Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

ojo

97 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 10


  Reply # 1268342 26-Mar-2015 12:03
Send private message

Will it actually be live the whole way through, or will they pause it intermittently for ad breaks a la their Olympics coverage?



joker97: maybe they are protecting the HD sport by not havin HD channel? who knows


There is minimal sport on the channel, so I doubt that's the reason. The bulk of their programming screens nowhere else. It just looks like they're unwilling to fork out the million (or whatever it is) per year fee for HD. Mediaworks are the same with Four.

14447 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1897


  Reply # 1268354 26-Mar-2015 12:20
Send private message

ojo: Will it actually be live the whole way through, or will they pause it intermittently for ad breaks a la their Olympics coverage?



joker97: maybe they are protecting the HD sport by not havin HD channel? who knows


There is minimal sport on the channel, so I doubt that's the reason. The bulk of their programming screens nowhere else. It just looks like they're unwilling to fork out the million (or whatever it is) per year fee for HD. Mediaworks are the same with Four.


But many people don't have sky, so  those that do watch prime have to watch it i SD, so Prime will likely want a point of difference between their Paytv HD content and the channel they provide free. People watching cricket in SD may say, I wish this was in HD, I want to buy sky so I can get it in HD.

Not exactly related, but I have noticed that NZs ondemand channels, such as TVNZs ondemand are all in SD or lower quality. However some of their advertising is now in HD. SO I wonder if these FTA channels are buying SD rights only for some broadcast mediums. eg Primes content maybe in SD, because they are only buying SD rights.

 
 
 
 


13828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2512

Trusted

  Reply # 1268870 27-Mar-2015 10:08
One person supports this post
Send private message

Right, what chnace do we have to win?

I watched most of the game last night. Oz was very good, but not great, lost wickets so are vulnerable to good bowling. Their RR to what was going to be well over 350 slid dramatically. India was very tame, so the win by Oz was flattered by India's delay to attack the death, they left that to when they needed 14 per over, strange

So, despite my kiwi bias, I do feel there is more than an outside chance for us. My odds are Oz 1-60  NZ 2-20 maybe closer   Forget the past record, this side is unlike most others in terms of playing aggressive. Ignore the MCG, so what it is bigger, there are WAY more gaps. 6's and 4's will be less, 2's and 3's will be more. Lastly, i think we have the brain to win. No real pressure as if we play passive we automaticalkly lose, so we wont be honourable losers we will play to get the runs. Oz will have to stop us, we wont be stopping ourselves

Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1268918 27-Mar-2015 11:00
Send private message

on paper, they have more formidable batsmen, we have more explosive ones. their middle and bottom orders are superior.

on paper they have stronger bowlers.

on paper i rate them as favourites.

key to NZ win?
if we are to chase, for our top bowlers to take wickets. for our other bowlers to bowl the game of their lives.
if we bat first, for our top order to hang in there and have lots of wickets in hand at the end. 

this is not going to be an Eden Park repeat




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1268921 27-Mar-2015 11:03
One person supports this post
Send private message

of course i hope i'm wrong and we knock them out of the park 




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


13828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2512

Trusted

  Reply # 1268928 27-Mar-2015 11:14
Send private message

joker97: on paper, they have more formidable batsmen, we have more explosive ones. their middle and bottom orders are superior.

Ive not been that imprerssed by their batsmen. They lost them all at Eden park, as did we, due to the strengths of the bowlers that day. They looked really good last night then lost wickets regularly and the batting slid. They dont have much of a tail, but nor do we.

on paper they have stronger bowlers.

Stats in CWC15 doesnt show that? They have faster bowlers, but no spinners of note, and like us, one key bowler. Not a lot there to seperate

on paper i rate them as favourites.

Sure, so do I.

key to NZ win?
if we are to chase, for our top bowlers to take wickets. for our other bowlers to bowl the game of their lives.
if we bat first, for our top order to hang in there and have lots of wickets in hand at the end. 

this is not going to be an Eden Park repeat


Typically the AUS vs NZ cricket at MCG is a gift to them. But this team of ours bears no resemblence to the standard kiwi black caps team of any past era. Thats really the key, this is our best team ever in many ways, the Oz team is the standard top notch Oz team but not their greatest


1715 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 833


  Reply # 1268947 27-Mar-2015 11:42
Send private message

joker97: ..

key to NZ win?
if we are to chase, for our top bowlers to take wickets. for our other bowlers to bowl the game of their lives.
if we bat first, for our top order to hang in there and have lots of wickets in hand at the end. 

...


Floyd's key to NZ win:
* get Warner and Maxwell cheaply
* treat Starc with respect




Most of the trouble in the world is caused by people wanting to be important. (T.S. Eliot)


Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1268973 27-Mar-2015 11:59
Send private message

yes, but their team is deeper than those 3 guys ... unfortunately!

bring on Sunday! should be a cracker!




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


13828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2512

Trusted

  Reply # 1268976 27-Mar-2015 12:02
Send private message

joker97: yes, but their team is deeper than those 3 guys ... unfortunately!

bring on Sunday! should be a cracker!


We got depth too, almost no tail.  But bout time they all fired and not just one or two.

Yep it will eb a cracker and close as we arent scared. Back in the day we were always scared and were mostly scared into submission. Not any more

Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1272588 28-Mar-2015 21:30
Send private message

You mean we have no Chris Martin :D

Anyway, Brendon McCallum declares he will not change the way he plays. That will translate to - Australia will target him, thinking he's easy meat.

Meaning: our success could depend on how many he gets before he gets caught, and after that, Guptill and Kane need to steady the ship ... either for a good score or to chase successfully.

I need to look at what he averages in T20 ... it will be a cracker!

On that note, maybe we need a "Sports" section in GZ ...




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1273351 30-Mar-2015 12:21
Send private message

joker97: You mean we have no Chris Martin :D

Anyway, Brendon McCallum declares he will not change the way he plays. That will translate to - Australia will target him, thinking he's easy meat.

Meaning: our success could depend on how many he gets before he gets caught, and after that, Guptill and Kane need to steady the ship ... either for a good score or to chase successfully.

I need to look at what he averages in T20 ... it will be a cracker!

On that note, maybe we need a "Sports" section in GZ ...


Live by the sword, DIE by the sword.

My only wish for if Big Mac used a few brain cells!




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


1186 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 149


  Reply # 1273409 30-Mar-2015 13:47
Send private message

chokers !!!

tongue-out

Banana?
4511 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1080

Subscriber

  Reply # 1273411 30-Mar-2015 13:51
Send private message

joker97:
joker97: You mean we have no Chris Martin :D

Anyway, Brendon McCallum declares he will not change the way he plays. That will translate to - Australia will target him, thinking he's easy meat.

Meaning: our success could depend on how many he gets before he gets caught, and after that, Guptill and Kane need to steady the ship ... either for a good score or to chase successfully.

I need to look at what he averages in T20 ... it will be a cracker!

On that note, maybe we need a "Sports" section in GZ ...


Live by the sword, DIE by the sword.

My only wish for if Big Mac used a few brain cells!


It would have been a good toss to lose.

I think if we had chased, they would have know what they had to do, and would have seen that the pitch held no real demons apart from a good bit of swing in the first 8 or so overs.

We lost all our 'power' hitters for Zero runs (Bmac, Corey and Luke Ronchi).

13828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2512

Trusted

  Reply # 1273412 30-Mar-2015 13:59
Send private message

trig42:
joker97:
joker97: You mean we have no Chris Martin :D

Anyway, Brendon McCallum declares he will not change the way he plays. That will translate to - Australia will target him, thinking he's easy meat.

Meaning: our success could depend on how many he gets before he gets caught, and after that, Guptill and Kane need to steady the ship ... either for a good score or to chase successfully.

I need to look at what he averages in T20 ... it will be a cracker!

On that note, maybe we need a "Sports" section in GZ ...


Live by the sword, DIE by the sword.

My only wish for if Big Mac used a few brain cells!


It would have been a good toss to lose.

I think if we had chased, they would have know what they had to do, and would have seen that the pitch held no real demons apart from a good bit of swing in the first 8 or so overs.

We lost all our 'power' hitters for Zero runs (Bmac, Corey and Luke Ronchi).


And the others batted so slow that also killed the result a long way out

Except for Elliot, the late inclusion, criticised, who was the only guy to turn up in Oz, and did the job in the semis. I'd name him Kiwi man of the series as he performed when it got serious

Mad Scientist
19316 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2526

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1273417 30-Mar-2015 14:05
Send private message

at least show a little respect for M Starc ... to try and whack him from ball 1 is suicidal. could have rode him out then whack the rest. but not just big mac that had a brain explosion. the rest went down in lamer fashion!




Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.