Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | ... | 203


15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606431 8-Aug-2016 16:46
Send private message quote this post

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder what happens with our #10's now. If BB gets a starting position, where does that leave Cruden? Our third choice (Injury cover)? He isn't a bench player since he has no utility value, so I am thinking potentially Sopoaga goes on the pine. Bit tough on Cruden as I think he had a pretty good

 

season with the Chiefs.

 

 

Sapoaga - does he also have utility value? Sure, he moved out to 12 vs the Lions once Osborne went off, and I think he's played at FB once in a pinch, but he's just a straight number 10.

 

 

Yeah I'd be inclined to agree actually, but are we going to put 2 dedicated 10's out of a job to make way for Barrett? (And realistically who would then be promoted?) There have been rumors that Barrett has said that if he earns a starting position (Which I think he has easily done this year) and doesn't get one, he is going to consider his overseas options, which it would be hard not to agree with. Having said that, the AB's are about team first, and Barrett's impact from the bench is undeniable. As good as the Hurricanes have been, I don't think they have had too many battles where they have really had to grind for 60+ minutes to get an opening in the last 10-20 minutes, and I don't really see Barrett in that grind role. Maybe that's wrong or unfair, but it's my impression.

 

 

Yeah, the grind is essentially the Cane vs Savea argument. Cane does a lot less of the running stuff, but gets stuck in to tackling / hitting rucks etc (not that Ardie doesn't) 

 

 

 

 

Right, which is why I prefer Cane (Todd) over Savea to start. Difference is, I don't think (at least for now) Savea is going to mind coming off the bench.

 

 


332 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1606563 8-Aug-2016 20:15
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder what happens with our #10's now. If BB gets a starting position, where does that leave Cruden? Our third choice (Injury cover)? He isn't a bench player since he has no utility value, so I am thinking potentially Sopoaga goes on the pine. Bit tough on Cruden as I think he had a pretty good

 

season with the Chiefs.

 

 

Sapoaga - does he also have utility value? Sure, he moved out to 12 vs the Lions once Osborne went off, and I think he's played at FB once in a pinch, but he's just a straight number 10.

 

 

Yeah I'd be inclined to agree actually, but are we going to put 2 dedicated 10's out of a job to make way for Barrett? (And realistically who would then be promoted?) There have been rumors that Barrett has said that if he earns a starting position (Which I think he has easily done this year) and doesn't get one, he is going to consider his overseas options, which it would be hard not to agree with. Having said that, the AB's are about team first, and Barrett's impact from the bench is undeniable. As good as the Hurricanes have been, I don't think they have had too many battles where they have really had to grind for 60+ minutes to get an opening in the last 10-20 minutes, and I don't really see Barrett in that grind role. Maybe that's wrong or unfair, but it's my impression.

 

 

Why are we putting two dedicated 10's out of a job if Barrett starts?

 

I don't think there's any doubt that Barrett is the form 10 at the moment.  But you don't consider him a 10?  We're only puttng one 10 out of a job if Barrett starts and Cruden/Sopoaga are on the bench (personally I hope it's Sopoaga).  All three of them are 10's.

 

If you want to bring one off the pine you drop Barrett back to fullback.

 

Simple.


 
 
 
 


Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606596 8-Aug-2016 20:47
Send private message quote this post

tukapa1:

 

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder what happens with our #10's now. If BB gets a starting position, where does that leave Cruden? Our third choice (Injury cover)? He isn't a bench player since he has no utility value, so I am thinking potentially Sopoaga goes on the pine. Bit tough on Cruden as I think he had a pretty good

 

season with the Chiefs.

 

 

Sapoaga - does he also have utility value? Sure, he moved out to 12 vs the Lions once Osborne went off, and I think he's played at FB once in a pinch, but he's just a straight number 10.

 

 

Yeah I'd be inclined to agree actually, but are we going to put 2 dedicated 10's out of a job to make way for Barrett? (And realistically who would then be promoted?) There have been rumors that Barrett has said that if he earns a starting position (Which I think he has easily done this year) and doesn't get one, he is going to consider his overseas options, which it would be hard not to agree with. Having said that, the AB's are about team first, and Barrett's impact from the bench is undeniable. As good as the Hurricanes have been, I don't think they have had too many battles where they have really had to grind for 60+ minutes to get an opening in the last 10-20 minutes, and I don't really see Barrett in that grind role. Maybe that's wrong or unfair, but it's my impression.

 

 

Why are we putting two dedicated 10's out of a job if Barrett starts?

 

I don't think there's any doubt that Barrett is the form 10 at the moment.  But you don't consider him a 10?  We're only puttng one 10 out of a job if Barrett starts and Cruden/Sopoaga are on the bench (personally I hope it's Sopoaga).  All three of them are 10's.

 

If you want to bring one off the pine you drop Barrett back to fullback.

 

Simple.

 

 

The bench is not merely for subs taking the place of unexpected injury.

 

You have 3 backs on the bench to make a big impact to shake the opposition. One of them has to be a half back, that leaves 2.

 

Unfortunately Cruden and Sopoaga neither of them are impact players.


332 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1606602 8-Aug-2016 21:00
Send private message quote this post

joker97:

 

tukapa1:

 

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

I wonder what happens with our #10's now. If BB gets a starting position, where does that leave Cruden? Our third choice (Injury cover)? He isn't a bench player since he has no utility value, so I am thinking potentially Sopoaga goes on the pine. Bit tough on Cruden as I think he had a pretty good

 

season with the Chiefs.

 

 

Sapoaga - does he also have utility value? Sure, he moved out to 12 vs the Lions once Osborne went off, and I think he's played at FB once in a pinch, but he's just a straight number 10.

 

 

Yeah I'd be inclined to agree actually, but are we going to put 2 dedicated 10's out of a job to make way for Barrett? (And realistically who would then be promoted?) There have been rumors that Barrett has said that if he earns a starting position (Which I think he has easily done this year) and doesn't get one, he is going to consider his overseas options, which it would be hard not to agree with. Having said that, the AB's are about team first, and Barrett's impact from the bench is undeniable. As good as the Hurricanes have been, I don't think they have had too many battles where they have really had to grind for 60+ minutes to get an opening in the last 10-20 minutes, and I don't really see Barrett in that grind role. Maybe that's wrong or unfair, but it's my impression.

 

 

Why are we putting two dedicated 10's out of a job if Barrett starts?

 

I don't think there's any doubt that Barrett is the form 10 at the moment.  But you don't consider him a 10?  We're only putting one 10 out of a job if Barrett starts and Cruden/Sopoaga are on the bench (personally I hope it's Sopoaga).  All three of them are 10's.

 

If you want to bring one off the pine you drop Barrett back to fullback.

 

Simple.

 

 

The bench is not merely for subs taking the place of unexpected injury.

 

You have 3 backs on the bench to make a big impact to shake the opposition. One of them has to be a half back, that leaves 2.

 

Unfortunately Cruden and Sopoaga neither of them are impact players.

 

 

Presuming you take the 5/3 split, you have a halfback, a first five and a midfielder.  Either one, or preferably both, of the first five/midfielder have to be able to cover an outside back.  For example - subs Perenara, Sopoaga and Moala.  Barrett can drop to the back and provide impact even if he starts at 10.  Moala can play midfield or on the wing.  Smith can play on the wing if Barrett is at fullback.  Sopoaga could play 12 at a push (not that you'd want that)...

 

I'm saying that Barrett can provide impact moving to the back with 20-30 minutes to go.  Clearly I wasn't talking about somebody to replace Barrett if he gets injured, because he will be at fullback (the only time I would move Ben Smith to the wing).

 

I don't believe, with a 5/3 split, that you can afford to take a specialist outside back on the bench.

 

 

 

 


Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606633 8-Aug-2016 22:10
Send private message quote this post

tukapa1:

 

joker97:

 

tukapa1:

 

 

 

Why are we putting two dedicated 10's out of a job if Barrett starts?

 

I don't think there's any doubt that Barrett is the form 10 at the moment.  But you don't consider him a 10?  We're only putting one 10 out of a job if Barrett starts and Cruden/Sopoaga are on the bench (personally I hope it's Sopoaga).  All three of them are 10's.

 

If you want to bring one off the pine you drop Barrett back to fullback.

 

Simple.

 

 

The bench is not merely for subs taking the place of unexpected injury.

 

You have 3 backs on the bench to make a big impact to shake the opposition. One of them has to be a half back, that leaves 2.

 

Unfortunately Cruden and Sopoaga neither of them are impact players.

 

 

Presuming you take the 5/3 split, you have a halfback, a first five and a midfielder.  Either one, or preferably both, of the first five/midfielder have to be able to cover an outside back.  For example - subs Perenara, Sopoaga and Moala.  Barrett can drop to the back and provide impact even if he starts at 10.  Moala can play midfield or on the wing.  Smith can play on the wing if Barrett is at fullback.  Sopoaga could play 12 at a push (not that you'd want that)...

 

I'm saying that Barrett can provide impact moving to the back with 20-30 minutes to go.  Clearly I wasn't talking about somebody to replace Barrett if he gets injured, because he will be at fullback (the only time I would move Ben Smith to the wing).

 

I don't believe, with a 5/3 split, that you can afford to take a specialist outside back on the bench.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The ABs have been doing 5/3 for about a decade, so I don't see them changing.

 

Secondly, I don't know how amazing BB is, but I doubt any normal human can be running around like crazy for 60 minutes and then give impact by switching to fullback. Impact is by definition fresh legs.

 

Look you can come up with whatever line up you want, but I'm saying I think that's how Steve thinks, but I actually don't know how he thinks.




15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606972 9-Aug-2016 13:35
Send private message quote this post

More bad news for Zac Guilford. I really feel for this guy, I hope he can find a way to live with his demons.

 

 

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/82977063/tasman-makos-part-ways-with-winger-zac-guildford

 

 




15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606975 9-Aug-2016 13:38
Send private message quote this post

 

 

 

Why are we putting two dedicated 10's out of a job if Barrett starts?

 

I don't think there's any doubt that Barrett is the form 10 at the moment.  But you don't consider him a 10?  We're only puttng one 10 out of a job if Barrett starts and Cruden/Sopoaga are on the bench (personally I hope it's Sopoaga).  All three of them are 10's.

 

If you want to bring one off the pine you drop Barrett back to fullback.

 

Simple.

 

 

The AB's have not traditionally played 2 specialist 10's in their 23. It's usually specialist 10 to start and utility 10 off the bench, at least for the past quite a number of years. 

 

If Barrett starts then based on that, Soponga and Cruden don't have a place. 

 

I do consider Barrett a 10 (But a utility 10 rather than a specialist 10), and certainly a better 10 than a 15, though he is good in both places. I also think he would be handy on the wing.




15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1606976 9-Aug-2016 13:39
Send private message quote this post

 

 

 

Unfortunately Cruden and Sopoaga neither of them are impact players.

 

 

 

 

Agreed.




15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607003 9-Aug-2016 14:35
Send private message quote this post
Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607122 9-Aug-2016 16:54
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/provincial/82983703/provincial-rugbys-new-laws-get-tentative-thumbs-up-from-coaches

 

 

 

I'll be interested to see a game where these rules are applied. 

 

 

 

 

I need to see an animation. Don't quite get it. sounds the same to me, only different.


Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607124 9-Aug-2016 16:55
Send private message quote this post

Anyone seen the Australia womens' 7s try that supposedly wasn't?

 

I thought it was ok, it left her hand momentarily, but she got to it and slammed it to the ground .... ??




15764 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4273

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607134 9-Aug-2016 17:08
Send private message quote this post

joker97:

 

Anyone seen the Australia womens' 7s try that supposedly wasn't?

 

I thought it was ok, it left her hand momentarily, but she got to it and slammed it to the ground .... ??

 

 

 

 

I'd have disallowed it, even if the shoe had been on the other foot. Australia still won it. We had a brainfart which cost us a player, that was the difference. 

 

 


Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607142 9-Aug-2016 17:22
Send private message quote this post

Ok ignore my post just saw it from a proper angle definitely list forwards. Oops don't trust one angle.

1601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 509

Subscriber

  Reply # 1607238 9-Aug-2016 20:20
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

 

 

 

 

The AB's have not traditionally played 2 specialist 10's in their 23. It's usually specialist 10 to start and utility 10 off the bench, at least for the past quite a number of years. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is 100% incorrect. The All blacks always have two specialist fly halves/goal kickers in their squad - anyone remember Steven Donald in 2011? It's just in the last couple of years that it's been Barrett who has another dimension to his play.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Tri_Nations_Series

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Tri_Nations_Series

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tri_Nations_Series

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Rugby_Championship

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Rugby_Championship

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Rugby_Championship

 

 


Mad Scientist
17840 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2204

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1607240 9-Aug-2016 20:23
Send private message quote this post

 Well, I guess it's up to Hansen to use him as impact or find another suitor ... we'll just have to wait and find out!


1 | ... | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | ... | 203
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43


Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27


2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25


Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28


Vocus Communications wins a place on the TaaS panel
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:16


SwipedOn raises $1 million capital
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:15


Slingshot offers unlimited gigabit fibre for under a ton
Posted 25-Jan-2018 13:51


Spark doubles down on wireless broadband
Posted 24-Jan-2018 15:44



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.