![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nebukadnessar
markhodgeNZ: Okay. I've asked them directly since it looks like not many people here are using MyRepublic in Dunedin and able to give me results. Will see what answers I get.
Nebbie: One problem you will only start to see now plan speeds are 100mbit+ is latency will affect total throughput when latency increase. Using more than one thread for the transfer will obviously increase total throughput speeds.
jnimmo: If both of you have public IP addresses though surely that traffic would be routed at the POP in Dunedin, rather than going up to the CGNAT equipment?
markhodgeNZ:markhodgeNZ: Okay. I've asked them directly since it looks like not many people here are using MyRepublic in Dunedin and able to give me results. Will see what answers I get.
MyRepublic confirm they aren't rate limiting so we will test further tonight hopefully.
Glastnost test reports issues with some protocols but a very thorough p2p test last night was giving several mb/sec down, and I'm getting 10-12MB/sec off http://ucmirror.canterbury.ac.nz/linux/ubuntu/vivid/ for ubuntu ISOs (thanks k1w1k1d). These both seem reasonable. I suspect the former was improved by plugging directly into the router rather than via a gigabit switch as MyRepublic suggested, but don't expect that would make much difference to my HFS upload speed since it is to a single address.
Is anyone else aware of any good alternatives to HFS HTTP File Server I could try on Windows as well? I was getting similar poor performance with CoreFTP's free sftp server FWIW.
Cheers,
Mark
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |