Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | ... | 216


16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407645 16-Oct-2015 10:07
Send private message quote this post

blair003:
networkn:
Smithy100: Glad to see NMS in ahead of Naholo - didn't really expect differently though you just never know! Surprised to see TKB ahead of TJP, though upon reflection his form has been flat since the S15... also interesting to see Moody straight onto the bench.

Looking forward to a great game - and all the bacon!


Didn't see they had announced the team. Considering TKB's form it is a complete mystery how is he @ RWC at all, and nothing I've seen since has indicated to me he should be played in a knockout match, but maybe he's been "holding back".



The fact they picked him when he hadn't played any rugby should tell you something about how the best rugby brains in NZ see him.

His form is on the improve as he gets more game time. He has certainly lacked game time, but if they can't count on him to play in this game then he wouldn't have been picked for the squad.


I guess I wasn't that impressed during Super Rugby time either! TJP WAS impressive, and so it was very clear he was the deservedly second choice to AS. I guess they are looking long term, and possibly looking at very specific things I am not seeing because I am not sure what to look for.

At the end of the day I have put my trust in SH, he has earned the trust he has been given, over and over, but I hope this doesn't end up another Naholo. (Comparatively Brad Weber has been playing very well (In case you think my comments are anti Waikato bias).

Mad Scientist
18270 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2312

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407648 16-Oct-2015 10:10
Send private message quote this post

blair003:
joker97: If (and i don't think that's the sole reason) everything bring equal they have 2 backup goal kickers. In the past dagg would be goal kicker no 3 but tkb now holds that role.


For the game vs Georgia we picked both TKB and TJP on the bench, but TJP was picked because he was the backup goalkicker (after DC, in the absence of Slade and Barrett). I don't think TKB kicks goals? In that game, it was TKB that came on for the final 10 minutes at halfback, so we shouldn't be surprised he had the inside running at halfback now.


As usual the starting 15 for solidity, the bench for impact. There is a plan for each of the 8 impact players.

 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software


16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407649 16-Oct-2015 10:10
Send private message quote this post

blair003:
joker97: If (and i don't think that's the sole reason) everything bring equal they have 2 backup goal kickers. In the past dagg would be goal kicker no 3 but tkb now holds that role.


For the game vs Georgia we picked both TKB and TJP on the bench, but TJP was picked because he was the backup goalkicker (after DC, in the absence of Slade and Barrett). I don't think TKB kicks goals? In that game, it was TKB that came on for the final 10 minutes at halfback, so we shouldn't be surprised he had the inside running at halfback now.


The thing that has concerned me about TJP, is he is pretty inconsistent. He was dropped by the AB's because he couldn't replicate his SR under pressure of test rugby, and reintroduced when he got his form back in the last SR season. I suspect if he has been overlooked now, his test career is done, as there are actually reasonable
stocks of decent 9's in the country.



16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407651 16-Oct-2015 10:14
Send private message quote this post

To confirm there is no end of year tour this year? Last game is October is the last NZ International Rugby in 2015?


547 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1407652 16-Oct-2015 10:17
Send private message quote this post

networkn:
blair003:
networkn:
Smithy100: Glad to see NMS in ahead of Naholo - didn't really expect differently though you just never know! Surprised to see TKB ahead of TJP, though upon reflection his form has been flat since the S15... also interesting to see Moody straight onto the bench.

Looking forward to a great game - and all the bacon!


Didn't see they had announced the team. Considering TKB's form it is a complete mystery how is he @ RWC at all, and nothing I've seen since has indicated to me he should be played in a knockout match, but maybe he's been "holding back".



The fact they picked him when he hadn't played any rugby should tell you something about how the best rugby brains in NZ see him.

His form is on the improve as he gets more game time. He has certainly lacked game time, but if they can't count on him to play in this game then he wouldn't have been picked for the squad.


I guess I wasn't that impressed during Super Rugby time either! TJP WAS impressive, and so it was very clear he was the deservedly second choice to AS. I guess they are looking long term, and possibly looking at very specific things I am not seeing because I am not sure what to look for.

At the end of the day I have put my trust in SH, he has earned the trust he has been given, over and over, but I hope this doesn't end up another Naholo. (Comparatively Brad Weber has been playing very well (In case you think my comments are anti Waikato bias).


IIRC he didn't play super rugby, probably why you were not impressed. He was second choice AB halfback before his injury last year in October (playing for the AB's). He has only returned this year in July, and has lacked game time since then for sure.

547 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1407666 16-Oct-2015 10:25
Send private message quote this post

Also regarding "another Naholo", you're acting like it was a bad decision and to take someone else and let Naholo move to France (as was going to happen) would have been a better decision.

I disagree. Just because they didn't get the best out of him in the limited game time he had doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

TKB was the second choice halfback and under this regime you don't lose your place in the pecking order due to injury.

1581 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 253

Subscriber

  Reply # 1407677 16-Oct-2015 10:34
Send private message quote this post

blair003: Also regarding "another Naholo", you're acting like it was a bad decision and to take someone else and let Naholo move to France (as was going to happen) would have been a better decision.

I disagree. Just because they didn't get the best out of him in the limited game time he had doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

TKB was the second choice halfback and under this regime you don't lose your place in the pecking order due to injury.


Agreed, its a plan that has worked very well.  Take two in-form bolters, knowing there is only room in the starting team for one.  From those two pick the best (NMS it seems).  Its worked well, NMS or Naholo (particularly) were never going to be bench players, so one was always going to miss out.



16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407697 16-Oct-2015 10:52
Send private message quote this post

blair003: Also regarding "another Naholo", you're acting like it was a bad decision and to take someone else and let Naholo move to France (as was going to happen) would have been a better decision.

I disagree. Just because they didn't get the best out of him in the limited game time he had doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

TKB was the second choice halfback and under this regime you don't lose your place in the pecking order due to injury.


Not sure if I think it was a "bad" decision, but it was fairly risky, taking into account his injury. That risk hasn't paid off with Naholo this time.

Same of TKB, (and yes I understand the not missing out due to injury), I don't think he is back at his best BECAUSE of his injury, which has resulted in no game time (Yes I was mistaken about him not playing SR this year it would seem).  You will have seen how long leg injuries take to heal, not
just the injury itself, but the confidence to rely on the limb. 

I think the two factor thing, esp in a world cup where expectations are so high and it takes us as a country 4-8 years to get over losing one, should have resulted in both those players staying at home, playing ITM, or what not, and been considered for the AB's in 2016. (and yes I do understand that Naholo was due to go to France).

Having said that, I sincerely hope I am incorrect about TKB (I have nothing personal against the guy obviously) and I hope he plays the leather off the ball.







16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407701 16-Oct-2015 10:54
Send private message quote this post

itxtme:
blair003: Also regarding "another Naholo", you're acting like it was a bad decision and to take someone else and let Naholo move to France (as was going to happen) would have been a better decision.

I disagree. Just because they didn't get the best out of him in the limited game time he had doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

TKB was the second choice halfback and under this regime you don't lose your place in the pecking order due to injury.


Agreed, its a plan that has worked very well.  Take two in-form bolters, knowing there is only room in the starting team for one.  From those two pick the best (NMS it seems).  Its worked well, NMS or Naholo (particularly) were never going to be bench players, so one was always going to miss out.


I don't agree it's worked "well". Surely the ideal situation, is you take two "in form bolters" and they both play like men possessed, you lose sleep over who will miss out, and you make a decision based on which "in form at rwc" player gets to start based on their skills and how they will best compete and against THIS weeks opponent.


1581 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 253

Subscriber

  Reply # 1407711 16-Oct-2015 11:06
Send private message quote this post

Nope thats the "optimal" situation.  Risk and reward, its worked well.  our starting lineup and reserves is a very strong in-form team.



16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407732 16-Oct-2015 11:07
Send private message quote this post

itxtme: Nope thats the "optimal" situation.  Risk and reward, its worked well.  our starting lineup and reserves is a very strong in-form team.


If NMS gets injured, then we move BS to Wing, Barrett to FB? Slade as backup to DC?


547 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1407735 16-Oct-2015 11:13
Send private message quote this post

networkn:
itxtme: Nope thats the "optimal" situation.  Risk and reward, its worked well.  our starting lineup and reserves is a very strong in-form team.


If NMS gets injured, then we move BS to Wing, Barrett to FB? Slade as backup to DC?



Would be interesting. If the rest of the back line is performing, I think they would just bring in Naholo for NMS and back him to perform. If for example DC had been under pressure/under performing they may rearrange the back line to bring in Barrett so they have a second play maker.



16925 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4761

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407739 16-Oct-2015 11:18
Send private message quote this post

blair003:
networkn:
itxtme: Nope thats the "optimal" situation.  Risk and reward, its worked well.  our starting lineup and reserves is a very strong in-form team.


If NMS gets injured, then we move BS to Wing, Barrett to FB? Slade as backup to DC?



Would be interesting. If the rest of the back line is performing, I think they would just bring in Naholo for NMS and back him to perform. If for example DC had been under pressure/under performing they may rearrange the back line to bring in Barrett so they have a second play maker.


See this is what I mean, it's created a conundrum that doesn't happen, if you don't potentially have 2 players, in the squad underperforming, due to prior or ongoing injury. I don't see 2 "in form but injured" , or "previously inform and recovering from injury", players being the smart move.

I guess at the end of the day, let's hope no-one gets injured, or that perhaps Naholo finds international form if the worst occurs, I guess we will find out. 

I am actually less worried about this, than I may actually seem, as I am less worried about the RWC than some, to me, it's far more important we are #1 the rest of the 4 years, but I'd still LOVE to win it.

Even if we lose on Sunday, I won't be calling for Hansen's head.

Mad Scientist
18270 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2312

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1407750 16-Oct-2015 11:27
Send private message quote this post

networkn:
itxtme:
blair003: Also regarding "another Naholo", you're acting like it was a bad decision and to take someone else and let Naholo move to France (as was going to happen) would have been a better decision.

I disagree. Just because they didn't get the best out of him in the limited game time he had doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

TKB was the second choice halfback and under this regime you don't lose your place in the pecking order due to injury.


Agreed, its a plan that has worked very well.  Take two in-form bolters, knowing there is only room in the starting team for one.  From those two pick the best (NMS it seems).  Its worked well, NMS or Naholo (particularly) were never going to be bench players, so one was always going to miss out.


I don't agree it's worked "well". Surely the ideal situation, is you take two "in form bolters" and they both play like men possessed, you lose sleep over who will miss out, and you make a decision based on which "in form at rwc" player gets to start based on their skills and how they will best compete and against THIS weeks opponent.



I think you are barking up the wrong tree. I think the problem is not the back up 9, but the starting 10. Hasn't shown how good he is under pressure. If course it's my opinion, and happy to be proven wrong.

547 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 19


  Reply # 1407753 16-Oct-2015 11:28
Send private message quote this post

networkn:
blair003:
networkn:
itxtme: Nope thats the "optimal" situation.  Risk and reward, its worked well.  our starting lineup and reserves is a very strong in-form team.


If NMS gets injured, then we move BS to Wing, Barrett to FB? Slade as backup to DC?



Would be interesting. If the rest of the back line is performing, I think they would just bring in Naholo for NMS and back him to perform. If for example DC had been under pressure/under performing they may rearrange the back line to bring in Barrett so they have a second play maker.


See this is what I mean, it's created a conundrum that doesn't happen, if you don't potentially have 2 players, in the squad underperforming, due to prior or ongoing injury. I don't see 2 "in form but injured" , or "previously inform and recovering from injury", players being the smart move.

I guess at the end of the day, let's hope no-one gets injured, or that perhaps Naholo finds international form if the worst occurs, I guess we will find out. 

I am actually less worried about this, than I may actually seem, as I am less worried about the RWC than some, to me, it's far more important we are #1 the rest of the 4 years, but I'd still LOVE to win it.

Even if we lose on Sunday, I won't be calling for Hansen's head.



I think your expectations are too high. Naholo has been around for 5 minutes. He has bombed a try and scored a try nobody else in our team would have. He has not been tidy enough and was bundled into touch when he shouldn't have been. They haven't given him the space that they have given NMS, they have used him more in close a la Savea. Remember NMS bombed an easier try than the Naholo drop ball, and had you judged him on his performance in that game you would say hes not good enough and shouldn't have been selected.

Currently we have many players under performing - Read and Savea being the two most obvious examples. You are focusing on Naholo and TKB because you think it is their injuries causing them issues and therefore that is reason for them not to have been selected. Who cares why players are under performing? Is Read under performing because of earlier concussions? Should we have left him at home?

1 | ... | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | ... | 216
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41


Exhibition to showcase digital artwork from across the globe
Posted 23-May-2018 16:44


Auckland tops list of most vulnerable cities in a zombie apocalypse
Posted 23-May-2018 12:52


ASB first bank in New Zealand to step out with Garmin Pay
Posted 23-May-2018 00:10


Umbrellar becomes Microsoft Cloud Solution Provider
Posted 22-May-2018 15:43


Three New Zealand projects shortlisted in IDC Asia Pacific Smart Cities Awards
Posted 22-May-2018 15:14


UpStarters - the New Zealand tech and innovation story
Posted 21-May-2018 09:55


Lightbox updates platform with new streaming options
Posted 17-May-2018 13:09


Norton Core router launches with high-performance, IoT security in New Zealand
Posted 16-May-2018 02:00


D-Link ANZ launches new 4G LTE Dual SIM M2M VPN Router
Posted 15-May-2018 19:30


New Panasonic LUMIX FT7 ideal for outdoor: waterproof, dustproof
Posted 15-May-2018 19:17


Ryanair Goes All-In on AWS
Posted 15-May-2018 19:14


Te Papa and EQC Minecraft Mod shakes up earthquake education
Posted 15-May-2018 19:12



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.