Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 


67 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 1978334 15-Mar-2018 22:03
Send private message

Sorry missed that post
Car jam has Engine no as ZJ

420 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 128


  Reply # 1978444 16-Mar-2018 09:13
Send private message

What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it’s data input, which is a bit lapse in areas



67 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 1978445 16-Mar-2018 09:18
Send private message

hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it’s data input, which is a bit lapse in areas

 

Engine No: ZJ

 

Chassis: DY3W-436537


1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1978764 16-Mar-2018 16:49
Send private message

It's easy enough to determine chain or belt simply by looking under the bonnet. Post photos of the engine at the accessory belt end and we'll tell you.

 

@hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it's data input, which is a bit lapse in areas

 

OT, I know, but don't you mean "a bit lax"?. I've never heard of lapse used in that context. A quick Google doesn't yield any "a bit lapse" results but given the definition of lapse it could fit. I'm now genuinely intrigued to know whether I've been using it wrong all these years or whether only one or both are acceptable.


420 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 128


  Reply # 1978805 16-Mar-2018 17:12
Send private message

cadman:

It's easy enough to determine chain or belt simply by looking under the bonnet. Post photos of the engine at the accessory belt end and we'll tell you.


@hsvhel: What’s the engine number on the car, carjam is only as accurate as it's data input, which is a bit lapse in areas


OT, I know, but don't you mean "a bit lax"?. I've never heard of lapse used in that context. A quick Google doesn't yield any "a bit lapse" results but given the definition of lapse it could fit. I'm now genuinely intrigued to know whether I've been using it wrong all these years or whether only one or both are acceptable.



No idea mate, wouldn’t be surprised if it was incorrect-lazy dialect and all

1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1978809 16-Mar-2018 17:25
Send private message

hsvhel: No idea mate, wouldn’t be surprised if it was incorrect-lazy dialect and all

 

Damn. Another rabbit hole to go down! Haha


1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.