Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
956 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  # 1484295 3-Feb-2016 12:59
Send private message

Bit of a dumb situation really and one I doubt the insurer will back down on, they'll do whatever it takes to claw any money back.

 

Rather than send letters back and forth just tell them to initiate disputes tribunal proceedings and let a mediator decide the outcome


8873 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484298 3-Feb-2016 13:03
Send private message

Google Maps isn't very clear because it has two different views of that part of the road, one when it was one way and the other when its 2 ways, which I believe it is now.

 

But there are 2 types of bus lane in wellington, "Bus Lane" which can be used by a cyclist and "Bus Only" which cant. They may have time stipulations against them.

 

http://wellington.govt.nz/~/media/services/parking-and-roads/cycling/files/buslanes-use.pdf 


 
 
 
 


1534 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 1484340 3-Feb-2016 13:47
2 people support this post
Send private message

nairda:

 

tchart:

 

 

 

AFAIK the bus lanes down here state "Buses Only" which would exclude any other vehicles including bikes.

 

 

That's not quite 100% correct.  WCC lists a few bus lanes where cyclists are permitted (possibly only at certain times).

 

 

Must be my visual prejudice as I work near Manners street and it is "Bus Only". A quick look on the WCC mapping website and it looks like its 50/50 between "bus only" and "bus lane" across the CBD.

 

But as already pointed out the OP says it was a "bus only" street.

 

Hypothetical situation; if this scenario was car vs pedestrian and the car was damaged (and not the pedestrian), surely it would be the car driver at fault. How is this different if the cyclist allegedly went through a red light into a bus only street.


Mad Scientist
20909 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484347 3-Feb-2016 14:08
Send private message

First question

Did you admit liability at any stage? If yes you have to pay.

If no you must continue to deny liability.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


1076 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1484369 3-Feb-2016 14:22
One person supports this post
Send private message

Reading the original post it kind of looks like the OP admitted liability when he gave the cyclist his details at the scene in case the cyclist had to make a claim. That seems like a very nice but dumb thing to do and now the OP is facing the consequences.






22523 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1484370 3-Feb-2016 14:23
Send private message

If you have an accident you are required to give your details. Otherwise it is a hit and run.





Richard rich.ms

Mad Scientist
20909 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484394 3-Feb-2016 14:34
Send private message

Brumfondl:

Reading the original post it kind of looks like the OP admitted liability when he gave the cyclist his details at the scene in case the cyclist had to make a claim. That seems like a very nice but dumb thing to do and now the OP is facing the consequences.



If it was not recorded or witnessed by another person it's your word against his.

I'd say Google how to write a letter to deny liability with strong arguments and reasons. Photos of the alleged scene helps a lot.

Unfortunately it's you against a corporation but it could work. Good luck. And you don't have contents insurance? If you do your insurer can help defend you.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


 
 
 
 


21299 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484396 3-Feb-2016 14:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

Brumfondl:

 

Reading the original post it kind of looks like the OP admitted liability when he gave the cyclist his details at the scene in case the cyclist had to make a claim. That seems like a very nice but dumb thing to do and now the OP is facing the consequences.

 

 

 

 

Giving details is not admitting liability. You are required by law to give them.

 

You are not required to admit liability.


Mad Scientist
20909 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484398 3-Feb-2016 14:35
Send private message

richms:

If you have an accident you are required to give your details. Otherwise it is a hit and run.



It's not an accident per se.

The other guy wasn't looking and fell off his bike. Simple as that.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


Mad Scientist
20909 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484426 3-Feb-2016 14:36
Send private message

Hmm no edit button???

Anyway it's moot now re exchange info or not.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


21299 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484428 3-Feb-2016 14:46
Send private message

joker97:
richms:

 

If you have an accident you are required to give your details. Otherwise it is a hit and run.

 



It's not an accident per se.

The other guy wasn't looking and fell off his bike. Simple as that.

 

 

 

Disagree.


15162 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1484437 3-Feb-2016 14:58
Send private message

One thing you should do is record the amount of time you spend on it. 

 

What I am surprised about though, is normally insurance companies require this sort of thing is reported to the police before they will accept taking on a claim. I had to when my car was hit by an unsecured load, as that was a mandatory requirement before I could make the claim. If I was in this situation, I think I would ask the insurance company for the police report showing who is at fault, otherwise what proof have they got? I would also tell them that I would be billing for my time, so they are aware that it will cost them if they are in the wrong. That maybe enough for them to say that this is going to be too difficult, and to not pursue it further. But make sure you get that confirmation in writing if it occurs, because these things can come back to haunt you.  

 

But as others have said, seek legal advice.


Lock him up!
10681 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484439 3-Feb-2016 15:02
Send private message

This is the kind of thing everyone will have an (uninformed) opinion on. My own limited experience is that insurance companies will do everything they can to avoid paying a claim. The good ones will stay within the law but they will still try everything possible to avoid paying as a matter of principle. The insurance company trying to shove this cost onto you is just their Standard Operating Procedure. It probably has nothing to do with the other party, except that he submitted a perfectly legitimate claim on his insurance.

 

It is unfortunate that this has become the way of doing business. I agree with those who say you should avoid any admission of even partial liability and let the case go to court if the insurance company won't back off (often they  do when they realise the other part isn't going to cave). I'm not a lawyer but if the cyclist was breaking the law that ought to count for at least something, even if you were also at fault.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


21299 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484442 3-Feb-2016 15:03
Send private message

mattwnz:

 

One thing you should do is record the amount of time you spend on it. 

 

What I am surprised about though, is normally insurance companies require this sort of thing is reported to the police before they will accept taking on a claim. I had to when my car was hit by an unsecured load, as that was a mandatory requirement before I could make the claim. If I was in this situation, I think I would ask the insurance company for the police report showing who is at fault, otherwise what proof have they got? I would also tell them that I would be billing for my time, so they are aware that it will cost them if they are in the wrong. That maybe enough for them to say that this is going to be too difficult, and to not pursue it further. But make sure you get that confirmation in writing if it occurs, because these things can come back to haunt you.  

 

But as others have said, seek legal advice.

 

 

 

 

You say you will charge for time if they are in the wrong, they are then able to do the same. Their time will be worth considerably more than your time, so tread very carefully.


Mad Scientist
20909 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1484444 3-Feb-2016 15:05
Send private message

networkn:

joker97:
richms:


If you have an accident you are required to give your details. Otherwise it is a hit and run.




It's not an accident per se.

The other guy wasn't looking and fell off his bike. Simple as that.


 


Disagree.



Let's look at it from the pedestrian point.
Did he cross the road without looking at all?
No. He didn't see any buses which means he looked.
If he looked and crossed and the bike suddenly appeared and he swerved and fell.
Cyclist wasn't paying attention.

Let's look at it from the cyclist point.
Was he cycling at his own sweet pace and looking ahead at the road I front of him and a maniac bolted across the road and into his bike?
No there was a maniac who was walking slowly across the road and suddenly he didn't know what to do and fell. He wasn't paying attention.

I cycle all the time.




Involuntary autocorrect in operation on mobile device. Apologies in advance.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft New Zealand Partner Awards results
Posted 18-Oct-2019 10:18


Logitech introduces new Made for Google keyboard and mouse devices
Posted 16-Oct-2019 13:36


MATTR launches to accelerate decentralised identity
Posted 16-Oct-2019 10:28


Vodafone X-Squad powers up for customers
Posted 16-Oct-2019 08:15


D Link ANZ launches EXO Smart Mesh Wi Fi Routers with McAfee protection
Posted 15-Oct-2019 11:31


Major Japanese retailer partners with smart New Zealand technology IMAGR
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:29


Ola pioneers one-time passcode feature to fight rideshare fraud
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:24


Spark Sport new home of NZC matches from 2020
Posted 10-Oct-2019 09:59


Meet Nola, Noel Leeming's new digital employee
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:07


Registrations for Sprout Accelerator open for 2020 season
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:02


Teletrac Navman welcomes AI tech leader Jens Meggers as new President
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:41


Vodafone makes voice of 4G (VoLTE) official
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:36


2degrees Reaches Milestone of 100,000 Broadband Customers
Posted 1-Oct-2019 09:17


Nokia 1 Plus available in New Zealand from 2nd October
Posted 30-Sep-2019 17:46


Ola integrates Apple Pay as payment method in New Zealand
Posted 25-Sep-2019 09:51



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.