![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Athlonite: They shouldn't be able to give you an ticket if
a: there's nowhere else for you to park the car
b: it's outside your place of residence
c: it's being taken somewhere for repairs ( although it should be on a trailer and not being driven)
so Legally the ticket wouldn't stand up in court just tell them to shove it (go see a nz law society lawyer first for advice) But I think you'll find you should not have been ticketed at all
stevenz: That was explained to them, the reply was essentially "Tough." - if the WOF expired more than 4 weeks ago, all bets are off regardless of excuse. Perhaps Hamilton's council isn't run by such a bunch of anti-car lefties and are a tad more lenient?
Presumably putting the rego on hold would just mean 2 reasons it shouldn't on the road though, not sure that'd work.
Bung: That isn't relevant to parking. All that means is that you get a retest without paying another test fee.But you can continue to drive the car while that period is present.. Which means you can t expect to be ticketed for using it..
Bung: Wrong
From the AA
"
There is one exception to this rule. And that's if you're in the process of bringing the car into compliance or obtaining a new WoF.
stevenz: So if you've no access to offstreet parking, what do they expect you to do with it in the meantime?
Bung:Athlonite: They shouldn't be able to give you an ticket if
a: there's nowhere else for you to park the car
b: it's outside your place of residence
c: it's being taken somewhere for repairs ( although it should be on a trailer and not being driven)
so Legally the ticket wouldn't stand up in court just tell them to shove it (go see a nz law society lawyer first for advice) But I think you'll find you should not have been ticketed at all
So far it's only been $200, why pay more money to a lawyer to find that your advice is totally wrong.
If the car has already been ticketed once, putting a cover on it isn't going to fool anyone.
nickd: What if you got a car cover that goes all the way around the car so they can't see the warrant and rego to 'protect it from the elements'? Is this a smart idea or am I just being thick about something?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |