Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
532 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  Reply # 485406 24-Jun-2011 12:15
Send private message

I think networkn has some sort of private gripe with Qantas that he is not telling us about as he sure seems pretty messed up about them and the possibility of disaster. Maybe he had a panic attack on a Qantas aircraft while it was still at the gate and they had to remove him for the sake of the safety of the other passengers Surprised? Or maybe in the air and they had to 'cuff him Wink?

But it could be that he has his airlines mixed up Wink as he seems to be determined to post continually "Qantas Incidents" in a thread titled "Air NZ Incidents".



14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485408 24-Jun-2011 12:17
Send private message

John: I think you need to read the OP and see what you have to say about what is actually being discussed here. The whole thread is off topic, but if you have such an issue, feel free to unsubscribe from the thread.

 
 
 
 


2007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485418 24-Jun-2011 12:25
Send private message

FFS networkn anyone who has ever looked at this thread knows you will never fly Qantas. Why keep rehashing the same crap?

My wife flys with Air NZ, many of her friends do as well, I couldn't tell you the number of times that a burning smell has been detected in the plane before, it's not that uncommon.

Why can't you see that the media has jumped on the Qantas-bashing bandwagon and is trying to make it look like they are plagued with incidents, when the reality is they happen to all airlines at various times? At the moment, if it doesn't happen to Qantas it's not newsworthy, if it does happen to Qantas we get the "it's the latest in a string of incidents" sensationalism from the media.




MacBook Pro 13" w/ Touch Bar (Early 2017) | iPad Pro 10.5 Wi-Fi 128GB (Space Grey) | iPhone 7 Plus 128GB (Product RED) | Apple TV 4K | Apple TV (4th Generation) | Apple Watch Series 3 42mm (Space Grey)

1923 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 139


  Reply # 485423 24-Jun-2011 12:28
Send private message

networkn: You mean Qantas has inferior navigation systems making it less safe for them. It's the reason they often can't land in Qtown or Wellington

Speculative misinterpretation.

Their current systems may not be compatible with some of the services available at Wellington and Queenstown, but it doesn't stop them finding the airports and landing there most of the time. And neither does it make their aircraft less safe.



14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485429 24-Jun-2011 12:36
Send private message

It must make them less safe (relatively) if they have inferior or less navigation equipment on the plane.

7652 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 731

Subscriber

  Reply # 485438 24-Jun-2011 12:53
Send private message

Aren't you all glad that the merger of Qantas and Air NZ didn't go ahead?? If it had there would be no one flying in NZ or across the ditch at the moment..




Regards,

Old3eyes




14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485442 24-Jun-2011 12:56
Send private message

Yes I am very happy about that.

637 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted

  Reply # 485444 24-Jun-2011 12:58
Send private message

networkn: It must make them less safe (relatively) if they have inferior or less navigation equipment on the plane.

Not really. It's more analogous to a 2WD vehicle and a 4WD vehicle.  The 4WD vehicle can drive on roadways or paths that the 2WD vehicle can't.  It does not make the 2WD less safe, just that it is not equipped to drive (land) on certain roadways (airports) when the conditions require 4WD (aircraft with RNP).



14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485446 24-Jun-2011 13:00
Send private message

pen: ok, well I'll accept that point. It does means that it's less safe to fly those airlines to those destinations however.

637 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 2

Trusted

  Reply # 485447 24-Jun-2011 13:07
Send private message

networkn: pen: ok, well I'll accept that point. It does means that it's less safe to fly those airlines to those destinations however.

It doesn't make them any less safe.  It just means when the airport conditions are outside the parameters their aircraft are equipped to land in, they don't land.  That does not make them less safe (you could argue it makes them more safe, since they're not landing in questionable weather at all...)

532 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 28


  Reply # 485758 25-Jun-2011 14:24
Send private message

networkn:  It does means that it's less safe to fly those airlines to those destinations however.


As someone who has had more than a little experience with aeronautical nav systems in a number of countries, including managing the design of approach and departure procedures, I can tell you that your claim is, as is becoming typical with your claims, entirely incorrect.


 

2007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485761 25-Jun-2011 14:31
Send private message

Time to let this thread die networkn, you're getting more and more out of your depth with your baseless claims.




MacBook Pro 13" w/ Touch Bar (Early 2017) | iPad Pro 10.5 Wi-Fi 128GB (Space Grey) | iPhone 7 Plus 128GB (Product RED) | Apple TV 4K | Apple TV (4th Generation) | Apple Watch Series 3 42mm (Space Grey)



14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485859 25-Jun-2011 19:03
Send private message

corksta: It's your opinion that they are baseless, I feel they have plenty of base, and if you don't like the thread, no-one is forcing you to read it.

2007 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 195

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485877 25-Jun-2011 19:51
Send private message

So I guess John2010 doesn't know what he's talking about either hmmm?

I'm reading it for its entertainment value and wondering what claim you'll come out with next!




MacBook Pro 13" w/ Touch Bar (Early 2017) | iPad Pro 10.5 Wi-Fi 128GB (Space Grey) | iPhone 7 Plus 128GB (Product RED) | Apple TV 4K | Apple TV (4th Generation) | Apple Watch Series 3 42mm (Space Grey)



14885 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3810

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 485912 25-Jun-2011 22:37
Send private message

corksta: So I guess John2010 doesn't know what he's talking about either hmmm?

I'm reading it for its entertainment value and wondering what claim you'll come out with next!


In other words, trolling.

I am not disputing John's expertise, though I find his manner condescending and bordering on rude, which seems completely unnecessary. I have capitulated a few of the points made by other people.

As I have REPEATEDLY said, my research and the information I have leads me to my OPINION that it's safer right now to fly AirNZ than Qantas. I didn't ask to be convinced any differently and I certainly am not trying to stop anyone else from flying on any airline they wish. I certainly don't understand the aggressive and unpleasant tone taken by some of the people who oppose my opinion especially since, this thread started on a completely different topic. Also for the record, I hadn't posted anything for quite a while and it was another who started the debate by pointing out an AirNZ incident.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28


Vodafone says Internet of Things (IoT) crucial for digital transformation
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:06


Police and Facebook launch AMBER Alerts system in NZ
Posted 9-Nov-2017 10:49


Amazon debuts Fire TV Stick Basic Edition in over 100 new countries
Posted 8-Nov-2017 05:34


Vodafone VoIP transition to start this month
Posted 7-Nov-2017 12:33


Spark enhances IoT network capability
Posted 7-Nov-2017 11:33


Vocus NZ sale and broadband competition
Posted 6-Nov-2017 14:36


Hawaiki reaches key milestone in landmark deep-sea fibre project
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:53


Countdown launches new proximity online shopping app
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:50


Nokia 3310 to be available through Spark New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2017 13:31


Nest launches in New Zealand
Posted 4-Nov-2017 12:31


Active wholesale as Chorus tackles wireless challenge
Posted 3-Nov-2017 10:55



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.