ockel:
frednz:
tdgeek:
frednz:
I think there would be a considerable amount of public criticism if the cost of new EVs for Govt departments meant that expenditure on essential items had to be curtailed to some extent.
Wrong. Govt or a business are better placed to buy a new EV. They do that for one reason. Saving. So when a Govt or business outfits itself with EV its a saving not an extra cost.
I don't think it's as black and white as that! I think there's a fair bit of pressure on Govt Departments and politicians to buy EVs to show they're supporting the Government's climate change objectives. Cost accountants within the Government might be hard pressed to prove that buying new EVs at high prices produces cost savings to taxpayers!
And yet in the stroke of an announcement the Govt can reduce its future earnings by $8-9bn and axe jobs to show it supports climate change objectives. The cost accountants didnt even get to do their analysis. MBIE and Treasury are now counting the cost of the policy on oil & gas - and the Minister is still choosing to ignore it on the basis of political ideology! Surely EV's benefits are more quantifiable.
O+G is not the same. O+G companies have a HUGE amount of untapped exploration despite the cut to new exploration. They give up on new areas as there is so much unexplored. The Govt is going to cut them some slack but what has this got to do with EV? If the Govt went full EV who cares? The masses want an option. At 60k its no option. Charging stations are already well established. Its ok if we let it evolve naturally. Get back to this thread in 15 years