Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | ... | 224
3293 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 540

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1651999 16-Oct-2016 18:13
Send private message quote this post

Oh my goodness. Just watched some highlights of Saturday's games. I saw what I believe to be one of the most blatantly wrong TMO decisions I have seen in a long time.
Wellington's second try against Waikato, referred for a possible forward pass in the lead up to the try. "No clear evidence of a forward pass" was the decision. Was the fact that the receiver was closer to the opposition goal line before the ball even left the passer's hands not an indication that the pass had to be forward? If the ball had been kicked instead of passed the receiver would have been ruled offside, ahead of the kicker. I replayed the action multiple times and there is no doubt about the position of the two players.
Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but if Wellington's position in the semis had been by virtue of scoring a four try bonus point, then other teams could have felt justifiably aggrieved.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.



17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1652845 18-Oct-2016 13:22
Send private message quote this post

I grow increasingly tired of the media in NZ making out there is a systemic issue with player behaviour off-field and more so that it is in some way Rugby's fault. 

 

We have some men behaving badly, who are rugby players. They aren't doing it because they are rugby players. I am unsure why NZ Rugby feels compelled to apologise in any way, and I am horrified to see a panel created to "deal" with it. 

 

The standards for being an All Black have been clear since Father Ted was in charge, and those have no changed, or lessened in any way under Hansen.

 

I am a little surprised by the "leniency" of the Aaron Smith's punishment but at the end of the day it's an employment matter. 

 

Those people who's opinions of the AB's, has been affected negatively aren't the real fans. Real fans can seperate the behaviour of the player off-field from the brand.

 

Was particular galled to see a number of loud-mouthed obnoxious comments from Australia about it when they have enough of their own off-field incidents to write a book about (Kurtley Beale anyone)?

 

 


170 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 1652924 18-Oct-2016 14:35
Send private message quote this post

Dingbatt: Oh my goodness. Just watched some highlights of Saturday's games. I saw what I believe to be one of the most blatantly wrong TMO decisions I have seen in a long time.
Wellington's second try against Waikato, referred for a possible forward pass in the lead up to the try. "No clear evidence of a forward pass" was the decision. Was the fact that the receiver was closer to the opposition goal line before the ball even left the passer's hands not an indication that the pass had to be forward? If the ball had been kicked instead of passed the receiver would have been ruled offside, ahead of the kicker. I replayed the action multiple times and there is no doubt about the position of the two players.
Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but if Wellington's position in the semis had been by virtue of scoring a four try bonus point, then other teams could have felt justifiably aggrieved.

 

 

 

I have not seen the specific incident in question, but as explained here as long as the movement of the passers hands was backwards, the receiver being in front of the passer does not constitute a forward pass. often if a player is tackled right as they are passing the pass can appear to be 'blatantly' forward when in reality it is a perfectly legal pass.

 

 

 

 




17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1653021 18-Oct-2016 15:54
Send private message quote this post

lagbort:

 

Dingbatt: Oh my goodness. Just watched some highlights of Saturday's games. I saw what I believe to be one of the most blatantly wrong TMO decisions I have seen in a long time.
Wellington's second try against Waikato, referred for a possible forward pass in the lead up to the try. "No clear evidence of a forward pass" was the decision. Was the fact that the receiver was closer to the opposition goal line before the ball even left the passer's hands not an indication that the pass had to be forward? If the ball had been kicked instead of passed the receiver would have been ruled offside, ahead of the kicker. I replayed the action multiple times and there is no doubt about the position of the two players.
Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but if Wellington's position in the semis had been by virtue of scoring a four try bonus point, then other teams could have felt justifiably aggrieved.

 

 

 

I have not seen the specific incident in question, but as explained here as long as the movement of the passers hands was backwards, the receiver being in front of the passer does not constitute a forward pass. often if a player is tackled right as they are passing the pass can appear to be 'blatantly' forward when in reality it is a perfectly legal pass.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yup, so it's important to watch the ball as it leaves the hands of the first player, if the ball LEAVES the hands backward but TRAVELS forward, it's ok. 

 

Having said that, I am trying to imagine what it would take for it not to be a forward pass if the receiver is in front of the passer at the time of the pass. 

 

 


170 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 37


  Reply # 1653023 18-Oct-2016 15:56
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

lagbort:

 

Dingbatt: Oh my goodness. Just watched some highlights of Saturday's games. I saw what I believe to be one of the most blatantly wrong TMO decisions I have seen in a long time.
Wellington's second try against Waikato, referred for a possible forward pass in the lead up to the try. "No clear evidence of a forward pass" was the decision. Was the fact that the receiver was closer to the opposition goal line before the ball even left the passer's hands not an indication that the pass had to be forward? If the ball had been kicked instead of passed the receiver would have been ruled offside, ahead of the kicker. I replayed the action multiple times and there is no doubt about the position of the two players.
Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but if Wellington's position in the semis had been by virtue of scoring a four try bonus point, then other teams could have felt justifiably aggrieved.

 

 

 

I have not seen the specific incident in question, but as explained here as long as the movement of the passers hands was backwards, the receiver being in front of the passer does not constitute a forward pass. often if a player is tackled right as they are passing the pass can appear to be 'blatantly' forward when in reality it is a perfectly legal pass.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yup, so it's important to watch the ball as it leaves the hands of the first player, if the ball LEAVES the hands backward but TRAVELS forward, it's ok. 

 

Having said that, I am trying to imagine what it would take for it not to be a forward pass if the receiver is in front of the passer at the time of the pass. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

if the passer was running full tilt and the receiver was standing still or jogging, the passer could be behind the receiver at the time the ball was released and still perform a legal pass.




17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1653031 18-Oct-2016 16:03
Send private message quote this post

lagbort:

 

networkn:

 

lagbort:

 

Dingbatt: Oh my goodness. Just watched some highlights of Saturday's games. I saw what I believe to be one of the most blatantly wrong TMO decisions I have seen in a long time.
Wellington's second try against Waikato, referred for a possible forward pass in the lead up to the try. "No clear evidence of a forward pass" was the decision. Was the fact that the receiver was closer to the opposition goal line before the ball even left the passer's hands not an indication that the pass had to be forward? If the ball had been kicked instead of passed the receiver would have been ruled offside, ahead of the kicker. I replayed the action multiple times and there is no doubt about the position of the two players.
Didn't affect the outcome of the game, but if Wellington's position in the semis had been by virtue of scoring a four try bonus point, then other teams could have felt justifiably aggrieved.

 

 

 

I have not seen the specific incident in question, but as explained here as long as the movement of the passers hands was backwards, the receiver being in front of the passer does not constitute a forward pass. often if a player is tackled right as they are passing the pass can appear to be 'blatantly' forward when in reality it is a perfectly legal pass.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yup, so it's important to watch the ball as it leaves the hands of the first player, if the ball LEAVES the hands backward but TRAVELS forward, it's ok. 

 

Having said that, I am trying to imagine what it would take for it not to be a forward pass if the receiver is in front of the passer at the time of the pass. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

if the passer was running full tilt and the receiver was standing still or jogging, the passer could be behind the receiver at the time the ball was released and still perform a legal pass.

 

 

 

 

Allblacks.com has all the highlights (free with registration), I just watched it and I'm with Dingbatt, looks forward to me. Normally Nisbett will make a comment like "looks forward, but play continues" or "That's an extremely flat pass" but nothing from him about it. 

 

Certainly isn't the speed required. It was essentially offloaded in the tackle, he almost seems to fling it away from his chest.

 

 

 

 


3293 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 540

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1653070 18-Oct-2016 16:49
Send private message quote this post

Yes. Just to clarify. Not a flowing backline move where the forward momentum of the players means the ball is received forward of a line from where it was released. @lagbort, I understand the 'backwards or of the hands' interpretation. But in this case the receiver was closer to the goal line before the pass was thrown. Offside at the least.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.



17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1655734 21-Oct-2016 14:15
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Please let this be the AB's test that we show as a country we have grown up and feel secure enough in our team and our success that we don't boo Quade Cooper every time he touches the ball (or for any other player too). 

 

Also, please let this be the test that we show kickers the respect they deserve, but letting them put their best attempt over without catcalls and booing as well. 

 

 


1558 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 352


  Reply # 1655750 21-Oct-2016 14:27
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

Please let this be the AB's test that we show as a country we have grown up and feel secure enough in our team and our success that we don't boo Quade Cooper every time he touches the ball (or for any other player too). 

 

Also, please let this be the test that we show kickers the respect they deserve, but letting them put their best attempt over without catcalls and booing as well.

 

 

 

 

And, while we're at our optimistic best, please let there be world peace too.




17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1655752 21-Oct-2016 14:28
Send private message quote this post

Hammerer:

 

networkn:

 

Please let this be the AB's test that we show as a country we have grown up and feel secure enough in our team and our success that we don't boo Quade Cooper every time he touches the ball (or for any other player too). 

 

Also, please let this be the test that we show kickers the respect they deserve, but letting them put their best attempt over without catcalls and booing as well.

 

 

 

 

And, while we're at our optimistic best, please let there be world peace too.

 

 

 

 

Seems I am the only one who thinks there is even a tiny chance of an upset this weekend. I am desperately hoping we can win, it would be nice to see this final hurdle, but I do feel Australia can upset us, if we try and be too clever. 

 

I am concerned about Hooper and Pocock, and Speight as well. Even their selected 12 is a reasonable choice. 

 

 


534 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1655753 21-Oct-2016 14:35
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

Please let this be the AB's test that we show as a country we have grown up and feel secure enough in our team and our success that we don't boo Quade Cooper every time he touches the ball (or for any other player too). 

 

Also, please let this be the test that we show kickers the respect they deserve, but letting them put their best attempt over without catcalls and booing as well. 

 

 

 

 

Agreed

 

Especially now as he will be coming off the bench. I got the hate in the first game against us after the perceived slight / knee to McCaws head, but let it go. People seem to be doing it out of fun / joke rather than actual hate, but it doesn't come across as that. 




17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1655754 21-Oct-2016 14:39
Send private message quote this post

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

Please let this be the AB's test that we show as a country we have grown up and feel secure enough in our team and our success that we don't boo Quade Cooper every time he touches the ball (or for any other player too). 

 

Also, please let this be the test that we show kickers the respect they deserve, but letting them put their best attempt over without catcalls and booing as well. 

 

 

 

 

Agreed

 

Especially now as he will be coming off the bench. I got the hate in the first game against us after the perceived slight / knee to McCaws head, but let it go. People seem to be doing it out of fun / joke rather than actual hate, but it doesn't come across as that. 

 

 

 

 

Sometimes I feel (as a nation) we don't deserve or behave in a way that befits fans of best team in the world. The same things that indicate to us that it's ok to boo another team, are same issues that stop us being truly great in other areas.

 

 


1586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Subscriber

  Reply # 1655786 21-Oct-2016 15:15
Send private message quote this post

Oh please - it happens everywhere in sport, look at Kyrgios.  You reap what you sow, and its less about growing up as a nation and more about being a smart international player.  Coopers biggest issue is that because he is disliked everytime he makes a mistake people love that, but it affects his game big time.  Then the media beat it up throughout the week, and pile on the pressure and he fails.  Thats sport, if he had not done those things to the AB's [and it wasnt percieved, and it wasnt only once] he would not have an issue coming to NZ. Lump it Cooper, karmas a bitch

 

 

 

PS coming out on twitter and saying you are NZ public enemy number 1... cool




17118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4854

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1655787 21-Oct-2016 15:18
Send private message quote this post

itxtme:

 

Oh please - it happens everywhere in sport, look at Kyrgios.  You reap what you sow, and its less about growing up as a nation and more about being a smart international player.  Coopers biggest issue is that because he is disliked everytime he makes a mistake people love that, but it affects his game big time.  Then the media beat it up throughout the week, and pile on the pressure and he fails.  Thats sport, if he had not done those things to the AB's [and it wasnt percieved, and it wasnt only once] he would not have an issue coming to NZ. Lump it Cooper, karmas a bitch

 

 

 

PS coming out on twitter and saying you are NZ public enemy number 1... cool

 

 

 

 

Obviously, you don't believe in letting sleeping dogs lie, being the bigger man, or showing class?  Just stick the boot in?

 

If we are as good as we think we are, QC having a good game shouldn't be the difference. 

 

I always teach my son that it's important to be a good loser, but it's MORE important to be a good winner.


1586 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 259

Subscriber

  Reply # 1655814 21-Oct-2016 15:52
Send private message quote this post

You are missing my point, its not me yelling at him.  What I think personally is irrelevant.  He wasn't smart on multiple occasions, and now this is his NZ reality


1 | ... | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | ... | 224
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.