Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
5376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2201


  # 1730899 6-Mar-2017 13:26
Send private message

Find out who they are and take them to disputes for the excess?





Mike



686 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 129

Subscriber

  # 1730924 6-Mar-2017 13:50
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Find out who they are and take them to disputes for the excess?

 

 

 

 

yeah, fair call. Only problem might be due to the "privacy act" I will be really difficult to find out who the car owner was.

 

Just came off the phone with someone from the Insurance company. THey will request the CCTV footage but also said that if they can't prove who was actually driving (eg Owner says: "I have no idea what happened to my car") then we still have to pay the excess...

 

I think if I hear the sentence: "as per the wording of your policy" one more time, I may punch someone...


 
 
 
 


4133 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1394


  # 1730943 6-Mar-2017 14:16
Send private message

gcorgnet:

 

 

 

Haven't got a quote yet, will take it tomorrow. Police said they had the drivers details and passed them on. Insurance Company has sent the driver a letter. (WTF, a letter!)

 

Police have confirmed that the CCTV should help and that the insurance company could get access to it.

 

Honestly, as a matter or principle, I am not expecting to have to pay one cent (even temporarily) on this one. People who can't drive piss me off, especially the ones who hit my car, so I will put up a fight.

 

 

I wonder how the privacy act affects the CCTV footage. 

 

Probably police can get it, I don't see how the insurance company would be allowed access. Being a minor crime , police may choose not to investigate (ie, don't do their job). 

 

I had an experience where some youths fighting at the shopping center car park jumped in their cars after the fight roared out of their parks  and hit our parked car in doing so.   Despite numerous witnesses to state that we were definitely not at fault, the insurance company said we still had to provide names and addresses of the fighters who hit our car.

 

Especially annoying when the other party does not admit fault when they are clearly at fault. 

 

 


sxz

670 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 169


  # 1730948 6-Mar-2017 14:19
Send private message

gcorgnet:

 

 

 

Now the insurance company is telling us that we must pay the excess ($400 in our case) so that they can recoup their costs. They will then reimburse us if (and only if) the other driver recognises being at fault and signs a document admitting fault.

 

 

This is pretty normal.  It doesn't matter whose fault it was or who did what.  Put simply, you have a contract with your insurer whereby you pay a monthly premium so that they will cover certain repair costs, only if you pay the excess on those repair costs.  Nothing more, nothing less.

 

As a completely separate legal issue - if someone else caused the damage then you may have a right at law to recover that cost that they have caused to you (i.e. they caused you to incur the cost of your excess).  This however has nothing to do with your insurer.  You'll need to prove they caused the loss.

 

As a courtesy insurers will usually work together, and where cops/witnesses are involved loss is often easy to prove, so the other person's insurance often covers your excess.  You need to focus on proving that they caused the issue, see if the cops can assist with that via the CCTV etc.

 

 


111 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  # 1730966 6-Mar-2017 14:49
Send private message

Which is why it's important that that police do their bit and investigate it. If they have the registration of the offending vehicle then they can serve a notice on the registered person for the vehicle to identify who the driver was. The registered person has the duty to identify who was driving or be charged with failing to identify the driver which carries a $20,000 fine.

 

Even if you do get footage of the CCTV the quality is such that you probably won't be able to see who the driver is/was. Hence the reason for police to do there bit as above.

 

 

 

 


5376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2201


  # 1731002 6-Mar-2017 15:24
Send private message

gcorgnet:

 

MikeAqua:

 

Find out who they are and take them to disputes for the excess?

 

 

 

 

yeah, fair call. Only problem might be due to the "privacy act" I will be really difficult to find out who the car owner was.

 

 

 

 

You can get the name and address of the registered owner.  But you will have to apply and provide your details in the application

 

https://transact.nzta.govt.nz/transactions/ReqPersonalInfoAccess/entry





Mike

2585 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 311

Trusted

  # 1733388 8-Mar-2017 23:58
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

I just purchased a Dash Cam due to my current experience with insurance.  

 

 

Unless you have a rear cam, it wouldn't be very helpful in situations like these as it can't see the rear.







686 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 129

Subscriber

  # 1734389 10-Mar-2017 14:25
Send private message

OK, a bit of an update on this.

 

Essentially the insurance company is taking its sweet time, dragging their feed for anything and seemingly only doing anything (like contacting the cops to request the CCTV recording after their first attempt was unanswered) only after we call to tell them to.

 

Being caught between the cops and the insurance in this instance is very frustrating as because of all the privacy BS nobody is telling us anything and nothing is happening.

 

Quote for repair came out at just under ~$1k (with $400 excess) and due to worry about rust, we will obviously repair but really don't feel like being $400 out of pocket for someone else's mistake...

 

Insurance says they haven't heard form the owner after having sent them a letter... And they also say that even though they know what car was involved and who is the owner, as long as they can't pin an actual driver, we'll still be liable for the excess.

 

This is extremely annoying. It should be the insurance's job to do what it take to recover their cost from the other party, as long as it is established that they are at fault.. Right now, it feels like they don't really care (and why would they as either way someone other than them is forking out the $400 excess)

 

Sorry about the rant but feeling very annoyed right know and quite unsure what my next move should be...


Webhead
2232 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 772

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1734413 10-Mar-2017 14:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

sonyxperiageek:

 

Unless you have a rear cam, it wouldn't be very helpful in situations like these as it can't see the rear.

 

 

Very happy with my Blackvue dual camera dashcam.

 

Given that people can drive around without insurance in NZ, I have always thought it was a good investment/insurance.





318 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  # 1736669 15-Mar-2017 09:46

jarledb:

 

Very happy with my Blackvue dual camera dashcam.

 

Given that people can drive around without insurance in NZ, I have always thought it was a good investment/insurance.

 

 

 

 

I've heard that older versions overheated, does the new one overheat at all?

 

It did all sorts of funny over exposuring etc

 

 


5376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2201


  # 1736737 15-Mar-2017 11:44
Send private message

Any reason you can't go after the car owner for the $400 excess via disputes?





Mike



686 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 129

Subscriber

  # 1736763 15-Mar-2017 11:46
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Any reason you can't go after the car owner for the $400 excess via disputes?

 

 

 

 

Hi, the main reason was "I didn't think of it". Someone on this thread suggested that and I will probably do that it it comes to it. But first, I need to get their identity from NZTA :-(


511 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 314


  # 1736779 15-Mar-2017 12:09
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

I just purchased a Dash Cam due to my current experience with insurance.  

 

 

 

 

It doesn't need to be a dashcam - for those thrifty minded you can get Android "Dailyroads Voyager" and install your phone in a cradle, this works just as well!

 

I have 2x dashcams - one front and the other forward.

 

I have this Drivepro 200 looking forward and this looking backwards.


Webhead
2232 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 772

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1739857 15-Mar-2017 14:27
One person supports this post
Send private message

alliao:

 

 

 

 I've heard that older versions overheated, does the new one overheat at all?

 

It did all sorts of funny over exposuring etc

 

 

I have not had any problems with them at all. Could use a little better resolution on the back camera, but other than that I have no complaints.





1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

WLG-X festival to celebrate creativity and innovation
Posted 22-May-2019 17:53


HPE to acquire supercomputing leader Cray
Posted 20-May-2019 11:07


Techweek starting around NZ today
Posted 20-May-2019 09:52


Porirua City Council first to adopt new council software solution Datascape
Posted 15-May-2019 12:00


New survey provides insight into schools' technology challenges and plans
Posted 15-May-2019 09:30


Apple Music now available on Alexa devices in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 15-May-2019 09:11


Make a stand against cyberbullying this Pink Shirt Day
Posted 14-May-2019 20:23


Samsung first TV manufacturer to launch the Apple TV App and Airplay 2
Posted 14-May-2019 20:11


Vodafone New Zealand sold
Posted 14-May-2019 07:25


Kordia boosts cloud performance with locally-hosted Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 10:25


Microsoft Azure ExpressRoute in New Zealand opens up faster, more secure internet for Kiwi businesses
Posted 8-May-2019 09:39


Vocus Communications to deliver Microsoft Azure Cloud Solutions through Azure ExpressRoute
Posted 8-May-2019 09:25


Independent NZ feature film #statusPending to premiere during WLG-X
Posted 6-May-2019 22:13


The ultimate dog photoshoot with Nokia 9 PureView #ForgottenDogsofInstagram
Posted 6-May-2019 09:41


Nokia 9 PureView available in New Zealand
Posted 6-May-2019 09:06



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.