hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it’s data input, which is a bit lapse in areas

Engine No: ZJ

Chassis: DY3W-436537

It's easy enough to determine chain or belt simply by looking under the bonnet. Post photos of the engine at the accessory belt end and we'll tell you.

@hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it's data input, which is a bit lapse in areas

OT, I know, but don't you mean "a bit lax"?. I've never heard of lapse used in that context. A quick Google doesn't yield any "a bit lapse" results but given the definition of lapse it could fit. I'm now genuinely intrigued to know whether I've been using it wrong all these years or whether only one or both are acceptable.

cadman:

It's easy enough to determine chain or belt simply by looking under the bonnet. Post photos of the engine at the accessory belt end and we'll tell you.

@hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it's data input, which is a bit lapse in areas

OT, I know, but don't you mean "a bit lax"?. I've never heard of lapse used in that context. A quick Google doesn't yield any "a bit lapse" results but given the definition of lapse it could fit. I'm now genuinely intrigued to know whether I've been using it wrong all these years or whether only one or both are acceptable.

hsvhel: No idea mate, wouldn’t be surprised if it was incorrect-lazy dialect and all

Damn. Another rabbit hole to go down! Haha