Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  Reply # 2063820 27-Jul-2018 19:51
One person supports this post
Send private message

The footpaths in the pictures could, or could’ve been, combined cycle/walkways. They seem to work quite well and the seperation gives both a real and perceived sense of increased safety.

3044 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 467

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2063908 28-Jul-2018 09:24
Send private message

Geektastic: It's an odd design. European cycle designs usually have a cycles only box in front of all the cars. This would make the cycles clearly visible to the cars as well as ensuring they get away ahead of the cars when the lights change.

 

Look again, that intersection does have a bicycle storage bay in front of the car stop line. As usual though, most drivers are idiots and stop in it because they're either oblivious or don't care.

 

Lastman: The footpaths in the pictures could, or could’ve been, combined cycle/walkways. They seem to work quite well and the seperation gives both a real and perceived sense of increased safety.

 

Funny you say that though, considering every time I see a cycling discussion mention shared paths cyclists immediately rear up and proclaim how those are stupid and dangerous and impractical and they would never use them, preferring the road lanes instead.


 
 
 
 


209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  Reply # 2063936 28-Jul-2018 10:16
Send private message

Funny you say that though, considering every time I see a cycling discussion mention shared paths cyclists immediately rear up and proclaim how those are stupid and dangerous and impractical and they would never use them, preferring the road lanes instead.


You’ll never make everyone happy. The national cycleway system is shared and it seems to work well from what I’ve seen. Not ever footpath may be suitable but I think it’s a good option in the mix.



209 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 57


  Reply # 2063953 28-Jul-2018 10:57
One person supports this post
Send private message

A dutch solution:

 


4163 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 760

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2064073 28-Jul-2018 12:16
Send private message

Lastman: The footpaths in the pictures could, or could’ve been, combined cycle/walkways. They seem to work quite well and the seperation gives both a real and perceived sense of increased safety.

 

As a pedestrian and public transport user, the cyclist behaviour that I have experienced has really turned me against combining footpaths and cycleways. When cyclists are on the road they are vulnerable, but putting them on the footpath just shifts that risk from the cyclist to the pedestrian. 

 

There was a terrible pedestrian vs cyclist accident on the dangerous Island Bay cycleway last year, and it could very easily have been fatal.


12151 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3965

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2064075 28-Jul-2018 12:21
Send private message

Lastman:

 

A dutch solution:

 

 

 

 

 

No, that would never work here.......no Kiwi experience etc etc...yell






1249 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 256

Subscriber

  Reply # 2064284 28-Jul-2018 17:47
Send private message

Question: if i am in a car, indicating to turn left, and there is a gap in the cycle lane, and I start my left turn then the cyclist hits me in the b pillar - haven't they broken the road code? Isn't there some requirement to allow a car changing lanes in and not close the gap?

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure in auckland you get fined for closing the gap on someone trying to change lanes. Why not here? It seems to apply.

 

 

 

The only other option in the accident was the car over took the cyclist late (removing the i didn't seem them defence) and tried to cut around in front forcing the cyclist to brake - instead of braking and letting cyclist through first.

 

 

 

 





nunz

Hmm, what to write...
1000 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 511

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2064285 28-Jul-2018 17:54
Send private message

nunz:

 

Question: if i am in a car, indicating to turn left, and there is a gap in the cycle lane, and I start my left turn then the cyclist hits me in the b pillar - haven't they broken the road code? Isn't there some requirement to allow a car changing lanes in and not close the gap?

 

 

 

I'm pretty sure in auckland you get fined for closing the gap on someone trying to change lanes. Why not here? It seems to apply.

 

 

No, If you change lanes you have to give way. There is no requirement for someone to let you in. Indicating doesn't give you right of way...I know bus drivers think it does...but they are bigger than me (so is the bus)





Matthew


787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 191


  Reply # 2064340 28-Jul-2018 20:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

Lastman: The footpaths in the pictures could, or could’ve been, combined cycle/walkways. They seem to work quite well and the seperation gives both a real and perceived sense of increased safety.

 

Combined cycle/walkways work great for cyclists that are traveling slowly, i.e when I am riding with my children.  They don't work great when i am traveling at speed, i.e when I am cycling to work.  I can be travelling in excess of 40km/hr.  Cycling at that type of speed with pedestrians isn't safe.

 

I used to cycle in to work most days, got hit 3 times in a year, 2 of the times in a cycle lane, I now run, easier to avoid cars.


5294 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2147


  Reply # 2064833 30-Jul-2018 10:18
Send private message

scuwp:

 

Yes there are obstructions to visibility, but that is not an excuse to claim a 'blind spot' caused a crash.  An observant driver using proper techniques (taught at any basic defensive driving course) will effectively scan and observe other vehicles/cyclists etc and will be aware of their environment at all times. 

 

 

If you are saying blind spots do exist, but an observant driver should be mindful of them and make allowances, then I agree.





Mike

343 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 125


  Reply # 2064895 30-Jul-2018 11:55
Send private message

The Nelson Street raised barrier islands (?) seems to do well, it separates cyclists and gives them their own lights at the intersection on Wellesley st west.



361 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 75

Subscriber

  Reply # 2064913 30-Jul-2018 12:27
Send private message

SpartanVXL: The Nelson Street raised barrier islands (?) seems to do well, it separates cyclists and gives them their own lights at the intersection on Wellesley st west.

 

Ah, separate light sequence = problem solved.





McLean

2910 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 313


  Reply # 2064917 30-Jul-2018 12:35
Send private message

mclean:

 

SpartanVXL: The Nelson Street raised barrier islands (?) seems to do well, it separates cyclists and gives them their own lights at the intersection on Wellesley st west.

 

Ah, separate light sequence = problem solved.

 

 

You would think right.

 

https://goo.gl/maps/Ud68QkWW6SQ2 

 

When pedestrian. I've Seen..

 

cyclist run the red bike

 

Cars run the red left arrow and nearly take out cyclist

 

Nearly been taken out by cyclist ignoring


3100 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1570


  Reply # 2064939 30-Jul-2018 13:06
Send private message

Mesmerising, but might be of interest.  Loved the 'turbo' roundabout!  If only drivers actually merged and used lanes properly like they show here.  Cyclists and pedestrians ideally need grade separation...couldn't imagine trying to do some of these on me bike. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Always be yourself, unless you can be Batman, then always be the Batman



4129 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 552

Trusted

  Reply # 2064948 30-Jul-2018 13:26
Send private message

scuwp:

 

Mesmerising, but might be of interest.  Loved the 'turbo' roundabout!  If only drivers actually merged and used lanes properly like they show here.  Cyclists and pedestrians ideally need grade separation...couldn't imagine trying to do some of these on me bike. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Definitely the turbine...





Previously known as psycik

NextPVR: 
Gigabyte AMD A8 Brix --> Samsung LA46A650D via HDMI, NextPVR,
OpenHAB: ODroid C2 eMMC DriveOpenHAB with Aeotech ZWave Controller, Raspberry PI, Wemos D1 Mini, Zwave and Bluetooth LE Sensors
Media:Chromecast v2, ATV4, Roku3, HDHomeRun Dual
Windows 2012 
Host (Plex Server/Crashplan): 2x2TB, 2x3TB, 1x4TB using DriveBender, Samsung 850 evo 512 GB SSD, Hyper-V Server with 1xW10, 1xW2k8, 2xUbuntu 16.04 LTS, Crashplan, NextPVR channel for Plex,NextPVR Metadata Agent and Scanner for Plex


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.