Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | ... | 202


15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1756252 4-Apr-2017 12:28
Send private message quote this post

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

Any rule against you sliding in front of a player moving to the try line, so you effectively arrive parallel but in front of the line? Basically so you block the try being scored without tackling the player?

 

 

 

 

In what regard? Why would you not want to tackle the player, is it due to being in an offside position?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tackling a player may not result in being able to stop him scoring, but blocking his path to the try line esp if he is also going low....

 

 

 

Just musing, not really too worried either way.


531 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1756284 4-Apr-2017 13:15
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

Any rule against you sliding in front of a player moving to the try line, so you effectively arrive parallel but in front of the line? Basically so you block the try being scored without tackling the player?

 

 

 

 

In what regard? Why would you not want to tackle the player, is it due to being in an offside position?

 

  

 

 

 Tackling a player may not result in being able to stop him scoring, but blocking his path to the try line esp if he is also going low....

 

 

 

Just musing, not really too worried either way.

 

 

Suspect the momentum of the player would push the 'tackler' over the line if going low. There is also the safety aspect of going in potentially feet first, a la Billy Slater in the league (which is why they banned it - not sure if there is a similar rule in union.)

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 


1674 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 72


  Reply # 1756297 4-Apr-2017 13:25
Send private message quote this post

JonnyCam:

 

Suspect the momentum of the player would push the 'tackler' over the line if going low. There is also the safety aspect of going in potentially feet first, a la Billy Slater in the league (which is why they banned it - not sure if there is a similar rule in union.)

 

 

 

That would be my first guess too, given Refs being the cynical creatures they are and if he calls it no try ......

 

But I thought leading with the feet was banned in Union as well?

 

But hey still doesnt stop Silly Slater from doing it. I think its a bad habit. Bit like how Matt Ridge use to always put his head on the wrong side of a tackle.


169 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1756303 4-Apr-2017 13:27
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

JonnyCam:

 

networkn:

 

Any rule against you sliding in front of a player moving to the try line, so you effectively arrive parallel but in front of the line? Basically so you block the try being scored without tackling the player?

 

 

 

 

In what regard? Why would you not want to tackle the player, is it due to being in an offside position?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tackling a player may not result in being able to stop him scoring, but blocking his path to the try line esp if he is also going low....

 

 

 

Just musing, not really too worried either way.

 

 

 

 

As long as you slid head first towards the player and didn't do something silly like sliding a shoulder into their face I can't see why there would be any issue. I can't find any laws that would disallow "Defensive Obstruction" so as long as you didn't break any other laws in the process you should be fine.




15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1756319 4-Apr-2017 13:46
Send private message quote this post

lagbort:

 

 

 

 

 

As long as you slid head first towards the player and didn't do something silly like sliding a shoulder into their face I can't see why there would be any issue. I can't find any laws that would disallow "Defensive Obstruction" so as long as you didn't break any other laws in the process you should be fine.

 

 

Yeah, I think that was how I imagined it. 




15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1756641 4-Apr-2017 21:29
Send private message quote this post

Toulouse v Munster, Munster gave them a hiding in the quarters. 

 

A few significant plays by ex Kiwi players, esp Tyler Bylandaal (ex Crusaders).

 

Highlights worth a watch, even if to just watch the different style of play to Southern teams like NZ. 

 

It would be most interesting to see how the winner of this competion fared against the Hurricanes, or Crusaders, or Highlanders.


3086 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 447

Subscriber

  Reply # 1759265 7-Apr-2017 21:32
Send private message quote this post

Hurricanes hung in well there in the end after blowing the Warratahs off the park in the first 12 minutes. I was annoyed by Barrett's first yellow card, it was more like a failed attempt at an intercept than a deliberate knock down. If there was an example of a deliberate knock down it was his second yellow! At the same time as the first yellow, two pieces of foul play that should have led to yellows, no arms tackle off the ball on Jordie Barrett, that led to a concussion test (penalty only) and the elbow to the throat of Jane (unpunished).




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

1529 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Subscriber

  Reply # 1759277 7-Apr-2017 22:01
Send private message quote this post

^ Agreed on all points.  I was miffed with the first yellow, this is an ongoing issue in super rugby, a real lack of consistency.  The ref is doing himself no favours by refusing to go upstairs and check, but it seemed he was consistent in failing to do this all game (go figure). 




15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1759278 7-Apr-2017 22:02
Send private message quote this post

Can't really agree with that. It wasn't a knockdown, but it was interference of what was a very likely scoring opportunities (1st one). He had no real chance of securing the ball, so even though he made it look like he was going for the ball it was never going to happen.

 

The second absolutely should have been a penalty try. I have no problem with the red card decision, both were cynical. He is way too classy to play those sort of tactics. 

 

The No Arms tackle and leading with the elbow, I agree with, should have been looked at.

 

 


3086 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 447

Subscriber

  Reply # 1759322 8-Apr-2017 07:40
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

But then any intercept is interference in a potential scoring move, isn't it? I rewatched the first one multiple times, and in my opinion, there was a genuine attempt to catch the ball. While constant referrals to the TMO become a blight on the flow of the game, for something that impacts the game as markedly as a yellow card, I believe they are essential.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

169 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 35


  Reply # 1759324 8-Apr-2017 08:01
Send private message quote this post

Dingbatt: But then any intercept is interference in a potential scoring move, isn't it? I rewatched the first one multiple times, and in my opinion, there was a genuine attempt to catch the ball. While constant referrals to the TMO become a blight on the flow of the game, for something that impacts the game as markedly as a yellow card, I believe they are essential.


Just watched the replay now, the second one was fair enough but that first yellow was an absolute travesty. How could it have been any more of a genuine effort without actually catching it?

1320 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 294

Subscriber

  Reply # 1759594 8-Apr-2017 21:17
Send private message quote this post

Why has SBW taped over the BNZ logo on his collar?





Life is too short to remove USB safely.


3086 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 447

Subscriber

  Reply # 1759610 8-Apr-2017 21:35
Send private message quote this post

Did someone spike the Blue's Gatorade at half-time?






Again.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.



15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1759619 8-Apr-2017 22:55
Send private message quote this post

Pulu is a good runner, has pretty good vision, but his distribution from the base of the ruck is too slow. Passes between players at the Blues is too high, they lose their forward momentum which allows teams to crowd them on defense, then they lack the maturity and composure to reset well enough.  They are extremely prone to passing instead of taking contact.

 

Pulu is taking an extra step. He needs to just pass. It's throwing the entire blues line out of sync time and time again. 

 

 




15315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1759621 8-Apr-2017 23:00
Send private message quote this post

kiwifidget:

 

Why has SBW taped over the BNZ logo on his collar?

 

 

Religious Beliefs. BNZ have said they are ok with it. 

 

 


1 | ... | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 167 | 168 | ... | 202
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52


NOW to deploy SD-WAN to regional councils
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:46


Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.