, anything 115KM/h and under you can get a warning for.  You might want to hide your detector or switch your jammer off though, haha.





Sometimes what you don't get is a blessing in disguise!

 
 
 
 


11531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5244

Trusted

  Reply # 1441686 7-Dec-2015 06:27
Send private message

joker97:
Zippity: Excuses, excuses.

If you exceed the allowable speed limit, you deserve to receive an infringement notice and the associated fine.

I set the cruise control on my Maxima to 104 and sit back and concentrate on the road ahead :)


Not possible when every other km there is a 65 bend, or when cars are ahead.

Used to be dead easy to tow at one speed when the throttle was a no 8 wire attached to a NA engine coupled to a manual box. Nowadays with electronic throttle control, CVT, turbo ... the bloody pedal is a sponge!


It's easy to stay with in the required limits on modern vehicles.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


11531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5244

Trusted

  Reply # 1441687 7-Dec-2015 06:29
Send private message

DravidDavid: Firstly, I'm pretty sure last year there was a massive media uproar as the Christmas road toll was nearer to double that of the year before that, which brought in to question the campaigns effectiveness.  I also remember the police apologising saying they "could have been more clear" about the campaign.

Secondly, it is quite obviously revenue gathering, and I'm expecting the same result as last year (or the year before, I can't remember) which is more deaths than anticipated.  It will once again be blamed on their stupid campaign and nobody will do anything about it because 100 kilometers per hour is actually a magic safety number that even gods cannot tamper with.

I budget for about 250 dollars in speeding fines over Christmas as a "just in case".  It's funny watching the police officers face when I ask if I can pay in cash!  If you ask them about their day and crack a joke or two they usually let you off anyway.  In my experience, anything 115KM/h and under you can get a warning for.  You might want to hide your detector or switch your jammer off though, haha.


A further measure the Government should take is the banning the importing, selling and use of devices such Radar detectors etc.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Hmm, what to write...
962 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 479

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1441768 7-Dec-2015 09:04
Send private message

MikeB4:
DravidDavid: Firstly, I'm pretty sure last year there was a massive media uproar as the Christmas road toll was nearer to double that of the year before that, which brought in to question the campaigns effectiveness.  I also remember the police apologising saying they "could have been more clear" about the campaign.

Secondly, it is quite obviously revenue gathering, and I'm expecting the same result as last year (or the year before, I can't remember) which is more deaths than anticipated.  It will once again be blamed on their stupid campaign and nobody will do anything about it because 100 kilometers per hour is actually a magic safety number that even gods cannot tamper with.

I budget for about 250 dollars in speeding fines over Christmas as a "just in case".  It's funny watching the police officers face when I ask if I can pay in cash!  If you ask them about their day and crack a joke or two they usually let you off anyway.  In my experience, anything 115KM/h and under you can get a warning for.  You might want to hide your detector or switch your jammer off though, haha.


A further measure the Government should take is the banning the importing, selling and use of devices such Radar detectors etc.


They wont do that. I seem to remember them talking about it 10 years ago. At the time the evidence showed those with radar detectors were less likely to crash. Why? The theory was they relaxed more and that driving was less stressful and so less tiring.

Apparently its not speed that kills...




Matthew


2130 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1027


  Reply # 1441818 7-Dec-2015 09:46
One person supports this post
Send private message

Zippity: Excuses, excuses.

If you exceed the allowable speed limit, you deserve to receive an infringement notice and the associated fine.

I set the cruise control on my Maxima to 104 and sit back and concentrate on the road ahead :)


So, since the allowable speed limit is in fact 100 and not 104, you're saying that *you* deserve fines. I suggest that you be pro-active about this and not wait for cops and tickets, and just send the money in voluntarily.


11531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5244

Trusted

  Reply # 1441819 7-Dec-2015 09:46
Send private message

mdooher:
MikeB4:
DravidDavid: Firstly, I'm pretty sure last year there was a massive media uproar as the Christmas road toll was nearer to double that of the year before that, which brought in to question the campaigns effectiveness.  I also remember the police apologising saying they "could have been more clear" about the campaign.

Secondly, it is quite obviously revenue gathering, and I'm expecting the same result as last year (or the year before, I can't remember) which is more deaths than anticipated.  It will once again be blamed on their stupid campaign and nobody will do anything about it because 100 kilometers per hour is actually a magic safety number that even gods cannot tamper with.

I budget for about 250 dollars in speeding fines over Christmas as a "just in case".  It's funny watching the police officers face when I ask if I can pay in cash!  If you ask them about their day and crack a joke or two they usually let you off anyway.  In my experience, anything 115KM/h and under you can get a warning for.  You might want to hide your detector or switch your jammer off though, haha.


A further measure the Government should take is the banning the importing, selling and use of devices such Radar detectors etc.


They wont do that. I seem to remember them talking about it 10 years ago. At the time the evidence showed those with radar detectors were less likely to crash. Why? The theory was they relaxed more and that driving was less stressful and so less tiring.

Apparently its not speed that kills...


I wonder how many of the folks steamed about VW defeating emissions testing use Radar detectors etc.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Hmm, what to write...
962 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 479

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1441862 7-Dec-2015 10:36
Send private message

MikeB4:
mdooher:
MikeB4:
DravidDavid: Firstly, I'm pretty sure last year there was a massive media uproar as the Christmas road toll was nearer to double that of the year before that, which brought in to question the campaigns effectiveness.  I also remember the police apologising saying they "could have been more clear" about the campaign.

Secondly, it is quite obviously revenue gathering, and I'm expecting the same result as last year (or the year before, I can't remember) which is more deaths than anticipated.  It will once again be blamed on their stupid campaign and nobody will do anything about it because 100 kilometers per hour is actually a magic safety number that even gods cannot tamper with.

I budget for about 250 dollars in speeding fines over Christmas as a "just in case".  It's funny watching the police officers face when I ask if I can pay in cash!  If you ask them about their day and crack a joke or two they usually let you off anyway.  In my experience, anything 115KM/h and under you can get a warning for.  You might want to hide your detector or switch your jammer off though, haha.


A further measure the Government should take is the banning the importing, selling and use of devices such Radar detectors etc.


They wont do that. I seem to remember them talking about it 10 years ago. At the time the evidence showed those with radar detectors were less likely to crash. Why? The theory was they relaxed more and that driving was less stressful and so less tiring.

Apparently its not speed that kills...


I wonder how many of the folks steamed about VW defeating emissions testing use Radar detectors etc.


I would guess none




Matthew


1218 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 511


  Reply # 1441865 7-Dec-2015 10:44
One person supports this post
Send private message

As the comments in this thread descend closer to those in the average Stuff article I figure it's time to put my two bob's worth in.

(1) I personally think a 4kph tolerance is too low but regardless of what I think the law says the limit is 100. I can write to a newspaper, the AA, LTNZ or my MP, and if enough people did those things maybe the 4k tolerance would increase, but until that time the limit is 100 and the tolerance is 4. Even if I was given a ticket for doing 102 I wouldn't complain (I'm not saying I would be happy about it, but I wouldn't try to argue my way out of it) because I would be breaking the law and I don't get to choose what laws I obey and what laws I don't, depending on whether I see personal merit or inconvenience in them. It's up to me to keep my speed within the law and that means 100 or less, not 110 or 104.

(2) New Zealand's roads are shocking. Having lived and driven long distances in a number of countries I am appalled that much of our national highway network is a twisty maze of little passages. Compare driving Auckland to Wellington via SH1 with driving Sydney to Melbourne on the Hume Highway or San Francisco to Los Angeles on I5. There's nothing complicated about their highways - just two lanes each way, as straight as possible, with a bit of land in between to separate you from on-coming traffic. And don't get me started on how many kilometres of road will be down to 70 or less due to road works over the holiday period.

(3) Like @Kyanar I'd like to see Police blitz things other than speed occasionally. They did this in South Australia when I lived there throughout most of the 1990s - one week it might be following too close, the next it might be not indicating, the next it might be not wearing a seatbelt. Evidence suggested people's behaviour changed long term, not just for the week the blitz was on.

Now, how about those cyclists?

11531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5244

Trusted

  Reply # 1441872 7-Dec-2015 10:53
Send private message

andrew027: As the comments in this thread descend closer to those in the average Stuff article I figure it's time to put my two bob's worth in.

(1) I personally think a 4kph tolerance is too low but regardless of what I think the law says the limit is 100. I can write to a newspaper, the AA, LTNZ or my MP, and if enough people did those things maybe the 4k tolerance would increase, but until that time the limit is 100 and the tolerance is 4. Even if I was given a ticket for doing 102 I wouldn't complain (I'm not saying I would be happy about it, but I wouldn't try to argue my way out of it) because I would be breaking the law and I don't get to choose what laws I obey and what laws I don't, depending on whether I see personal merit or inconvenience in them. It's up to me to keep my speed within the law and that means 100 or less, not 110 or 104.

(2) New Zealand's roads are shocking. Having lived and driven long distances in a number of countries I am appalled that much of our national highway network is a twisty maze of little passages. Compare driving Auckland to Wellington via SH1 with driving Sydney to Melbourne on the Hume Highway or San Francisco to Los Angeles on I5. There's nothing complicated about their highways - just two lanes each way, as straight as possible, with a bit of land in between to separate you from on-coming traffic. And don't get me started on how many kilometres of road will be down to 70 or less due to road works over the holiday period.

(3) Like @Kyanar I'd like to see Police blitz things other than speed occasionally. They did this in South Australia when I lived there throughout most of the 1990s - one week it might be following too close, the next it might be not indicating, the next it might be not wearing a seatbelt. Evidence suggested people's behaviour changed long term, not just for the week the blitz was on.

Now, how about those cyclists?


I agree with NZ roads being bad with a big percentage of 100km roads barely safe enough to be 80km roads, however there are some that could be safely greater than 100km.

I would like to see proactive action regarding...
1. Intersection compliance.
2. keeping left unless passing.
3. inconsiderate slow drivers. (that does not mean all slow drivers)
4. use of indicators and driving with fog lights on during fine weather.

Another thing I would like to see is screens on the back of large Semi's that show the road ahead.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


Hmm, what to write...
962 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 479

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1441876 7-Dec-2015 10:58
Send private message

MikeB4:
Another thing I would like to see is screens on the back of large Semi's that show the road ahead.


Did you see that Top Gear episode when they tried to make an invisible truck using large LED screens?




Matthew


11531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5244

Trusted

  Reply # 1441877 7-Dec-2015 11:00
Send private message

mdooher:
MikeB4:
Another thing I would like to see is screens on the back of large Semi's that show the road ahead.


Did you see that Top Gear episode when they tried to make an invisible truck using large LED screens?


Yep,

I saw an attempt by the US Army to do similar




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


IT Professional
1703 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 166

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1441895 7-Dec-2015 11:20
Send private message

andrew027: As the comments in this thread descend closer to those in the average Stuff article I figure it's time to put my two bob's worth in.

(1) I personally think a 4kph tolerance is too low but regardless of what I think the law says the limit is 100. I can write to a newspaper, the AA, LTNZ or my MP, and if enough people did those things maybe the 4k tolerance would increase, but until that time the limit is 100 and the tolerance is 4. Even if I was given a ticket for doing 102 I wouldn't complain (I'm not saying I would be happy about it, but I wouldn't try to argue my way out of it) because I would be breaking the law and I don't get to choose what laws I obey and what laws I don't, depending on whether I see personal merit or inconvenience in them. It's up to me to keep my speed within the law and that means 100 or less, not 110 or 104.

(2) New Zealand's roads are shocking. Having lived and driven long distances in a number of countries I am appalled that much of our national highway network is a twisty maze of little passages. Compare driving Auckland to Wellington via SH1 with driving Sydney to Melbourne on the Hume Highway or San Francisco to Los Angeles on I5. There's nothing complicated about their highways - just two lanes each way, as straight as possible, with a bit of land in between to separate you from on-coming traffic. And don't get me started on how many kilometres of road will be down to 70 or less due to road works over the holiday period.

(3) Like @Kyanar I'd like to see Police blitz things other than speed occasionally. They did this in South Australia when I lived there throughout most of the 1990s - one week it might be following too close, the next it might be not indicating, the next it might be not wearing a seatbelt. Evidence suggested people's behaviour changed long term, not just for the week the blitz was on.

Now, how about those cyclists?



Well said. I agree on all 3 points. I too travel above the speed limit (but only a little) and if I get pinged I know it will be deserved but I won't be happy. I would take speeding campaigns and the police far more seriously if the NZ Police choose to do campaigns on a few other driver behaviour also rather than just speed and booze.

3091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 447

Subscriber

  Reply # 1441950 7-Dec-2015 12:35
One person supports this post
Send private message

This time of year people can't even drive round a shopping mall car park properly, so what hope is there for anything but the simplest roading message to get out there.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

376 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 1441975 7-Dec-2015 13:01
Send private message

 A further measure the Government should take is the banning the importing, selling and use of devices such Radar detectors etc.


They wont do that. I seem to remember them talking about it 10 years ago. At the time the evidence showed those with radar detectors were less likely to crash. Why? The theory was they relaxed more and that driving was less stressful and so less tiring.

Apparently its not speed that kills...

that does ring true when I was driving 900 km round trips every other weekend a few years back

I was fined for doing 111 (no kidding) passing a car before I bought a detector. I didn't get another ticket afterwards, although I rarely drive above 110 (except on the express way), I was more relaxed to drive to the condition rather than checking speedo every few seconds. The cops know the sweet spot that could catch drivers on surprise, i.e. down hills gentle bend, detectors won't give you much headroom in those conditions especially if you drive too fast.

The black spots on SH2? Never saw them.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 25
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.