Dochart: Bethell at 3 has done well so far, he just missed out his first century.
If we do decide to drop Conway and Mitchell then I agree with moving GP to 5 and let Ravindra open the batting with Young at 4. Chapman is also another option as well. He been in fine form at the moment with that massive double century the other day.
That is exactly what you are seeing, picking players specifically who can do what Baz wanted. Of course a shed load more to chose from.
But Im surprised its not NZ who have focused on high run rate test cricket, not Ind or Eng. But Stead is from a different era. So is Macca but at least hes super aggressive with batting.
This is the future of Test cricket, possibly 4 day matches with a spare day either side for rain, to induce results.
Im not sure about Rachin at 2, I dont know if its the best choice of our boy wonder. He is a Ross Taylor swap, but he is exactly the kind of player at #4 who should be batting like Brook.
Yes Chapman is flying under the radar with excellent avgs in all formats and yep that 276 was a good score for Auckland.
If Conway is not able to hit his way back then we need to start looking at #1/2/3 batsmen to open.
You could drop Mitchell for Chapman and Conway for Young, and Hay in for Blundell
1.Latham
2. Young
3. Williamson
4. Rachin
5. Phillips (who will avg mid 40s up the order)
6. Chapman
7. Hay
8. Smith
9. Henry
10 ORourke
11. B Sears
Or with Chapman, Rachin, GP all can bowl, possibly leave Sears out for an extra batsman
Either way, that team should be able to consistently hit aggresively like Eng have.