Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


17920 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5167

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 231924 20-Mar-2018 16:40
Send private message

http://www.bbc.com/news/business-43459156

 

It was inevitable. 

 

Of course, there will be plenty of commentaries that humans kill people in cars as well. 

 

The difference is, people can be held accountable. 

 

Uber has suspended it's driverless operations whilst it investigates, a logical and smart thing to do. 

 

Interestingly, there was a human monitor in the car. The person killed was not on a ped crossing. 

 

 

 

 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 12
3055 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1538


  Reply # 1980591 20-Mar-2018 16:43
Send private message

So it was the pedestrians fault?




Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



347 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 72

Subscriber

  Reply # 1980618 20-Mar-2018 17:39
Send private message

networkn: The difference is, people can be held accountable.

 

Absolutely people will be held accountable when driverless cars crash. In a situation like this the software will be smart enough to identify several possibilities - maybe steer for a possible safe gap, a child, an animal, or simply carry on and hit the obstruction ahead. The manufacturer's software will make these life-or-death decisions, the logic will be clearly evident, and the manufacturer will be culpable.

 

 





McLean

bmt

431 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 129


  Reply # 1980623 20-Mar-2018 17:48
Send private message

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

I'd replace every single car with driverless ones tomorrow if the technology was there. The downside is that the resultant reduced death rate would actually be bad for the planet but that's an existential crisis for society really..


4395 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2401

Trusted

  Reply # 1980630 20-Mar-2018 18:15
3 people support this post
Send private message

I think I'll stick with Johnny Cabs:

 




17920 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5167

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1980631 20-Mar-2018 18:19
Send private message

mclean:

 

networkn: The difference is, people can be held accountable.

 

Absolutely people will be held accountable when driverless cars crash. In a situation like this the software will be smart enough to identify several possibilities - maybe steer for a possible safe gap, a child, an animal, or simply carry on and hit the obstruction ahead. The manufacturer's software will make these life-or-death decisions, the logic will be clearly evident, and the manufacturer will be culpable.

 

 

 

 

I wonder what the punishment will be for this particular infringement then?

 

 




17920 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5167

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1980639 20-Mar-2018 18:31
Send private message

bmt:

 

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

I'd replace every single car with driverless ones tomorrow if the technology was there. The downside is that the resultant reduced death rate would actually be bad for the planet but that's an existential crisis for society really..

 

 

Heh, of course you would. 

 

The problem is, the technology isn't there. But, they are still on the roads!

 

 


gzt

10113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1539


  Reply # 1980670 20-Mar-2018 19:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

Writeup from Fortune says inevitable:

Fortune: According to the Chronicle, the preliminary investigation found the Uber car was driving at 38 mph in a 35 mph zone and did not attempt to brake. Herzberg is said to have abruptly walked from a center median into a lane with traffic. Police believe she may have been homeless.

It's hard to know. Humans are likely to be much better at understanding the situation as it develops and minimising damage. As in holy ------ it looks like that crazy person is going to.. Center median seems kind of obvious.

Edit: autonomous car exceeding speed limit? There's a story there as well.

2661 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 663


  Reply # 1980706 20-Mar-2018 20:51
3 people support this post
Send private message

bmt:

 

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

I'd replace every single car with driverless ones tomorrow if the technology was there. The downside is that the resultant reduced death rate would actually be bad for the planet but that's an existential crisis for society really..

 

 

the problem with testing in the USA is that reporting is voluntary, so how many incidents have not been reported if they show driverless cars are not as safe as the companies say they are.  





Common sense is not as common as you think.


gzt

10113 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1539


  Reply # 1980714 20-Mar-2018 21:07
One person supports this post
Send private message

Also, Volvo. Urban legend.

1019 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1980737 20-Mar-2018 21:54
Send private message

You can't stop a suicidal pedestrian from using your vehicle to their own end. The laws of physics still apply to driverless vehicles.


13173 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2355

Trusted

  Reply # 1980795 21-Mar-2018 07:15
2 people support this post
Send private message

bmt:

 

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

 

 

 

I think this 1 death is very high.

 

NZ is tracking to 400 deaths per year, we have 2 million cars, and for that number in use for 365 days to get 400 deaths is more or less 1 per day for 2 million cars.

 

How many driverless are used in testing in the US? No idea but as its a handful of locations, it's likely to be dozens not millions.

 

We need to know more about this death. Did she walk out suddenly into its path, or did the car have ample warning to brake and divert? before this testing hit the public roading system, they must have tested against all manner of avoidable and unavoidable objects, so I want to know was this avoidable or reducible. If it was, why didnt the car react. And also how much responsibility does that car have, and its human caretaker driver.


577 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 93


  Reply # 1980847 21-Mar-2018 08:54
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

bmt:

 

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

 

 

 

I think this 1 death is very high.

 

NZ is tracking to 400 deaths per year, we have 2 million cars, and for that number in use for 365 days to get 400 deaths is more or less 1 per day for 2 million cars.

 

How many driverless are used in testing in the US? No idea but as its a handful of locations, it's likely to be dozens not millions.

 

We need to know more about this death. Did she walk out suddenly into its path, or did the car have ample warning to brake and divert? before this testing hit the public roading system, they must have tested against all manner of avoidable and unavoidable objects, so I want to know was this avoidable or reducible. If it was, why didnt the car react. And also how much responsibility does that car have, and its human caretaker driver.

 

 

Yup, I agree, its too high already at just 1...I wonder if comparing my actual mileage against that driverless car, would I be worse or better? Given I have not managed to kill (or crash even) in about 30 years of driving :\ 

 

It had to happen eventually at some stage, but what will be interesting is to hear the details come out of the situation and the likely remedy to path the way to a solution.


1486 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 334


  Reply # 1980851 21-Mar-2018 09:01
Send private message

The video report shows a bent bicycle in the frame, but no mention in the written account.

2516 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 967

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1980864 21-Mar-2018 09:25
One person supports this post
Send private message

scuwp: So it was the pedestrians fault?

 

Probably. I bet pedestrians and cyclists are safer around driverless cars than human driven cars. I hope this tragedy doesn't lead to irrational blowback and delays in the technology coming into general use.


2516 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 967

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1980866 21-Mar-2018 09:28
Send private message

vexxxboy:

 

bmt:

 

One single death after how many miles of driverless operation? As compared to human driving?

 

I'd replace every single car with driverless ones tomorrow if the technology was there. The downside is that the resultant reduced death rate would actually be bad for the planet but that's an existential crisis for society really..

 

 

the problem with testing in the USA is that reporting is voluntary, so how many incidents have not been reported if they show driverless cars are not as safe as the companies say they are.  

 

 

Really? It won't be voluntary to report injury accidents.

 

I would be very surprised if their testing is not under strict reporting conditions.

 

 

 

 


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | ... | 12
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.