Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
5119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2085


  Reply # 1953429 8-Feb-2018 08:19
4 people support this post
Send private message

That rocket was seriously impressive, especially the reusable boosters landing in synchrony.

 

But if the humanity star was seen as ego driven what do you call putting a car into space?

 

Vulgar display of wealth?

 

And also more space junk.

 

 





Mike

13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1953431 8-Feb-2018 08:24
Send private message

Agreed. Something tasteful. And unlike the Humanity Star, this car will last a billion years, although I guess its unbelieveably unlikely to hit anything of ours or anything else. The contrast in these two threads is startling


992 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159

UberGroup

  Reply # 1953455 8-Feb-2018 08:48
Send private message

I think the primary difference is RocketLab's didn't need more payload, It was an unneeded secondary payload that was kept secret whereas everyone knew and accepted that FH was going to have a big mass simulator and it was going to go quite far out

 

 

 

Edit:// To be fair the ARK was a surprise but it's being kept on the roadster and not launched as a separate object





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1953459 8-Feb-2018 08:58
Send private message

Beccara:

 

I think the primary difference is RocketLab's didn't need more payload, It was an unneeded secondary payload that was kept secret whereas everyone knew and accepted that FH was going to have a big mass simulator and it was going to go quite far out

 

 

 

Edit:// To be fair the ARK was a surprise but it's being kept on the roadster and not launched as a separate object

 

 

I read Rocketlab's was a test deployment. It wasn't secret, and it want a hey look at this either.


992 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159

UberGroup

  Reply # 1953461 8-Feb-2018 09:03
Send private message

The humanity star was, The press before was about 3 customer payloads. SpaceX was pretty open about what the FH payload was





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1953466 8-Feb-2018 09:11
Send private message

Beccara:

 

The humanity star was, The press before was about 3 customer payloads. SpaceX was pretty open about what the FH payload was

 

 

Maybe the next launch will be a garden shed hopefully

 

Rocketlabs was in the news, no secret. because they didnt make a hoopla about it leading to the launch shows it wasn't a publicity stunt. SpaceX should have out a similar useful satellite for its special thing, something that meant something or did something vaguely useful. Its very clear that the silly factor from SpaceX is way cool, and the meaningful factor from Rocketlabs was pretty much bagged in the other thread. As I said, fickle


1461 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 739


  Reply # 1953467 8-Feb-2018 09:11
Send private message

Click to see full size

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5361587/SpaceX-confirms-DID-lose-Falcon-Heavy-rocket.html

"Where is Musk's Tesla now?

The Falcon Heavy's unusual cargo was sent into an unplanned trajectory when SpaceX accidentally over-fired the rocket's third booster stage.

The booster stages were supposed to make small adjustments to the vehicle's path before it disconnected from the final rocket component and began to coast unaided through space at around 7 miles per second (11 km/s).

Instead of intersecting with Mars' orbit around the sun, the Tesla missed by some distance, flying past the planet at an unknown distance and continuing deep into the solar system.

On Twitter, Musk said the car 'exceeded Mars orbit and kept going to the Asteroid Belt', referring to the disk of asteroids in the solar system between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

SpaceX had said before launch that they had no plans to track the Tesla, and with the firm's cameras running out of battery 12 hours into the vehicle's journey, it's almost impossible to tell where Starman is now."

18317 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1953489 8-Feb-2018 09:29
3 people support this post
Send private message



SpaceX had said before launch that they had no plans to track the Tesla, and with the firm's cameras running out of battery 12 hours into the vehicle's journey, it's almost impossible to tell where Starman is now."

 

That makes the waste even worse in my book. The guy who is the face of solar on the planet, couldn't have mounted a battery that was solar powered to the car to allow them to track it. 

 

 


3500 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 626

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1953492 8-Feb-2018 09:31
2 people support this post
Send private message

kingdragonfly: Click to see full size

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5361587/SpaceX-confirms-DID-lose-Falcon-Heavy-rocket.html

"Where is Musk's Tesla now?

The Falcon Heavy's unusual cargo was sent into an unplanned trajectory when SpaceX accidentally over-fired the rocket's third booster stage.

The booster stages were supposed to make small adjustments to the vehicle's path before it disconnected from the final rocket component and began to coast unaided through space at around 7 miles per second (11 km/s).

Instead of intersecting with Mars' orbit around the sun, the Tesla missed by some distance, flying past the planet at an unknown distance and continuing deep into the solar system.

On Twitter, Musk said the car 'exceeded Mars orbit and kept going to the Asteroid Belt', referring to the disk of asteroids in the solar system between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

SpaceX had said before launch that they had no plans to track the Tesla, and with the firm's cameras running out of battery 12 hours into the vehicle's journey, it's almost impossible to tell where Starman is now."


So, unless SpaceX has secretly developed Warp Drive technology, what they mean to say is that the trajectory now exceeds Mars orbit and is headed to the Asteroid Belt. Even the Millennium Falcon on the Kessel run would only just be going past Mars by now.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

5119 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2085


  Reply # 1953512 8-Feb-2018 10:15
One person supports this post
Send private message

Now that we see the shipping method, we can all understand why Tesla keep missing it's volume targets ...





Mike

18317 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5246

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1953515 8-Feb-2018 10:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

Now that we see the shipping method, we can all understand why Tesla keep missing it's volume targets ...

 

 

This provided me some amusement, thank you!

 

 


11900 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3858

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1953652 8-Feb-2018 14:21
Send private message

Can I ask a dumb question: why not attach a parachute to the bit that keeps crashing in the ocean instead of having to lift and and then use fuel to bring it back? You could take up less fuel, then use the fuel left to get it close enough to be recovered and use a parachute for a soft, non-explosive landing.






11900 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3858

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1953653 8-Feb-2018 14:23
Send private message

networkn:

 



SpaceX had said before launch that they had no plans to track the Tesla, and with the firm's cameras running out of battery 12 hours into the vehicle's journey, it's almost impossible to tell where Starman is now."

 

That makes the waste even worse in my book. The guy who is the face of solar on the planet, couldn't have mounted a battery that was solar powered to the car to allow them to track it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Think of the marketing: "Tesla Solar Panels - The Only Solar Panels you can buy proven to work in space reliably!"






992 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159

UberGroup

  Reply # 1953655 8-Feb-2018 14:29
Send private message

Hypersonic parachutes are tricky, expensive and hold a certain amount of unknowns that cant be accounted for. They also cant return the stage back to land so it would have to always be a barge landing. Remember at MECO S1 is going 8000+ kph

 

Once the software and hardware issues are found and resolved propulsive landings are more reliable





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

13430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2428

Trusted

  Reply # 1953657 8-Feb-2018 14:32
Send private message

Geektastic:

 

Can I ask a dumb question: why not attach a parachute to the bit that keeps crashing in the ocean instead of having to lift and and then use fuel to bring it back? You could take up less fuel, then use the fuel left to get it close enough to be recovered and use a parachute for a soft, non-explosive landing.

 

 

To have fuel left for the recovery (I assume you mean to slow it down on descent) you would need to take more fuel up, plus to take that extra fuel you need more fuel to carry it up. The problem with rockets is they need so much fuel to get the craft to orbital velocity, so you need lots of fuel and you need big fuel tank (the rocket) and now you are carrying so much weight you need even more horsepower (fuel)

 

 

 

But you do get the benefit of travelling at 17,000mph using no fuel once you are up there

 

 

 

EDIT take that back, the bit that crashed was meant to land like the other two wasn't it? 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.